Interactions between systemic problems in innovation systems: The case of energy-efficient houses in the Netherlands

The innovation systems approach offers a framework to identify what inhibits the generation, diffusion and implementation of innovations. It prescribes that interventions should target systemic problems that inhibit the system from functioning well. In current literature, systemic problems are typically identified independent from each other, after which interventions are formulated for each one separately. The following will argue that, next to the problems themselves, also the interactions between the problems are of key importance when designing intervention strategies. We analyze the Dutch energy-efficient housing innovation system and conclude that neglecting interactions between systemic problems may not only lead to inaccurate problem diagnosis, but also to ineffective or even counterproductive interventions.

[1]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics , 2015 .

[2]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden , 2001 .

[3]  Laura Kanto,et al.  Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the Finnish life sciences innovation system , 2013 .

[4]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Functionality of Innovation Systems as a Rationale for and Guide to Innovation Policy , 2010 .

[5]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Rationales for Public Policy Intervention in the Innovation Process: Systems of Innovation Approach , 2010 .

[6]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Sage 224 £19.99 0761973532 0761973532 [Formula: see text]. , 2006, Nurse researcher.

[7]  C. Edquist,et al.  Institutions and Organizations in Systems of Innovation , 2013 .

[8]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: Contributions and suggestions for research , 2011 .

[9]  C. Edquist Paradigmatic Shifts in National Innovation Systems , 2013 .

[10]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[11]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[12]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[13]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: An innovation systems analysis , 2012 .

[14]  F. Kern Ideas, Institutions, and Interests: Explaining Policy Divergence in Fostering ‘System Innovations’ towards Sustainability , 2011 .

[15]  Cristina Chaminade,et al.  Measuring systemic problems in National Innovation Systems. An application to Thailand , 2012 .

[16]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[17]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Why does Renewable Energy diffuse so slowly ? A review of innovation system problems , 2011 .

[18]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Conceptual confusion – an analysis of the meaning of concepts in technological innovation systems and sociological functionalism , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[20]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Albert Faber,et al.  Co-constructing a sustainable built environment in the Netherlands—Dynamics and opportunities in an environmental sectoral innovation system , 2013 .

[22]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: the case of UK energy policy , 2014 .

[23]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[24]  Leo Stroosnijder,et al.  Barriers and opportunities for innovation in rice production in the inland valleys of Benin , 2012 .

[25]  J. Mahoney,et al.  A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change , 2010 .

[26]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[27]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  A review of the European offshore wind innovation system , 2013 .

[28]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[29]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[30]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[31]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[32]  Kersti Karltorp,et al.  Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system - Challenges for policy intervention , 2013 .