Effects of operation temperature and reactant gas humidity levels on performance of PEM fuel cells

In this study, the effects of operation conditions on the performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell are investigated and the results are presented together with a comprehensive literature review on the related topics. The cells with 25cm2 active area are tested for different inlet gas humidification levels and inlet temperatures, operating temperatures and oxidant type. The cells are characterized by the performance curves together with the cell resistance measurements. The results indicate that the humidification of the inlet gases positively affect the cell performance. However, the improvement in the cell performance is higher when the cathode gas is humidified. In addition, the operating temperature and the inlet gas temperatures are found to be the most significant parameters. The cell performance tends to increase significantly with increasing the operating and inlet gas temperatures. The effect of the oxidant type is also considered and the cell tested with pure oxygen shows slightly higher performance.

[1]  M. Tohidi,et al.  Effect of primary parameters on the performance of PEM fuel cell , 2010 .

[2]  Soosan Rowshanzamir,et al.  Effects of operating parameters on performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[3]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Effect of contaminants on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2011 .

[4]  Harvey G. Stenger,et al.  Flow rate and humidification effects on a PEM fuel cell performance and operation , 2007 .

[5]  Hui Xu,et al.  Analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell polarization losses at elevated temperature 120 °C and reduced relative humidity , 2007 .

[6]  K. Hsueh,et al.  Enhancement of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance by titanium-coated anode gas diffusion layer , 2014 .

[7]  W. Yan,et al.  Effects of operating conditions on cell performance of PEM fuel cells with conventional or interdigitated flow field , 2006 .

[8]  Steffen Møller-Holst,et al.  Effect of gas composition and gas utilisation on the dynamic response of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2008 .

[9]  Andrew Dicks,et al.  Non precious metal catalysts for the PEM fuel cell cathode , 2012 .

[10]  James M. Fenton,et al.  Operation of Nafion®-based PEM fuel cells with no external humidification: influence of operating conditions and gas diffusion layers , 2004 .

[11]  Mathias Schulze,et al.  A review of platinum-based catalyst layer degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2009 .

[12]  I. Kevrekidis,et al.  Oxygen mass transport limitations at the cathode of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2011 .

[13]  T. Ohsaka,et al.  Exploring the effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical relative humidity on the performance of H2/air PEM fuel cell at different temperatures , 2007 .

[14]  Lin Wang,et al.  A parametric study of PEM fuel cell performances , 2003 .

[15]  Trung Van Nguyen,et al.  Current distribution in PEM fuel cells. Part 2: Air operation and temperature effect , 2005 .

[16]  H. Toghiani,et al.  Steady state and dynamic performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) under various operating conditions and load changes , 2006 .

[17]  Nam Hoon Kim,et al.  Polymer membranes for high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell : recent advances and challenges , 2011 .

[18]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Humidity of reactant fuel on the cell performance of PEM fuel cell with baffle-blocked flow field designs , 2006 .

[19]  K. Min,et al.  Experimental investigation of dynamic responses of a transparent PEM fuel cell to step changes in cell current density with operating temperature , 2008 .

[20]  H. Chu,et al.  Effects of cathode humidification on the gas-liquid interface location in a PEM fuel cell , 2006 .

[21]  S. Dutta,et al.  Numerical prediction of mass-exchange between cathode and anode channels in a PEM fuel cell , 2001 .

[22]  O. Barbera,et al.  Effect of operative conditions on a PEFC stack performance , 2008 .

[23]  Ozan Erdinc,et al.  Recent trends in PEM fuel cell-powered hybrid systems: Investigation of application areas, design architectures and energy management approaches , 2010 .

[24]  Guang-Yi Cao,et al.  Modeling and control of PEMFC based on least squares support vector machines , 2006 .

[25]  S. Chan,et al.  Matching of critical parameters in a small non-pressurized non-humidified PEMFC stack , 2006 .

[26]  Kamel Halouani,et al.  Two-dimensional modeling of electrochemical and transport phenomena in the porous structures of a PEMFC , 2009 .

[27]  Qifei Jian,et al.  Influences of gas relative humidity on the temperature of membrane in PEMFC with interdigitated flow field , 2014 .

[28]  Xuan Cheng,et al.  PEM fuel cells operated at 0% relative humidity in the temperature range of 23–120 °C , 2007 .

[29]  Sunhoe Kim,et al.  Effects of humidity and temperature on a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack , 2008 .

[30]  Mehdi Mortazavi,et al.  Two-phase flow pressure drop in flow channels of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Review of experimental approaches , 2015 .

[31]  Siew-Chong Tan,et al.  A theoretical study of inlet relative humidity control in PEM fuel cell , 2011 .

[32]  Hui Li,et al.  PEM fuel cell relative humidity (RH) and its effect on performance at high temperatures , 2008 .

