Determinants of cell–material crosstalk at the interface: towards engineering of cell instructive materials

The development of novel biomaterials able to control cell activities and direct their fate is warranted for engineering functional biological tissues, advanced cell culture systems, single-cell diagnosis as well as for cell sorting and differentiation. It is well established that crosstalk at the cell–material interface occurs and this has a profound influence on cell behaviour. However, the complete deciphering of the cell–material communication code is still far away. A variety of material surface properties have been reported to affect the strength and the nature of the cell–material interactions, including biological cues, topography and mechanical properties. Novel experimental evidence bears out the hypothesis that these three different signals participate in the same material–cytoskeleton crosstalk pathway via adhesion plaque formation dynamics. In this review, we present the relevant findings on material-induced cell response along with the description of cell behaviour when exposed to arrays of signals—biochemical, topographical and mechanical. Finally, with the aid of literature data, we attempt to draw unifying elements of the material–cytoskeleton–cell fate chain.

[1]  Sungjin Park,et al.  Microfluidic permeation printing of self-assembled monolayer gradients on surfaces for chemoselective ligand immobilization applied to cell adhesion and polarization. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  M. Riehle,et al.  Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[3]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[4]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Trimers of the fibronectin cell adhesion domain localize to actin filament bundles and undergo rearward translocation. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[5]  M. Ventre,et al.  Cell fluidics: producing cellular streams on micropatterned synthetic surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  S. Gerecht,et al.  Enhancement of In Vitro Capillary Tube Formation by Substrate Nanotopography , 2008, Advanced materials.

[7]  Martin Bastmeyer,et al.  Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[8]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[9]  M. Pierschbacher,et al.  Concept and progress in the development of RGD‐containing peptide pharmaceuticals , 1995, Biopolymers.

[10]  Giuseppe Gigli,et al.  Mechanical Gradient Cues for Guided Cell Motility and Control of Cell Behavior on Uniform Substrates , 2009 .

[11]  Barry S. Coller,et al.  Immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides of varying lengths as structural probes of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. , 1992 .

[12]  Micah Dembo,et al.  The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. West,et al.  Cell migration through defined, synthetic extracellular matrix analogues , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Carlos Bustamante,et al.  Grabbing the cat by the tail: manipulating molecules one by one , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[16]  Claude Martelet,et al.  Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour , 2003 .

[17]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  J. Jansen,et al.  The threshold at which substrate nanogroove dimensions may influence fibroblast alignment and adhesion. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[19]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Gabriela Kalna,et al.  Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[21]  J. Y. Lim,et al.  Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[22]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[23]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. , 2009, Soft matter.

[24]  Linda G Griffith,et al.  Interplay between PEO tether length and ligand spacing governs cell spreading on RGD-modified PMMA-g-PEO comb copolymers. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[25]  A Curtis,et al.  Topographical control of cells. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[26]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[27]  Benjamin M. Wu,et al.  Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanotopography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  M. Naceur,et al.  Cell Adhesion to Biomaterials: Concept of Biocompatibility , 2013 .

[29]  Alain Guignandon,et al.  The effect of RGD density on osteoblast and endothelial cell behavior on RGD-grafted polyethylene terephthalate surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[30]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[31]  Francis E H Tay,et al.  A quantitative observation and imaging of single tumor cell migration and deformation using a multi-gap microfluidic device representing the blood vessel. , 2006, Microvascular research.

[32]  C J Murphy,et al.  Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[33]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Nanoscale tissue engineering: spatial control over cell-materials interactions , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[34]  Erich Sackmann,et al.  Cell adhesion as wetting transition? , 2002, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[35]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Sub-micron and nanoscale feature depth modulates alignment of stromal fibroblasts and corneal epithelial cells in serum-rich and serum-free media. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[36]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[37]  Y. Wang,et al.  High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[38]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[39]  N. Hallab,et al.  Cell adhesion to biomaterials: correlations between surface charge, surface roughness, adsorbed protein, and cell morphology. , 1995, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[40]  Jiandong Ding,et al.  Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[41]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[43]  Matthias P Lutolf,et al.  Artificial Stem Cell Niches , 2009, Advanced materials.

[44]  P. Ghazal,et al.  Digital clocks: simple Boolean models can quantitatively describe circadian systems , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[45]  D. A. Hanson,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase: in command and control of cell motility , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  Patrick W Oakes,et al.  Spatiotemporal constraints on the force-dependent growth of focal adhesions. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Chung-Hsing Li,et al.  Interactions between chitosan and cells measured by AFM , 2010, Biomedical materials.

[48]  Xiaojie Lian,et al.  Using selected uniform cells in round shape with a micropipette to measure cell adhesion strength on silk fibroin-based materials , 2008 .

[49]  Matthew J. Dalby,et al.  Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[50]  Horacio D. Espinosa,et al.  MEASURING CELL ADHESION USING MEMS TECHNOLOGY , 2006 .

[51]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[52]  E O Pettersen,et al.  Cell adhesion force microscopy. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  W. Frey,et al.  Highly parallel fabrication of nanopatterned surfaces with nanoscale orthogonal biofunctionalization imprint lithography , 2007, Nanotechnology.

[54]  A. Yamamoto,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of cell attachment to glass, polystyrene, and fibronectin- or collagen-coated polystyrene by measurement of cell adhesive shear force and cell detachment energy. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[55]  A. Harris,et al.  Silicone rubber substrata: a new wrinkle in the study of cell locomotion. , 1980, Science.

[56]  Jian Qin,et al.  Adhesion strength of human tenocytes to extracellular matrix component-modified poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) substrates. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[57]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Optimization of traction force microscopy for micron-sized focal adhesions , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[58]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[59]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell adhesion strength is controlled by intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[60]  Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al.  High-Resolution Traction Force Microscopy 20 , 2014 .

