At present it seems we have no answers to the tbllowing questions, which I deem to be both critical and basic: ¯ What are the fundamental distinctions that need to be made in general ontological categories ? ¯ How should we decide upon this set? ¯ How should they be defined? ¯ How can we move toward widespread agreement on these ? This paper proposes some means to find answers and some initial proposals. It suggests that it is time to attempt an experiment: to try to create a top-level ontology in a new way, by having a small group of experts slowly work toward agreement, one by one, on a set of fundamental ontological distinctions and the resulting categories. I believe achieving agreement on ten or twenty would be a remarkable accomplishment. I discuss some candidates and a possible modus operandi.
[1]
Thomas R. Gruber,et al.
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
,
1993,
Knowl. Acquis..
[2]
Ken Levine.
Review of Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems
,
1990,
AI Mag..
[3]
M. R. Genesereth,et al.
Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual
,
1992,
LICS 1992.
[4]
Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.
Building large knowledge-based systems
,
1989
.
[5]
Michael R. Genesereth,et al.
Knowledge Interchange Format
,
1991,
KR.
[6]
Timothy Lethbridge,et al.
CODE4: a unified system for managing conceptual knowledge
,
1995,
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..