[33]  Amaël Caillard,et al.  Improvement of proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrical performance by optimization of operating parameters and electrodes preparation , 2007 .

[34]  S. Litster,et al.  PEM fuel cell electrodes , 2004 .

[35]  Ayhan Albostan,et al.  Enhancement of PEM fuel cell performance at higher temperatures and lower humidities by high performance membrane electrode assembly based on Nafion/zeolite membrane , 2015 .

[36]  Waldemar Bujalski,et al.  High temperature (HT) polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) – A review , 2013 .

[37]  Xuan Liu,et al.  Flow dynamic characteristics in flow field of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2008 .

[38]  Nathan P. Siegel,et al.  On the influence of temperature on PEM fuel cell operation , 2006 .

[39]  James M. Fenton,et al.  Investigation of membrane property and fuel cell behavior with sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) electrolyte: Temperature and relative humidity effects , 2005 .

[40]  Akeel A. Shah,et al.  Recent trends and developments in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell modelling , 2011 .

[41]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Effects of cathode open area and relative humidity on the performance of air-breathing polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2006 .

[42]  Ay Su,et al.  Development and testing of a hybrid system with a sub-kW open-cathode type PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell stack , 2014 .

[43]  Ay Su,et al.  Numerical prediction of concentration and current distributions in PEMFC , 2005 .

[44]  K. Kang,et al.  Effects of inlet relative humidity (RH) on the performance of a high temperature-proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC) , 2014 .

[45]  J. Andrews,et al.  The potential of using nanofluids in PEM fuel cell cooling systems: A review , 2015 .

[46]  I. Eroglu,et al.  Effects of sulfonated polyether-etherketone (SPEEK) and composite membranes on the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance , 2009 .

[47]  E. Chalkova,et al.  Effect of TiO2 Surface Properties on Performance of Nafion-Based Composite Membranes in High Temperature and Low Relative Humidity PEM Fuel Cells , 2005 .

[48]  Serguei N. Lvov,et al.  Nafion ∕ TiO2 Proton Conductive Composite Membranes for PEMFCs Operating at Elevated Temperature and Reduced Relative Humidity , 2005 .

[49]  Aimy Bazylak,et al.  Liquid water visualization in PEM fuel cells: A review , 2009 .

[50]  José C. Páscoa,et al.  Analysis of PEM (Polymer Electrolyte Membrane) fuel cell cathode two-dimensional modeling , 2014 .

[51]  D. Wilkinson,et al.  A critical review of two-phase flow in gas flow channels of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2010 .

[52]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effect of humidity of reactants on the cell performance of PEM fuel cells with parallel and interdigitated flow field designs , 2008 .

[53]  S. Kandlikar,et al.  Thermal management issues in a PEMFC stack – A brief review of current status , 2009 .

[54]  T. Abe,et al.  Study of PEFCs by AC Impedance, Current Interrupt, and Dew Point Measurements I. Effect of Humidity in Oxygen Gas , 2004 .

[55]  Keith Scott,et al.  A two-phase flow and non-isothermal agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell , 2014 .

[56]  Biao Zhou,et al.  Along‐channel mathematical modelling for proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2005 .

[57]  In-Hwan Oh,et al.  Effect of the ionomers in the electrode on the performance of PEMFC under non-humidifying conditions , 2004 .

[58]  Keith Scott,et al.  Modelling and experimental validation of a high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2007 .

[59]  A. Su,et al.  Parametric investigation to enhance the performance of a PBI-based high-temperature PEMFC , 2014 .

[60]  G. Anilkumar,et al.  Proton conducting phosphated zirconia–sulfonated polyether sulfone nanohybrid electrolyte for low humidity, wide-temperature PEMFC operation , 2006 .

[61]  Alfredo Iranzo,et al.  Investigation of the liquid water distributions in a 50 cm2 PEM fuel cell: Effects of reactants relative humidity, current density, and cathode stoichiometry , 2015 .

[62]  Jiujun Zhang,et al.  A review of accelerated stress tests of MEA durability in PEM fuel cells , 2009 .

[63]  Jenn-Kun Kuo,et al.  Three-dimensional numerical analysis of PEM fuel cells with straight and wave-like gas flow fields channels , 2008 .

[64]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Effect of Relative Humidity on Oxygen Reduction Kinetics in a PEMFC , 2005 .

[65]  U. Wagner,et al.  Experimental analysis of water management in a self-humidifying polymer electrolyte fuel cell stack , 2004 .

[66]  B. Yi,et al.  AC impedance characteristics of a 2 kW PEM fuel cell stack under different operating conditions and load changes , 2007 .

[67]  F. Barbir,et al.  Maintaining desired level of relative humidity throughout a fuel cell with spatially variable heat r , 2011 .

[68]  Hui Li,et al.  A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell durability test protocols , 2011 .