Linearization of the Hoek and Brown rock failure criterion for tunnelling in elasto-plastic rock masses

Abstract We present a novel methodology for estimation of equivalent Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters that can be used for design of supported tunnels in elasto-plastic rock masses satisfying the non-linear empirical Hoek–Brown failure criterion. We work with a general adimensional formulation of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion in the space of normalized Lambe's variables for plane stress, and we perform linearization considering the stress field in the plastic region around the tunnel. The procedure is validated using analytical solutions to a series of benchmark test cases. Numerical solutions are also employed to validate the procedure in cases for which analytical solutions are not available. Results indicate that the stress field in the plastic region around the tunnel, as well as the linearization method employed and the quality of the rock mass, has a significant impact on computed estimates of equivalent Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters. Results of numerical analyses also show that our proposed linearization method can be employed to estimate loads and moments on the tunnel support system. We recommend the equating model responses (EMR) method to compute equivalent Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters when the tunnel support pressure is accurately known, and we further show that our newly introduced linearization method can be employed as an alternative to the best fitting in the existing stress range (BFe) and best fitting in an artificial stress range (BFa) methods, providing performance estimates that are generally better than estimates of the BFe and BFa methods when differences with the response of the Hoek–Brown rock mass are of engineering significance (say more than 10%).

[1]  A. Sofianos,et al.  Equivalent tunnelling Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters for given Hoek-Brown ones , 2002 .

[2]  E. T. Brown,et al.  EMPIRICAL STRENGTH CRITERION FOR ROCK MASSES , 1980 .

[3]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[4]  Evert Hoek,et al.  The Hoek-Brown failure criterion-a 1988 update , 1988 .

[5]  Evert Hoek,et al.  HOEK-BROWN FAILURE CRITERION - 2002 EDITION , 2002 .

[6]  Shailendra K. Sharan,et al.  Analytical solutions for stresses and displacements around a circular opening in a generalized Hoek–Brown rock , 2008 .

[7]  C. Carranza-Torres,et al.  Dimensionless Graphical Representation of the Exact Elasto-plastic Solution of a Circular Tunnel in a Mohr-Coulomb Material Subject to Uniform Far-field Stresses , 2003 .

[8]  M. Fama Numerical Modeling of Yield Zones in Weak Rock , 1993 .

[9]  A. Serrano,et al.  Ultimate bearing capacity of rock masses based on the modified Hoek–Brown criterion , 2000 .

[10]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  Technical Note Tunnelling Mohr-Coulomb strength parameters for rock masses satisfying the generalized Hoek-Brown criterion , 2003 .

[11]  Carlos M Carranza-Torres,et al.  Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the hoek-brown failure criterion , 2004 .

[12]  A. I. Sofianos,et al.  Equivalent Mohr–Coulomb and generalized Hoek–Brown strength parameters for supported axisymmetric tunnels in plastic or brittle rock , 2006 .

[13]  Kyung-Ho Park,et al.  Analytical solution for a circular opening in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock , 2006 .