Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.

PURPOSE To examine our experience of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in the pediatric population. METHODS From November 2001 to June 2009, 112 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of symptomatic or radiographic UPJO. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were followed at regular intervals with imaging and symptom assessment. Failure was defined as inability to complete the intended procedure, persistent flank pain, radiographic evidence of obstruction, or the need for definitive adjunctive procedures. RESULTS Mean patient age was 9.4 years (0.2-20.5 years), and follow-up was available on all 112 patients with a mean duration of 15.3 months (0.6-84.5 months). There was one open conversion in the series. Mean operative time was 254 minutes (102-525 minutes). There was one minor intraoperative complication reported (0.8%). There were 12 (10.8%) postoperative complications; most were relatively minor with complete resolution and without long-term sequelae. Postoperative ultrasonography has been performed in 102 patients, with 99 (97%) patients demonstrating improvement of the UPJO. Three patients (3%) continued to have symptomatic and/or radiographic evidence of obstruction that necessitated the need for adjunctive procedures, which included laser endopyelotomy in 2 patients, and a re-do open pyeloplasty in 1 patient. Of those cases that were completed laparoscopicaly, the overall success rate was 97.2%. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJO in the pediatric population is technically challenging; however, with experience, one can expect excellent success rates comparable to open pyeloplasty, with minor complications with reasonable operative times.

[1]  F. Varlet,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for repair of pelviureteric junction obstruction in children. , 2009, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[2]  P. Casale Robotic pyeloplasty in the pediatric population , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  B. Kropp,et al.  Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[4]  P. Noh,et al.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[5]  Y. Aigrain,et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[6]  A. El-Ghoneimi Laparoscopic management of hydronephrosis in children , 2004, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  Arthur D. Smith,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? , 2004, Current opinion in urology.

[8]  A. Hemal,et al.  Cost‐effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Single center experience , 2003, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[9]  Benjamin R. Lee,et al.  Practice trends in contemporary management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2003, Urology.

[10]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[11]  H L Tan,et al.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[12]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[13]  A. Retik,et al.  Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[14]  C. Peters Laparoscopy in pediatric urology , 2004, Urology.

[15]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.