The trials and tribulations of the Village Energy Security Programme (VESP) in India

The Indian Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) launched the Village Energy Security Programme (VESP) in 2004 but discontinued it during the 12th Five Year Plan, starting in 2012, after a series of unexpected challenges. Planners structured the program so that a village energy committee (VEC) ran a decentralized village program involving biomass gasifiers, straight vegetable oil (SVO) systems, biogas plants, and improved cookstoves. This suite of technologies was intended to produce electricity and thermal energy to meet the “total energy requirements” of rural communities. At the end of January 2011, a total of 79 VESP projects were sanctioned in 9 states and 65 of these projects were fully commissioned, yet more than half were not operational. The MNRE envisaged that the VESP would provide energy services to eradicate poverty, improve health, reduce drudgery, enhance education, raise agricultural productivity, create employment, generate income, and reduce migration. However, VESP projects have had limited success, and the trials and tribulations of the VESP offers important lessons for policymakers launching rural energy programs in India and other developing economies.

[1]  P. Balachandra,et al.  Modern energy access to all in rural India: An integrated implementation strategy , 2011 .

[2]  Ambuj D. Sagar,et al.  Scaling up biomass gasifier use: an application-specific approach , 2006 .

[3]  A. Chaurey,et al.  Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices , 2011 .

[4]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Energy access problem of the poor in India: Is rural electrification a remedy? , 2006 .

[5]  Snigdha Chakrabarti,et al.  Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region-a case study in an island , 2002 .

[6]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  What moves and works: Broadening the consideration of energy poverty , 2012 .

[7]  Andreas Kemmler,et al.  Factors influencing household access to electricity in India , 2007 .

[8]  P. Mohanty,et al.  Electricity access for geographically disadvantaged rural communities—technology and policy insights , 2004 .

[9]  Rangan Banerjee,et al.  Comparison of options for distributed generation in India , 2006 .

[10]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  The Indian National Initiative for Advanced Biomass Cookstoves: The benefits of clean combustion , 2010 .

[11]  Aie.  World Energy Outlook 2011 , 2011 .

[12]  I. Rehman,et al.  Understanding the political economy and key drivers of energy access in addressing national energy access priorities and policies , 2012 .

[13]  Avinash Chandra,et al.  Household energy consumption pattern and socio-cultural dimensions associated with it: A case study of rural Haryana, India , 2009 .

[14]  Tushar Jash,et al.  Sustainability of decentralized woodfuel-based power plant: an experience in India , 2004 .

[15]  Vijay Modi,et al.  Improving Access to Modern Energy Services: Insights from Case Studies , 2012 .

[16]  Debajit Palit,et al.  Sustainable model for financial viability of decentralized biomass gasifier based power projects , 2011 .

[17]  B. Sovacool.  The political economy of energy poverty: A review of key challenges , 2012 .

[18]  Pinakeswar Mahanta,et al.  Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: The Indian perspective , 2010 .

[19]  L. Srivastava,et al.  Energy access: Revelations from energy consumption patterns in rural India , 2012 .

[20]  Benjamin Sovacool.  Deploying Off-Grid Technology to Eradicate Energy Poverty , 2012, Science.

[21]  John Byrne,et al.  Energy-microfinance intervention for below poverty line households in India , 2009 .