Implementation of an automated system for monitoring adherence to hemodialysis treatment: A report of seven years of experience

OBJECTIVE In this paper we present the clinical deployment and evaluation of a computerized system, EMOSTAT, aimed at improving the quality of hemodialysis sessions. EMOSTAT automatically imports data from the hemodialysis monitoring software tools and analyzes the delivered treatment looking at six clinically relevant parameters. Failures-to-adhere (FtAs) to the planned treatment are detected and reported to the care-givers. METHODS EMOSTAT has been used for more than seven years in the management of a dialysis service located in Mede, Italy. A total of 72 patients were monitored and 21251 dialyses were collected. Data analysis is performed on the periods 2002-2005 and 2005-2008, corresponding to two different software releases. RESULTS The system had been exploited into everyday clinical practice for the entire considered period. The number of FtAs significantly decreased along the first period: the bulk blood flow FtAs decreased after the introduction of the system. Hemodialysis sessions lasted longer in the second period. Co-occurring FtAs, highlighting the presence of complex FtAs patterns, were also detected. CONCLUSIONS EMOSTAT provides an effective way to re-focus the attention of the dialysis department on the treatment plan and on its implementation. The automatic data collection and the design philosophy of EMOSTAT allowed the routine use of the system.

[1]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  S. Davidson,et al.  Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system. , 2004, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  Maria Alquist,et al.  Treatment Mapping – A Systematic Methodology to Assess Quality, Efficiency and Variability in the Hemodialysis Delivery Process , 2008, Blood Purification.

[4]  L. Rosales,et al.  Arterial line pressure control enhanced extracorporeal blood flow prescription in hemodialysis patients , 2008, BMC nephrology.

[5]  O. Ifudu.  The Concept of “Dry Weight” in Maintenance Hemodialysis: Flaws in Clinical Application , 1996, The International journal of artificial organs.

[6]  N. Levin,et al.  Consequences of overhydration and the need for dry weight assessment. , 2008, Contributions to nephrology.

[7]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Use of information and communication technologies to support effective work practice innovation in the health sector: a multi-site study , 2009, BMC health services research.

[8]  C. Ronco.  Can Information Technology Help in Acute Dialysis Therapy? , 2005, The International journal of artificial organs.

[9]  Kaija Saranto,et al.  Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  B. Charra,et al.  Fluid balance, dry weight, and blood pressure in dialysis , 2007, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[11]  C. Tetta,et al.  Dialysis Prescription: A Modifiable Risk Factor for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients , 2010, Blood Purification.

[12]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  Determinants of Clinical Information System Post-Adoption Success , 2010, MedInfo.

[13]  R Bellazzi,et al.  Mining health care administrative data with temporal association rules on hybrid events. , 2011, Methods of information in medicine.

[14]  Eli Arild,et al.  Telemedicine in haemodialysis: a university department and two remote satellites linked together as one common workplace , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  Ryo Yamada,et al.  Development of a computer-aided diagnosis system for a new modality of renal replacement therapy: an integrated approach combining both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis , 2005, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  R. Fluck,et al.  Analysis of factors associated with variability in haemodialysis adequacy. , 2004, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[18]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Rethinking clinical organisational structures: An attitude survey of doctors, nurses and allied health staff in clinical directorates , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[19]  Victor E. Pollak,et al.  Effect of electronic patient record use on mortality in End Stage Renal Disease, a model chronic disease: retrospective analysis of 9 years of prospectively collected data , 2007, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[20]  W B Runciman,et al.  Towards safer, better healthcare: harnessing the natural properties of complex sociotechnical systems , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[21]  R. Wolfe,et al.  The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): An international hemodialysis study , 2000 .

[22]  B. Carter,et al.  Adherence in patients on dialysis: strategies for success. , 2007, Nephrology nursing journal : journal of the American Nephrology Nurses' Association.

[23]  Maria Teresa Parisotto,et al.  Treatment data during pediatric home peritoneal teledialysis , 2003, Pediatric Nephrology.

[24]  S K Mun,et al.  Telemedicine: emerging e-medicine. , 1999, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[25]  C. Anandan,et al.  The impact of eHealth on the quality & safety of healthcare: a systematic overview & synthesis of the literature , 2008 .

[26]  Riccardo Bellazzi,et al.  Improving Dialysis Services through Information Technology: From Telemedicine to Data Mining , 2001, MedInfo.

[27]  F. Port,et al.  Noncompliance in hemodialysis: predictors and survival analysis. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[28]  P. Vespa,et al.  Multimodality monitoring and telemonitoring in neurocritical care: from microdialysis to robotic telepresence , 2005, Current opinion in critical care.

[29]  C. Anandan,et al.  The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview , 2011, PLoS medicine.

[30]  P Mattioli,et al.  Practical evaluation of standard-based low-cost video conferencing in telemedicine and epidemiological applications. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[31]  Lorraine R. Buis,et al.  Use of telemedicine for haemodialysis: perceptions of patients and health-care providers, and clinical effects , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[32]  P. Kerr,et al.  Associations of hemodialysis dose and session length with mortality risk in Australian and New Zealand patients. , 2006, Kidney international.

[33]  Christopher T. Chan,et al.  The user-centered approach in the development of a complex hospital-at-home intervention. , 2009, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[34]  J. Psarras,et al.  Telemedicine Technology and Applications for Home Hemodialysis , 1999, The International journal of artificial organs.

[35]  P. Mcclelland,et al.  The relationship between interdialytic weight gain and patient compliance. A single centred cohort study (n=21). , 2001, EDTNA/ERCA journal.

[36]  Jan Tore Lium,et al.  Research Paper: From the Front Line, Report from a Near Paperless Hospital: Mixed Reception Among Health Care Professionals , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[37]  Eiichi Nishida,et al.  Blood pressure monitoring by cellular telephone in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. , 2004, Advances in peritoneal dialysis. Conference on Peritoneal Dialysis.

[38]  F. Gotch.  The Basic, Quantifiable Parameter of Dialysis Prescription Is Kt/V Urea; Treatment Time Is Determined by the Ultrafiltration Requirement; All Three Parameters Are of Equal Importance , 2006, Blood Purification.

[39]  Hidetomo Nakamoto,et al.  Telemedicine System for Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis , 2007, Peritoneal dialysis international : journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

[40]  A. Localio,et al.  Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. , 2005 .

[41]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Nonadherence in hemodialysis: associations with mortality, hospitalization, and practice patterns in the DOPPS. , 2003, Kidney international.

[42]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Evaluation Methods in Biomedical Informatics , 2000 .

[43]  K. Meyers,et al.  USB drives for communication of medical information in a pediatric dialysis unit. , 2009, The Journal of pediatrics.

[44]  B. Charra,et al.  Importance of treatment time and blood pressure control in achieving long-term survival on dialysis. , 1996, American journal of nephrology.

[45]  C. Chazot.  Managing dry weight and hypertension in dialysis patients: still a challenge for the nephrologist in 2009? , 2009, Journal of nephrology.