Wild boar rooting intensity determines shifts in understorey composition and functional traits

In recent decades, the European populations of wild boar have grown substantially, as has the impact of this species, owing above all to its rooting activity. Our aim was to investigate the relationships between vascular plant understorey and wild boar rooting intensity. The questions we addressed are: does rooting intensity influence understorey species composition and diversity? Which functional traits are associated with different levels of rooting? We performed a comparative analysis of plant communities in areas with contrasting levels of rooting intensity within a Mediterranean deciduous lowland forest in central Italy. Besides comparing species composition and diversity, we tested the association between species traits and rooting levels through fourth-corner analysis. We found that contrasting levels of rooting were associated to different understorey species composition and evenness, while we observed no significant difference in species richness. In contrast with our expectations, sites with lower rooting returned i) lower evenness values and ii) a higher proportion of species characterized by traits related to resistance or response to herbivory, i.e., spinescence, clonality, endozoochory, underground storage organs, and low height values. Our findings suggest that current vegetation patterns partly depend on the legacy effect of past rooting disturbance, since the areas currently subjected to low rooting intensity were likely to be intensely rooted in the past. These areas may have developed a marked dominance of clonal thorny species that, in turn, inhibited further feeding activities by wild boar.

[1]  Sandro Pignatti,et al.  Flora d'Italia , 2017 .

[2]  Tomáš Herben,et al.  CLO-PLA: a database of clonal and bud-bank traits of the Central European flora. , 2017, Ecology.

[3]  A. Giuliani,et al.  Woody flora as a predictor of vascular plant richness: An insight in Italy , 2015 .

[4]  A. Mortelliti,et al.  Quantifying Sus scrofa rooting effects on the understorey of the deciduous broadleaf forests in Castelporziano Estate (Italy) , 2015, Rendiconti Lincei.

[5]  Domenico Guida,et al.  Classification and mapping of the ecoregions of Italy , 2014 .

[6]  A. Catorci,et al.  Effect of tall-grass invasion on the flowering-related functional pattern of submediterranean hay-meadows , 2014 .

[7]  A. Stewart,et al.  Short-term response and recovery of bluebells (Hyacinthoides non-scripta) after rooting by wild boar (Sus scrofa) , 2014, Plant Ecology.

[8]  D. Mladenoff,et al.  Functional diversity of ground‐layer plant communities in old‐growth and managed northern hardwood forests , 2014 .

[9]  L. Boitani,et al.  Monitoring protocols for the evaluation of the impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting on plants and animals in forest ecosystems , 2014 .

[10]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Ground Layer Plant Species Turnover and Beta Diversity in Southern-European Old-Growth Forests , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  S. Ballari,et al.  A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges , 2014 .

[12]  L. Gil,et al.  Tree regeneration under high levels of wild ungulates: The use of chemically vs. physically-defended shrubs , 2014 .

[13]  O. Hjeljord,et al.  Wild boar rooting in a northern coniferous forest – minor silviculture impact , 2014 .

[14]  Todd E. Ristau,et al.  Long‐term biological legacies of herbivore density in a landscape‐scale experiment: forest understoreys reflect past deer density treatments for at least 20 years , 2014 .

[15]  C. Anderson,et al.  Linking invasive exotic vertebrates and their ecosystem impacts in Tierra del Fuego to test theory and determine action. , 2014 .

[16]  A. Čarni,et al.  Records of past land use are best stored in soil properties , 2013 .

[17]  C. Sandom,et al.  Rewilding the Scottish Highlands: Do Wild Boar, Sus scrofa, Use a Suitable Foraging Strategy to be Effective Ecosystem Engineers? , 2013 .

[18]  I. Abrudan,et al.  Comparison of structure, regeneration and dead wood in virgin forest remnant and managed forest on Grmeč Mountain in Western Bosnia , 2013 .

[19]  Guozhen Du,et al.  Effects of disturbance intensity on seasonal dynamics of alpine meadow soil seed banks on the Tibetan Plateau , 2013, Plant and Soil.

[20]  Haruka Ohashi,et al.  Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance , 2013 .

[21]  A. Catorci,et al.  Effect of sheep and horse grazing on species and functional composition of sub‐Mediterranean grasslands , 2012 .

