Modeling of lightly doped drain and source graphene nanoribbon field effect transistors

Abstract In this paper, to minimize the tunneling leakage current, we propose a graphene nanoribbon (GNR) field effect transistor (FET) using lightly doped drain and source (LDDS) between intrinsic channel region and highly doped source and drain regions. By using a nonequilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) method, the transport characteristics of LDDS-GNRFET in comparison to those of conventional GNRFET are investigated. According to simulation results, LDDS-GNRFET with proper doping in LDDS regions, demonstrates much less leakage current, larger ON–OFF ratio ( I on /I off ), better subthreshold-swing (SS), no ambipolar characteristic, and better switching parameters. These advantages represent the proposed structure as a suitable candidate for low-power and high-speed applications.

[1]  Jing Guo,et al.  Scaling Behaviors of Graphene Nanoribbon FETs: A Three-Dimensional Quantum Simulation Study , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[2]  Stefan Heinze,et al.  Electrostatic engineering of nanotube transistors for improved performance , 2003 .

[3]  H. Dai,et al.  Chemically Derived, Ultrasmooth Graphene Nanoribbon Semiconductors , 2008, Science.

[4]  S. Datta Nanoscale device modeling: the Green’s function method , 2000 .

[5]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films , 2004, Science.

[6]  R. Murali,et al.  Pionics: the Emerging Science and Technology of Graphene-based Nanoelectronics , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[7]  Richard Van Noorden Moving towards a graphene world , 2006, Nature.

[8]  M. Lundstrom,et al.  Computational study of carbon nanotube p-i-n tunnel FETs , 2005, IEEE InternationalElectron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest..

[9]  S. Datta,et al.  Simulating quantum transport in nanoscale transistors: Real versus mode-space approaches , 2002 .

[10]  Fujita,et al.  Edge state in graphene ribbons: Nanometer size effect and edge shape dependence. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[11]  Jing Guo,et al.  Performance Comparison of Graphene Nanoribbon FETs With Schottky Contacts and Doped Reservoirs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[12]  Zhiping Yu,et al.  Simulation Investigation of Double-Gate CNR-MOSFETs with a Fully Self-Consistent NEGF and TB Method , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[13]  M. Rooks,et al.  Graphene nano-ribbon electronics , 2007, cond-mat/0701599.

[14]  Mark S. Lundstrom,et al.  Ballistic graphene nanoribbon metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors: A full real-space quantum transport simulation , 2007 .

[15]  Mark S. Lundstrom,et al.  Performance analysis and design optimization of near ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors , 2004, IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004..

[16]  P. Kim,et al.  Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[17]  Oded Hod,et al.  Electronic structure and stability of semiconducting graphene nanoribbons. , 2006, Nano letters.

[18]  S. Louie,et al.  Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. , 2006, Physical Review Letters.

[19]  G. Fiori,et al.  Simulation of Graphene Nanoribbon Field-Effect Transistors , 2007, IEEE Electron Device Letters.