Characterization of Probiotic Properties of Enterococcus faecium NHRD IHARA Isolated from Porcine Feces
暂无分享,去创建一个
F. Morimatsu | F. Arakawa | Shengbin Rao | T. Fujimura | H. Murakami | Shin Sukegawa | Yasuhiro Ihara
[1] F. Morimatsu,et al. Isolation, characterization, and effect of administration in vivo, a novel probiotic strain from pig feces. , 2013, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.
[2] W. MacNaughton,et al. Probiotic bacteria and intestinal epithelial barrier function. , 2010, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.
[3] P. Qian,et al. Conservative Fragments in Bacterial 16S rRNA Genes and Primer Design for 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplicons in Metagenomic Studies , 2009, PloS one.
[4] N. Gagnon,et al. Administration of Pediococcus acidilactici or Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii modulates development of porcine mucosal immunity and reduces intestinal bacterial translocation after Escherichia coli challenge. , 2009, Journal of animal science.
[5] Kenji Matsumoto,et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus casei Suppress Escherichia coli-Induced Chemokine Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells , 2008, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.
[6] H. Lillehoj,et al. Salmonella Enteritidis–Induced Alteration of Inflammatory CXCL Chemokine Messenger-RNA Expression and Histologic Changes in the Ceca of Infected Chicks , 2008, Avian diseases.
[7] D. Laubitz,et al. Competition of Lactobacillus paracasei with Salmonella enterica for Adhesion to Caco-2 Cells , 2008, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.
[8] A. Horii,et al. Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) Bind to Human B- or H-Antigens Expressed on Intestinal Mucosa , 2006, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.
[9] D. McKay,et al. Probiotics prevent bacterial translocation and improve intestinal barrier function in rats following chronic psychological stress , 2006, Gut.
[10] M. Nader-Macías,et al. Influence of probiotic vaginal lactobacilli on in vitro adhesion of urogenital pathogens to vaginal epithelial cells , 2006, Letters in applied microbiology.
[11] Beatrice Vitali,et al. Real-time PCR quantification of bacterial adhesion to Caco-2 cells: competition between bifidobacteria and enteropathogens. , 2005, Research in microbiology.
[12] S. McColl,et al. Control of Salmonella dissemination in vivo by macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3α/CCL20 , 2004, Laboratory Investigation.
[13] A. Ouwehand,et al. Adhesion Properties of Enterococci to Intestinal Mucus of Different Hosts , 2004, Veterinary Research Communications.
[14] A. Servin,et al. Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. , 2004, FEMS microbiology reviews.
[15] N. Pellegrini,et al. A fluorescence‐based method for the detection of adhesive properties of lactic acid bacteria to Caco‐2 cells , 2004, Letters in applied microbiology.
[16] Kazuya Saito,et al. A New Assay Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) to Determine Binding of the Lactobacillus acidophilus Group to Human Colonic Mucin , 2004, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.
[17] K. Bost,et al. Bacterium-Induced CXCL10 Secretion by Osteoblasts Can Be Mediated in Part through Toll-Like Receptor 4 , 2002, Infection and Immunity.
[18] T. Toba,et al. Inhibition of adhesion of food‐borne pathogens to Caco‐2 cells by Lactobacillus strains , 2001, Journal of applied microbiology.
[19] A. Servin,et al. Antagonistic Activity of Lactobacillus acidophilus LB against Intracellular Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Infecting Human Enterocyte-Like Caco-2/TC-7 Cells , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
[20] R. Moxley,et al. Comparative pathology of bacterial enteric diseases of swine. , 1999, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.
[21] W. Hryniewicz,et al. Binding of Extracellular Matrix Proteins by Enterococci , 1997, Current Microbiology.