Parameter sensitivity analysis of a lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions in series.

Any disruption of the lymphatic system due to trauma or injury can lead to edema. There is no effective cure for lymphedema, partly because predictive knowledge of lymphatic system reactions to interventions is lacking. A well-developed model of the system could greatly improve our understanding of its function. Lymphangions, defined as the vessel segment between two valves, are the individual pumping units. Based on our previous lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions, this study aimed to identify the parameters that affect the system output the most using a sensitivity analysis. The system was highly sensitive to minimum valve resistance, such that variations in this parameter caused an order-of-magnitude change in time-average flow rate for certain values of imposed pressure difference. Average flow rate doubled when contraction frequency was increased within its physiological range. Optimum lymphangion length was found to be some 13-14.5 diameters. A peak of time-average flow rate occurred when transmural pressure was such that the pressure-diameter loop for active contractions was centered near maximum passive vessel compliance. Increasing the number of lymphangions in the chain improved the pumping in the presence of larger adverse pressure differences. For a given pressure difference, the optimal number of lymphangions increased with the total vessel length. These results indicate that further experiments to estimate valve resistance more accurately are necessary. The existence of an optimal value of transmural pressure may provide additional guidelines for increasing pumping in areas affected by edema.

[1]  M. Swartz,et al.  The physiology of the lymphatic system. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[2]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Regional Variations of Contractile Activity in Isolated Rat Lymphatics , 2004, Microcirculation.

[3]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Length‐Dependence of Lymphatic Phasic Contractile Activity Under Isometric and Isobaric Conditions , 2007, Microcirculation.

[4]  Narender Pabbathi Reddy A discrete model of the lymphatic system , 1974 .

[5]  G. Schmid-Schönbein,et al.  Microlymphatics and lymph flow. , 1990, Physiological reviews.

[6]  J. Moore,et al.  Development of a model of a multi-lymphangion lymphatic vessel incorporating realistic and measured parameter values , 2013, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[7]  J. Levick Circulation of fluid between plasma, interstitium and lymph , 1991 .

[8]  V. Hjortdal,et al.  Human thoracic duct in vitro: diameter-tension properties, spontaneous and evoked contractile activity. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[9]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Determinants of valve gating in collecting lymphatic vessels from rat mesentery. , 2011, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[10]  N P Reddy,et al.  A computer model of the lymphatic system. , 1977, Computers in biology and medicine.

[11]  Michael J. Davis,et al.  Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  R. Porcher,et al.  Long-Term Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema after Intensive Decongestive Physiotherapy , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[13]  R. Black,et al.  Modelling the lymphatic system: challenges and opportunities , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[14]  O. F. Kampmeier The genetic history of the valves in the lymphatic system of man , 1928 .

[15]  A. Venugopal,et al.  Lymphangion coordination minimally affects mean flow in lymphatic vessels. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[16]  C. Bertram,et al.  Effects of Lymphangion Subdivision in a Numerical Model of a Lymphatic Vessel , 2011 .

[17]  J. Moore,et al.  Incorporating measured valve properties into a numerical model of a lymphatic vessel , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[18]  T C Skalak,et al.  Structure of lymphatic valves in the spinotrapezius muscle of the rat. , 1987, Blood vessels.

[19]  A. Gashev Physiologic Aspects of Lymphatic Contractile Function , 2002 .

[20]  J. Moore,et al.  Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure. , 2011, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  J. Levick,et al.  An Introduction to Cardiovascular Physiology , 2009 .

[22]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Intrinsic pump-conduit behavior of lymphangions. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[23]  C. P. Winlove,et al.  Modeling flow in collecting lymphatic vessels: one-dimensional flow through a series of contractile elements. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[24]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Passive pressure-diameter relationship and structural composition of rat mesenteric lymphangions. , 2012, Lymphatic research and biology.

[25]  D. Zawieja,et al.  Intrinsic increase in lymphangion muscle contractility in response to elevated afterload. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[26]  H. Granger,et al.  Distribution, propagation, and coordination of contractile activity in lymphatics. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[27]  C. Briggs,et al.  The morphology of the human lymphatic vessels in the head and neck , 2010, Clinical anatomy.

[28]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Hemodynamic determinants of oxygen consumption of the heart with special reference to the tension-time index. , 1957, The American journal of physiology.

[29]  A. Gashev,et al.  Rate‐sensitive contractile responses of lymphatic vessels to circumferential stretch , 2009, The Journal of physiology.