Effect of video lag on laparoscopic surgery: correlation between performance and usability at low latencies

Few telesurgery studies assess the impact of latency on user experience, low latencies are often not studied despite evidence of negative effects, and some studies recruit inexperienced subjects instead of surgeons without evidence that latency affects both groups similarly.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  Steven E. Butner,et al.  Transforming a surgical robot for human telesurgery , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  T. Kim,et al.  The effect of delayed visual feedback on telerobotic surgery , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[4]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[5]  Katerina Mania,et al.  Perceptual sensitivity to head tracking latency in virtual environments with varying degrees of scene complexity , 2004, APGV '04.

[6]  R Morady,et al.  Long‐distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments , 2006, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[7]  Rajni Patel,et al.  Pre‐clinical remote telesurgery trial of a da Vinci telesurgery prototype , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[8]  Bing Wu,et al.  Effects of visual latency on visual-haptic experience of stiffness , 2015, 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[9]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis and Expert Thought: Concurrent Verbalizations of Thinking during Experts' Performance on Representative Tasks , 2006 .

[10]  S. Horgan,et al.  Three-dimensional vision enhances task performance independently of the surgical method , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Benjamin R. Lee,et al.  Effect of time delay on surgical performance during telesurgical manipulation. , 2000, Journal of endourology.

[12]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer® simulator , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Gavin S. P. Miller,et al.  A real-time low-latency hardware light-field renderer , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[15]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[16]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Development and Validation of a Surgical Workload Measure: The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) , 2011, World Journal of Surgery.

[17]  Song Xu,et al.  Impact of delay on telesurgical performance: study on the robotic simulator dV-Trainer , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Teleoperation in surgical robotics – network latency effects on surgical performance , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  G. Fried,et al.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. , 2004, Surgery.

[21]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Quality of Experience , 2014, T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services.

[22]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Self-assessment of performance among surgical trainees during simulated procedures in a simulated operating theater. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[23]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery , 2001, Nature.

[24]  Mehran Anvari,et al.  The impact of latency on surgical precision and task completion during robotic-assisted remote telepresence surgery , 2005, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[25]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[26]  Katrien De Moor,et al.  Quality of Experience Versus User Experience , 2014, Quality of Experience.

[27]  J. Kruger,et al.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  Gyusung I. Lee,et al.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[29]  Y. Kopelman,et al.  Trends in Evolving Technologies in the Operating Room of the Future , 2013, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[30]  M. Dufaut,et al.  Paradigms and experimental set-up for the determination of the acceptable delay in Telesurgery , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  Bernard D. Adelstein,et al.  Localization of a Time-Delayed, Monocular Virtual Object Superimposed on a Real Environment , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.