A dynamical model is devised for a hydrologic system where unsaturated and saturated storage serve as the principal control on rainfall-runoff and where complex topography, drainage area, and variable depth of moisture penetration describe the flow geometry. The model is formed by direct integration of the local conservation equation with respect to the partial volumes occupied by unsaturated and saturated moisture storage, respectively. This yields an “integral-balance” model in just two state variables. The relationship of the dynamical model to field data in complex terrain is found through a joint probability density for terrain features. This serves as a “volume” weighting function to construct conditional averages for the state variables and fluxes over a specified range of terrain features. The scale of averaging could range from hillslopes to river basins. Two examples of the joint probability of terrain features (altitude and aspect) are demonstrated for Valley, Ridge, and Appalachian Plateau digital elevation models. The strategy of a dynamical model formed by conditional averages of state variables with respect to terrain features is proposed as a way of simplifying the dynamics while preserving the natural spatial and temporal scales contributing to runoff response. The parametric form of the storage-flux or constitutive relationships for the proposed model is determined from numerical experiments in a simple hillslope flow geometry. The results show that a competitive relation exists between unsaturated and saturated storage except for the lowest precipitation rates. Saturation overland flow is proposed to be a storage-feedback relation. Solutions to the integral-balance model are presented in terms of the phase portrait, which represents all possible solution trajectories in state-space. The timing and magnitude of peaks in the runoff hydrograph from pulse-type input events demonstrate quick flow from near-stream saturated storage, saturation overland flow including rejected rainfall (storage-feedback), and late-time infiltration from upslope subsurface flow.
[1]
N. Crawford,et al.
DIGITAL SIMULATION IN HYDROLOGY' STANFORD WATERSHED MODEL 4
,
1966
.
[2]
H. Geering,et al.
Estimating steady infiltration rate times for infiltrometers and permeameters
,
1990
.
[3]
Alberto Malinverno,et al.
The length‐scaling properties of topography
,
1994
.
[4]
R. Allan Freeze,et al.
Three-Dimensional, Transient, Saturated-Unsaturated Flow in a Groundwater Basin
,
1971
.
[5]
C. Duffy,et al.
SELF-AFFINE SCALING AND SUBSURFACE RESPONSE TO SNOWMELT IN STEEP TERRAIN
,
1991
.
[6]
C. Duffy,et al.
Monthly temperature and precipitation fields on a storm‐facing mountain front: Statistical structure and empirical parameterization
,
1993
.
[7]
Roland W. Jeppson,et al.
Solution of a Two-Dimensional, Steady-State Watershed Flow System Part I. Description of Mathematical Model
,
1972
.
[8]
Keith Beven,et al.
Runoff Production and Flood Frequency in Catchments of Order n: An Alternative Approach
,
1986
.
[9]
R. Byron Bird.
The equations of change and the macroscopic mass, momentum, and energy balances
,
1957
.
[10]
A. N. Strahler.
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS APPLIED TO FLUVIALLY ERODED LANDFORMS
,
1958
.
[11]
Yeh,et al.
FEMWATER: A finite element model of WATER flow through saturated-unsaturated porous media: First revision
,
1980
.
[12]
W. Langbein,et al.
Topographic characteristics of drainage basins
,
1947
.
[13]
James C. I. Dooge,et al.
Linear Theory of Hydrologic Systems
,
1973
.
[14]
Garrison Sposito,et al.
Steady groundwater flow as a dynamical system
,
1994
.
[15]
E. O'Loughlin,et al.
Saturation regions in catchments and their relations to soil and topographic properties
,
1981
.