Consortium diversity of a sulfate‐reducing biofilm developed at acidic pH influent conditions in a down‐flow fluidized bed reactor

Sulfate reduction is an appropriate approach for the treatment of effluents with sulfate and dissolved metals. In sulfate‐reducing reactors, acetate may largely contribute to the residual organic matter, because not all sulfate reducers are able to couple the oxidation of acetate to the reduction of sulfate, limiting the treatment efficiency. In this study, we investigated the diversity of a bacterial community in the biofilm of a laboratory scale down‐flow fluidized bed reactor, which was developed under sulfidogenic conditions at an influent pH between 4 and 6. The sequence analysis of the microbial community showed that the 16S rRNA gene sequence of almost 50% of the clones had a high similarity with Anaerolineaceae. At second place, 33% of the 16S rRNA phylotypes were affiliated with the sulfate‐reducing bacteria Desulfobacca acetoxidans and Desulfatirhabdium butyrativorans, suggesting that acetotrophic sulfate reduction was occurring in the system. The remaining bacterial phylotypes were related to fermenting bacteria found at the advanced stage of reactor operation. The results indicate that the acetotrophic sulfate‐reducing bacteria were able to remain within the biofilm, which is a significant result because few natural consortia harbor complete oxidizing sulfate‐reducers, improving the acetate removal via sulfate reduction in the reactor.

[1]  K. Küsel.  Microbial cycling of iron and sulfur in acidic coal mining lake sediments , 2003 .

[2]  W. Vahjen,et al.  Interference of humic acids and DNA extracted directly from soil in detection and transformation of recombinant DNA from bacteria and a yeast , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  N. Ren,et al.  Effect of carbon sources on sulfidogenic bacterial communities during the starting-up of acidogenic sulfate-reducing bioreactors. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[4]  P. Lawson,et al.  Anaerofustis stercorihominis gen. nov., sp. nov., from human feces. , 2004, Anaerobe.

[5]  Y. Kamagata,et al.  Bellilinea caldifistulae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Longilinea arvoryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., strictly anaerobic, filamentous bacteria of the phylum Chloroflexi isolated from methanogenic propionate-degrading consortia. , 2007, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[6]  B. Tindall,et al.  Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. , 2005, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[7]  J. Puhakka,et al.  Sulfate Reduction Based Bioprocesses for the Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and the Recovery of Metals , 2007 .

[8]  A. Annachhatre,et al.  Electron donors for biological sulfate reduction. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[9]  M. Capela,et al.  Effect of COD/SO42- ratio and sulfide on thermophilic (55°C) sulfate reduction during the acidification of sucrose at pH 6 , 2007 .

[10]  E. Sahinkaya,et al.  Comparison of sulfidogenic up-flow and down-flow fluidized-bed reactors for the biotreatment of acidic metal-containing wastewater. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[11]  D. Canfield,et al.  Aquatic geomicrobiology. , 2005, Advances in marine biology.

[12]  J. Puhakka,et al.  Performance and Ethanol Oxidation Kinetics of a Sulfate-Reducing Fluidized-Bed Reactor Treating Acidic Metal-Containing Wastewater , 2003, Biodegradation.

[13]  A. Stams,et al.  Desulfobacca acetoxidans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel acetate-degrading sulfate reducer isolated from sulfidogenic granular sludge. , 1999, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[14]  P. Gaudu,et al.  Multiple control of the acetate pathway in Lactococcus lactis under aeration by catabolite repression and metabolites , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[15]  A. Stams,et al.  Desulfatirhabdium butyrativorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a butyrate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from an anaerobic bioreactor. , 2008, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[16]  L. Celis,et al.  Precipitation and recovery of metal sulfides from metal containing acidic wastewater in a sulfidogenic down‐flow fluidized bed reactor , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  D. Lane.  16S/23S rRNA sequencing , 1991 .

[18]  P. Kemp,et al.  Bacterial diversity in aquatic and other environments: what 16S rDNA libraries can tell us. , 2004, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[19]  A. Stams,et al.  The ecology and biotechnology of sulphate-reducing bacteria , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[20]  E. Pelletier,et al.  Towards the definition of a core of microorganisms involved in anaerobic digestion of sludge , 2009, The ISME Journal.

[21]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Update of the All-Species Living Tree Project based on 16S and 23S rRNA sequence analyses. , 2010, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[22]  J. Puhakka,et al.  The performance, kinetics and microbiology of sulfidogenic fluidized-bed treatment of acidic metal- and sulfate-containing wastewater , 2006 .

[23]  N. Palleroni,et al.  Stenotrophomonas, a new bacterial genus for Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983. , 1993, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[24]  A. J. Jones,et al.  New Screening Software Shows that Most Recent Large 16S rRNA Gene Clone Libraries Contain Chimeras , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[25]  Jian Ye,et al.  BLAST: improvements for better sequence analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  G. Fox,et al.  PCR amplification of 16S rDNA from lyophilized cell cultures facilitates studies in molecular systematics , 2005, Current Microbiology.

[27]  James R. Cole,et al.  The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[29]  J. Overmann.  Green Nonsulfur Bacteria , 2008 .

[30]  R. Conrad,et al.  Stable carbon isotope fractionation by acetotrophic sulfur-reducing bacteria. , 2010, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[31]  S. Haruta,et al.  Distinctive Responses of Metabolically Active Microbiota to Acidification in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester , 2011, Microbial Ecology.

[32]  S. Rossetti,et al.  Identity, abundance and ecophysiology of filamentous Chloroflexi species present in activated sludge treatment plants. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[33]  D. Canfield,et al.  Systematics and Phylogeny , 2005 .

[34]  P. Lens,et al.  High-rate sulfate reduction at high salinity (up to 90 mS.cm(-1)) in mesophilic UASB reactors. , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[35]  G. Esposito,et al.  Perspectives of sulfate reducing bioreactors in environmental biotechnology , 2002 .

[36]  Jonas Blomberg,et al.  Annotation and visualization of endogenous retroviral sequences using the Distributed Annotation System (DAS) and eBioX , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[37]  Wonyong Kim.  The genus Lactococcus , 2014 .

[38]  J. Puhakka,et al.  Simple organic electron donors support diverse sulfate-reducing communities in fluidized-bed reactors treating acidic metal- and sulfate-containing wastewater. , 2004, FEMS microbiology ecology.