Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Sungjin Park,et al. Microfluidic permeation printing of self-assembled monolayer gradients on surfaces for chemoselective ligand immobilization applied to cell adhesion and polarization. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[2] M. Riehle,et al. Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.
[3] L. Addadi,et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.
[4] Daniel Choquet,et al. Trimers of the fibronectin cell adhesion domain localize to actin filament bundles and undergo rearward translocation. , 2002, Journal of cell science.
[5] M. Ventre,et al. Cell fluidics: producing cellular streams on micropatterned synthetic surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[6] S. Gerecht,et al. Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography , 2008, Advanced materials.
[7] Martin Bastmeyer,et al. Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.
[8] Michael P. Sheetz,et al. Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.
[9] M. Pierschbacher,et al. Concept and progress in the development of RGD‐containing peptide pharmaceuticals , 1995, Biopolymers.
[10] Giuseppe Gigli,et al. Mechanical Gradient Cues for Guided Cell Motility and Control of Cell Behavior on Uniform Substrates , 2009 .
[11] Barry S. Coller,et al. Immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides of varying lengths as structural probes of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. , 1992 .
[12] Micah Dembo,et al. The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.
[13] J. West,et al. Cell migration through defined, synthetic extracellular matrix analogues , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[14] Carlos Bustamante,et al. Grabbing the cat by the tail: manipulating molecules one by one , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[15] J. Jansen,et al. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[16] Claude Martelet,et al. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour , 2003 .
[17] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.
[18] J. Jansen,et al. The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[19] M. Sheetz,et al. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[20] Gabriela Kalna,et al. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.
[21] J. Y. Lim,et al. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. , 2007, Tissue engineering.
[22] Joe Tien,et al. Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[23] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. , 2009, Soft matter.
[24] Linda G Griffith,et al. Interplay between PEO tether length and ligand spacing governs cell spreading on RGD-modified PMMA-g-PEO comb copolymers. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.
[25] A Curtis,et al. Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.
[26] P. Janmey,et al. Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .
[27] Benjamin M. Wu,et al. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[28] M. Naceur,et al. Cell Adhesion to Biomaterials: Concept of Biocompatibility , 2013 .
[29] Alain Guignandon,et al. The effect of RGD density on osteoblast and endothelial cell behavior on RGD-grafted polyethylene terephthalate surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[30] C. Wilkinson,et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.
[31] Francis E H Tay,et al. A quantitative observation and imaging of single tumor cell migration and deformation using a multi-gap microfluidic device representing the blood vessel. , 2006, Microvascular research.
[32] C J Murphy,et al. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[33] Ali Khademhosseini,et al. Nanoscale tissue engineering: spatial control over cell-materials interactions , 2011, Nanotechnology.
[34] Erich Sackmann,et al. Cell adhesion as wetting transition? , 2002, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.
[35] Christopher J Murphy,et al. Sub-micron and nanoscale feature depth modulates alignment of stromal fibroblasts and corneal epithelial cells in serum-rich and serum-free media. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[36] J. Hubbell,et al. An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.
[37] Y. Wang,et al. High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.
[38] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.
[39] N. Hallab,et al. Cell adhesion to biomaterials: correlations between surface charge, surface roughness, adsorbed protein, and cell morphology. , 1995, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.
[40] Jiandong Ding,et al. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[41] Milan Mrksich,et al. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Christopher S. Chen,et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.
[43] Matthias P Lutolf,et al. Artificial Stem Cell Niches , 2009, Advanced materials.
[44] P. Ghazal,et al. Digital clocks: simple Boolean models can quantitatively describe circadian systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[45] D. A. Hanson,et al. Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[46] Patrick W Oakes,et al. Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. , 2011, Biophysical journal.
[47] Chung-Hsing Li,et al. Interactions between chitosan and cells measured by AFM , 2010, Biomedical materials.
[48] Xiaojie Lian,et al. Using selected uniform cells in round shape with a micropipette to measure cell adhesion strength on silk fibroin-based materials , 2008 .
[49] Matthew J. Dalby,et al. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[50] Horacio D. Espinosa,et al. MEASURING CELL ADHESION USING MEMS TECHNOLOGY , 2006 .
[51] P. Janmey,et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.
[52] E O Pettersen,et al. Cell adhesion force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[53] W. Frey,et al. Highly parallel fabrication of nanopatterned surfaces with nanoscale orthogonal biofunctionalization imprint lithography , 2007, Nanotechnology.
[54] A. Yamamoto,et al. Quantitative evaluation of cell attachment to glass, polystyrene, and fibronectin- or collagen-coated polystyrene by measurement of cell adhesive shear force and cell detachment energy. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[55] A. Harris,et al. Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.