[61]  Miguel Vicente-Manzanares,et al.  Actin and α-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner , 2008, Nature Cell Biology.

[62]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Supplemental Data Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006 .

[63]  E. Place,et al.  Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.

[64]  Daniela Guarnieri,et al.  Surface investigation on biomimetic materials to control cell adhesion: the case of RGD conjugation on PCL. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[65]  Harry Heinzelmann,et al.  Measuring cell adhesion forces during the cell cycle by force spectroscopy , 2009, Biointerphases.

[66]  Astrid Magenau,et al.  The Relative Importance of Topography and RGD Ligand Density for Endothelial Cell Adhesion , 2011, PloS one.

[67]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  Production and performance of biomaterials containing RGD peptides , 2008 .

[68]  Filippo Stefanoni,et al.  Molding Micropatterns of Elasticity on PEG‐Based Hydrogels to Control Cell Adhesion and Migration , 2011 .

[69]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. , 2003, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[70]  Denis P. Dowling,et al.  Effect of Surface Wettability and Topography on the Adhesion of Osteosarcoma Cells on Plasma-modified Polystyrene , 2011, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[71]  A F von Recum,et al.  Orientation of ECM protein deposition, fibroblast cytoskeleton, and attachment complex components on silicone microgrooved surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[72]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[73]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. , 2004, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[74]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[75]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Molecular architecture and function of matrix adhesions. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[76]  Daniel A. Hammer,et al.  Endothelial Cell Traction Forces on RGD-Derivatized Polyacrylamide Substrata † , 2003 .

[77]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Lateral spacing of integrin ligands influences cell spreading and focal adhesion assembly. , 2006, European journal of cell biology.

[78]  Matthew L Becker,et al.  The modulation of dendritic cell integrin binding and activation by RGD-peptide density gradient substrates. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[79]  Silvia Mittler,et al.  Migration of Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts on Nanometric Topographical Patterns: Influence of Filopodia and Focal Adhesions on Contact Guidance , 2010, PloS one.

[80]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to low-adhesion nanotopographies originally fabricated by electron beam lithography , 2007, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[81]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[82]  W Monty Reichert,et al.  Directed cell migration on fibronectin gradients: effect of gradient slope. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[83]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[84]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  High resolution traction force microscopy based on experimental and computational advances. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[85]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[86]  K. Bhadriraju,et al.  Hepatocyte adhesion, growth and differentiated function on RGD-containing proteins. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[87]  J. Ohayon,et al.  The motility of normal and cancer cells in response to the combined influence of the substrate rigidity and anisotropic microstructure. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[88]  Masahiro Ohshima,et al.  Time-lapse observation of cell alignment on nanogrooved patterns , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[89]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Directional control of cell motility through focal adhesion positioning and spatial control of Rac activation , 2008, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[90]  P. Janmey,et al.  Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[91]  Jennifer L West,et al.  Covalent immobilization of RGDS on hydrogel surfaces to direct cell alignment and migration. , 2005, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[92]  A. Borzacchiello,et al.  Covalently immobilized RGD gradient on PEG hydrogel scaffold influences cell migration parameters. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[93]  Renny T. Franceschi,et al.  Critical role of the extracellular signal–regulated kinase–MAPK pathway in osteoblast differentiation and skeletal development , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[94]  R. Austin,et al.  Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  D. Ingber Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[96]  Martin A. Schwartz,et al.  Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[97]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[98]  Juin-Yih Lai,et al.  Quantitative analysis of osteoblast-like cells (MG63) morphology on nanogrooved substrata with various groove and ridge dimensions. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[99]  H. Busscher,et al.  Plasma-treated polystyrene surfaces: model surfaces for studying cell-biomaterial interactions. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[100]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. , 2007, Experimental cell research.

[101]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[102]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[103]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[104]  G. Truskey,et al.  Effect of receptor-ligand affinity on the strength of endothelial cell adhesion. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[105]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  C. Siedlecki,et al.  Submicron poly(L-lactic acid) pillars affect fibroblast adhesion and proliferation. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[107]  Gi Seok Jeong,et al.  Microfluidic assay of endothelial cell migration in 3D interpenetrating polymer semi-network HA-Collagen hydrogel , 2011, Biomedical microdevices.

[108]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[109]  Tao He,et al.  The effect of adhesive ligands on bacterial and fibroblast adhesions to surfaces. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[110]  C J Murphy,et al.  Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[111]  C. Coulson,et al.  Molecular Architecture , 1953, Nature.

[112]  Joyce Y Wong,et al.  Direct comparison of the spread area, contractility, and migration of balb/c 3T3 fibroblasts adhered to fibronectin- and RGD-modified substrata. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[113]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[114]  Horst Kessler,et al.  RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[115]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale topographical cues on initial osteoblast morphology and migration. , 2010, European cells & materials.

[116]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Compatibility of mammalian cells on surfaces of poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[117]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[118]  Jun Hu,et al.  Nanotopographical guidance of C6 glioma cell alignment and oriented growth. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[119]  Mina J. Bissell,et al.  Tissue architecture and function: dynamic reciprocity via extra- and intra-cellular matrices , 2009, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[120]  Matthias Chiquet,et al.  Nano-Stenciled RGD-Gold Patterns That Inhibit Focal Contact Maturation Induce Lamellipodia Formation in Fibroblasts , 2011, PloS one.

[121]  Nikolaj Gadegaard,et al.  The response of fibroblasts to hexagonal nanotopography fabricated by electron beam lithography. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.