Beam Bounding Box - a novel approach for beam concept modeling and optimization handling

Simplified models of the vehicle structure are often used during the concept phase of vehicle development to improve the Noise, Vibration and Harshness (NVH) performance. Together with the structural joints and panels, beams are one of the constituent parts of these models. There are different approaches for their modeling and optimization handling, which however are either not able to maintain the similarity with the detailed Finite Element (FE) model (reference and/or optimized) or suffering some flexibility and performance issues. The objective of the current work is to develop and validate a new method which is an improved alternative of the existing approaches. It keeps the reference cross-sectional shapes of all 1D beams, but when each of them is rescaled during optimization, the beam is represented by means of generic cross-sectional properties. Thus a lighter and simpler representation of the concept beams is created and at the same time the connection with the detailed FE model is not broken. The feasibility of the approach is successfully verified for a set of representative beam cross-sections and then for an industrial case study. Its benefit in terms of computational time is also demonstrated. The proposed method can be easily implemented and then applied to make concept modeling for the vehicle structure faster and more flexible.

[1]  G. Box,et al.  Response Surfaces, Mixtures and Ridge Analyses , 2007 .

[2]  Stijn Donders,et al.  Advanced Vehicle Body Concept Modeling Approach Using Reduced Models of Beams and Joints , 2010 .

[3]  Niccolò Baldanzini,et al.  Designing the Dynamic Behavior of an Engine Suspension System Through Genetic Algorithms , 2001 .

[4]  T. M. Cameron,et al.  Optimization of frame structures with flexible joints , 2000 .

[5]  Young-Pil Park,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUTOMOTIVE JOINT MODEL USING AN ANALYTICALLY BASED FORMULATION , 1999 .

[6]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Effect of member length on the parameter estimates of joints , 1998 .

[7]  Stijn Donders,et al.  Simplified modelling of joints and beam-like structures for BIW optimization in a concept phase of the vehicle design process , 2009 .

[8]  Stijn Donders,et al.  A database framework for industrial vehicle body concept modelling , 2010 .

[9]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[10]  Stijn Donders.  Computer-Aided Engineering Methodologies for Robust Automotive NVH Design (Simulatiemethoden voor robuust vibro-akoestisch ontwerp van voertuigen) , 2008 .

[11]  Efstratios Nikolaidis,et al.  Design of automotive joints: Using neural networks and optimization to translate performance requirements to physical design parameters , 1996 .

[12]  Luohui Long,et al.  Design-Oriented Translators for Automotive Joints , 1998 .

[13]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[14]  Glen Prater,et al.  Finite element concept modelling methodologies for pickup truck boxes , 2010 .

[15]  Stijn Donders,et al.  A reduced beam and joint concept modeling approach to optimize global vehicle body dynamics , 2009 .

[16]  Chengwu Duan,et al.  Beam element modelling of vehicle body-in-white applying artificial neural network , 2009 .

[17]  Paul Sas,et al.  Global static and dynamic car body stiffness based on a single experimental modal analysis test , 2010 .

[18]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[19]  D. Cox,et al.  The Theory of the Design of Experiments , 2000 .