[56] Jian Qin,et al. Adhesion strength of human tenocytes to extracellular matrix component-modified poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) substrates. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[57] Ulrich S Schwarz,et al. Optimization of traction force microscopy for micron-sized focal adhesions , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.
[58] C. Murphy,et al. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[59] U. Schwarz,et al. Cell adhesion strength is controlled by intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors. , 2010, Biophysical journal.
[60] Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al. High-Resolution Traction Force Microscopy 20 , 2014 .
[61] Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al. Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.
[62] Adam J. Engler,et al. Supplemental Data Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006 .
[63] E. Place,et al. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.
[64] Daniela Guarnieri,et al. Surface investigation on biomimetic materials to control cell adhesion: the case of RGD conjugation on PCL. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[65] Harry Heinzelmann,et al. Measuring cell adhesion forces during the cell cycle by force spectroscopy , 2009, Biointerphases.
[66] Astrid Magenau,et al. The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion , 2011, PloS one.
[67] Sheila MacNeil,et al. Production and performance of biomaterials containing RGD peptides , 2008 .
[68] Filippo Stefanoni,et al. Molding Micropatterns of Elasticity on PEG‐Based Hydrogels to Control Cell Adhesion and Migration , 2011 .
[69] G. Whitesides,et al. Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[70] Denis P. Dowling,et al. Effect of Surface Wettability and Topography on the Adhesion of Osteosarcoma Cells on Plasma-modified Polystyrene , 2011, Journal of biomaterials applications.
[71] A F von Recum,et al. Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[72] R Geoff Richards,et al. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[73] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.
[74] Jean-Jacques Meister,et al. Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.
[75] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.
[76] Daniel A. Hammer,et al. Endothelial Cell Traction Forces on RGD-Derivatized Polyacrylamide Substrata † , 2003 .
[77] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.
[78] Matthew L Becker,et al. The modulation of dendritic cell integrin binding and activation by RGD-peptide density gradient substrates. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[79] Silvia Mittler,et al. Migration of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on Nanometric Topographical Patterns: Influence of Filopodia and Focal Adhesions on Contact Guidance , 2010, PloS one.
[80] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[81] L G Griffith,et al. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.
[82] W Monty Reichert,et al. Directed cell migration on fibronectin gradients: effect of gradient slope. , 2006, Experimental cell research.
[83] S. Sen,et al. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.
[84] Clare M Waterman,et al. High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.
[85] Kam W Leong,et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[86] K. Bhadriraju,et al. Hepatocyte adhesion, growth and differentiated function on RGD-containing proteins. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[87] J. Ohayon,et al. The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[88] Masahiro Ohshima,et al. Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[89] Donald E Ingber,et al. Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[90] P. Janmey,et al. Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.
[91] Jennifer L West,et al. Covalent immobilization of RGDS on hydrogel surfaces to direct cell alignment and migration. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[92] A. Borzacchiello,et al. Covalently immobilized RGD gradient on PEG hydrogel scaffold influences cell migration parameters. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.
[93] Renny T. Franceschi,et al. Critical role of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase–MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.
[94] R. Austin,et al. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[95] D. Ingber. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.
[96] Martin A. Schwartz,et al. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[97] C. S. Chen,et al. Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.
[98] Juin-Yih Lai,et al. Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[99] H. Busscher,et al. Plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces: model surfaces for studying cell-biomaterial interactions. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[100] Kam W Leong,et al. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.
[101] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[102] R Geoff Richards,et al. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[103] M. Dembo,et al. Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.
[104] G. Truskey,et al. Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion. , 1996, Biophysical journal.
[105] Y. Wang,et al. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[106] C. Siedlecki,et al. Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[107] Gi Seok Jeong,et al. Microfluidic assay of endothelial cell migration in 3D interpenetrating polymer semi-network HA-Collagen hydrogel , 2011, Biomedical microdevices.
[108] Christopher J Murphy,et al. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[109] Tao He,et al. The effect of adhesive ligands on bacterial and fibroblast adhesions to surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[110] C J Murphy,et al. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.
[111] C. Coulson,et al. Molecular Architecture , 1953, Nature.
[112] Joyce Y Wong,et al. Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[113] M. Dembo,et al. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[114] Horst Kessler,et al. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.
[115] J. Jansen,et al. The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.
[116] G. Whitesides,et al. Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[117] Pascal Silberzan,et al. Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.
[118] Jun Hu,et al. Nanotopographical guidance of C6 glioma cell alignment and oriented growth. , 2004, Biomaterials.
[119] Mina J. Bissell,et al. Tissue architecture and function: dynamic reciprocity via extra- and intra-cellular matrices , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.
[120] Matthias Chiquet,et al. Nano-Stenciled RGD-Gold Patterns That Inhibit Focal Contact Maturation Induce Lamellipodia Formation in Fibroblasts , 2011, PloS one.
[121] Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al. The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.