A method for estimating age of Danish medieval sub-adults based on long bone length.

The preferred method for aging archaeological sub-adult skeletons is by dental examination. In cases where no dental records are available, age estimation may be performed according to epiphyseal union, skeletal elements or diaphyseal lengths. Currently no data have been produced specifically for aging archaeological Danish sub-adults from the medieval period based on diaphyseal lengths. The problem with using data on Danish samples, which have been derived from a different population, is the possibility of skewing age estimates. In this study 58 Danish archaeological sub-adults were examined, aged from approximately six years to twenty-one years. The samples were aged according to two dental methods: Haavikko and Ubelaker. Regression formulae were constructed for aging according to their diaphyseal lengths both for individual long bones and combinations of upper and lower long bones. This study indicated that with the regression formulae developed, estimation of age can be done with reasonable results on Danish sub-adults. The Danish data were then compared to data from a different archaeological sample and a modern sample. It showed that the modern data indicated a consistently lower age compared to this sample which increased until reaching a maximum of nearly five years and six months. When comparing the archaeological data to this study, the growth profile crossed over at 12.5 years with a maximum age difference before the cross point of two years and three months lower for the archaeological data. After the cross point there was a maximum difference of three years and four months higher for the archaeological data. This study has shown the importance of using data for age estimation for archaeological material which has been developed specifically for that population. In addition it has presented a possible solution for Danish sub-adult material when dental material is not available.

[1]  J. Prieto,et al.  Evaluation of chronological age based on third molar development in the Spanish population , 2005, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[2]  A. Miles,et al.  Growth curves of immature bones from a Scottish island population of sixteenth to mid-nineteenth century: Shoulder girdle, ilium, pubis and ischium , 1995 .

[3]  G. Koch,et al.  Age estimation up to 16 years of age based on dental development. , 1974, Odontologisk revy.

[4]  J. M. Hoffman.  Age estimations from diaphyseal lengths: two months to twelve years. , 1979, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  C. Wall.  Evidence of weaning stress and catch-up growth in the long bones of a central California Amerindian sample. , 1991, Annals of human biology.

[6]  F. Johnston.  Growth of the long bones of infants and young children at Indian Knoll. , 1962, American journal of physical anthropology.

[7]  P. S. Gindhart.  Growth standards for the tibia and radius in children aged one month through eighteen years. , 1973, American journal of physical anthropology.

[8]  Hélène Coqueugniot,et al.  Brief communication: a probabilistic approach to age estimation from infracranial sequences of maturation. , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[9]  C. Roberts,et al.  A Study of Non-specific Stress Indicators and Skeletal Growth in Two Mediaeval Subadult Populations , 1996 .

[10]  S. Garn,et al.  Relationship Between Tooth Formation and Other Maturational Factors , 1960 .

[11]  R. Hoppa.  Evaluating human skeletal growth: An Anglo‐Saxon example , 1992 .

[12]  F. Valentin,et al.  Comparison of child morbidity in two contrasting medieval cemeteries from Denmark. , 2005, American journal of physical anthropology.

[13]  U. Welander,et al.  Age estimation based on tooth development: a test of reliability and validity. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[14]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  Developmental Juvenile Osteology. By LOUISE SCHEUER and SUE BLACK. (Pp. x+587; fully illustrated; $159 hardback; ISBN 0 12 624000 0.) San Diego: Academic Press. 2000 , 2001 .

[15]  S. Saunders,et al.  Growth deficit in survivors and non-survivors: Biological mortality bias in subadult skeletal samples , 1993 .

[16]  R. Illingworth.  Control of growth. , 1982, Archives of disease in childhood.

[17]  C. Moorrees,et al.  Age Variation of Formation Stages for Ten Permanent Teeth , 1963, Journal of dental research.

[18]  D. De Leo,et al.  Third mandibular molar radiological development as an indicator of chronological age in a European population. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[19]  T. D. Stewart,et al.  New Developments in Evaluating Evidence from the Skeleton , 1963, Journal of dental research.

[20]  S. Black,et al.  The Juvenile Skeleton , 2004 .

[21]  G. Willems,et al.  Third molar root development in relation to chronological age: a large sample sized retrospective study. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[22]  Douglas H. Ubelaker,et al.  Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation , 1999 .

[23]  C. Lovejoy,et al.  Long bone growth velocity in the Libben population , 1990, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[24]  K. Haavikko.  Tooth formation age estimated on a few selected teeth. A simple method for clinical use. , 1974, Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia.

[25]  J. Wit,et al.  Catch-up growth. , 1997, Endocrine reviews.

[26]  L. Kullman,et al.  Root development of the lower third molar and its relation to chronological age. , 1992, Swedish dental journal.

[27]  Louise Scheuer,et al.  Age Changes in the Clavicle: from the Early Neonatal Period to Skeletal Maturity , 1996 .

[28]  E. F. Harris,et al.  The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[29]  N Lynnerup,et al.  Intra- and interobserver error of the Greulich-Pyle method as used on a Danish forensic sample. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[30]  K. Haavikko,et al.  The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study. , 1970, Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia = Finska tandlakarsallskapets forhandlingar.

[31]  Nortjé Cj.  The permanent mandibular third molar. Its value in age determination. , 1983 .

[32]  Mary E. Lewis.  The Bioarchaeology of Children: The bioarchaeology of children , 2006 .

[33]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Skeletal growth of the protohistoric Arikara. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[34]  R. Mensforth.  Relative tibia long bone growth in the Libben and Bt-5 prehistoric skeletal populations. , 1985, American journal of physical anthropology.

[35]  U. Hägg,et al.  The accuracy and precision of the third mandibular molar as an indicator of chronological age. , 1991, Swedish dental journal.