[22]  Factors influencing wild boar damage in Taohongling National Nature Reserve in China: a model approach , 2013, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[23]  J. Lebreton,et al.  Conspecifics can be aliens too: A review of effects of restocking practices in vertebrates , 2012 .

[24]  Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[25]  WirthnerSven,et al.  Do changes in soil properties after rooting by wild boars (Sus scrofa) affect understory vegetation in Swiss hardwood forests , 2012 .

[26]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[27]  F. Sabatini,et al.  Testing indicators of sustainable forest management on understorey composition and diversity in southern Italy through variation partitioning , 2011, Plant Ecology.

[28]  R. Ojeda,et al.  Food habits and impact of rooting behaviour of the invasive wild boar, Sus scrofa, in a protected area of the Monte Desert, Argentina , 2010 .

[29]  E. Siemann,et al.  Experimental test of the impacts of feral hogs on forest dynamics and processes in the southeastern US , 2009 .

[30]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  Testing the species traits-environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. , 2008, Ecology.

[31]  Martin Hermy,et al.  The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora , 2008 .

[32]  J. Gómez,et al.  Wild boars (Sus scrofa) affect the recruitment rate and spatial distribution of holm oak (Quercus ilex) , 2008 .

[33]  Marc Dufrêne,et al.  Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa)in Luxembourg over a 10-year period , 2008, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[34]  F. Gilliam,et al.  The Ecological Significance of the Herbaceous Layer in Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 2007 .

[35]  Anne-Béatrice Dufour,et al.  The ade4 Package: Implementing the Duality Diagram for Ecologists , 2007 .

[36]  J. Travis,et al.  Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future , 2007 .

[37]  G. Moniello,et al.  Vegetable and animal food sorts found in the gastric content of Sardinian Wild Boar (Sus scrofa meridionalis). , 2007, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[38]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? , 2007 .

[39]  Alejandro A. Royo,et al.  On the formation of dense understory layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession , 2006 .

[40]  G. Oheimb,et al.  Soil seed banks near rubbing trees indicate dispersal of plant species into forests by wild boar , 2006 .

[41]  T. Ruf,et al.  Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers , 2005 .

[42]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  IMPACTS OF NEST CONSTRUCTION BY NATIVE PIGS (SUS SCROFA) ON LOWLAND MALAYSIAN RAIN FOREST SAPLINGS , 2005 .

[43]  G. von Oheimb,et al.  Dispersal of vascular plants by game in northern Germany. Part II: Red deer (Cervus elaphus) , 2005, European Journal of Forest Research.

[44]  G. Aronne,et al.  Flower development and reproductive continuity in MediterraneanRuscus aculeatus L. (Liliaceae) , 1999, Protoplasma.

[45]  J. Cushman,et al.  VARIABLE EFFECTS OF FERAL PIG DISTURBANCES ON NATIVE AND EXOTIC PLANTS IN A CALIFORNIA GRASSLAND , 2004 .

[46]  G. Oheimb,et al.  Dispersal of vascular plants by game in northern Germany. Part I: Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) , 2004, European Journal of Forest Research.

[47]  I. Albizu,et al.  Vegetation diversity and vertical structure as indicators of forest disturbance , 2004 .

[48]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[49]  G. Massei,et al.  The environmental impact of wild boar , 2004 .

[50]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[51]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[52]  J. Hone.  Feral pigs in Namadgi National Park, Australia: dynamics, impacts and management , 2002 .

[53]  M. Carranza,et al.  Excursion to the circeo National Park , 2002 .

[54]  J. Lepart,et al.  Changes in the vegetation of Quercus pubescens woodland after cessation of coppicing and grazing , 2001 .

[55]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[56]  J. Welander.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) rooting in a mosaic landscape , 2000 .

[57]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[58]  L. Boitani,et al.  Spatial and Activity Patterns of Wild Boars in Tuscany, Italy , 1994 .

[59]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology , 1992 .

[60]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Wildlife, Forests and Forestry: Principles of Managing Forests for Biological Diversity , 1989 .

[61]  C. SáAEZ-ROYUELA,et al.  The increased population of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Europe , 1986 .

[62]  S. Bratton.  The Effect of the European Wild Boar, Sus scrofa, on Gray Beech Forest in the Great Smoky Mountains , 1975 .