Chemical mass balance source apportionment for combined PM2.5 measurements from U.S. non-urban and urban long-term networks☆

Abstract The Minnesota Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5) Source Apportionment Study was undertaken to explore the utility of PM2.5 mass, element, ion, and carbon measurements from long-term speciation networks for pollution source attribution. Ambient monitoring data at eight sites across the state were retrieved from the archives of the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) and the Speciation Trends Network (STN; part of the Chemical Speciation Network [CSN]) and analyzed by an Effective Variance – Chemical Mass Balance (EV-CMB) receptor model with region-specific geological source profiles developed in this study. PM2.5 was apportioned into contributions of fugitive soil dust, calcium-rich dust, taconite (low grade iron ore) dust, road salt, motor vehicle exhaust, biomass burning, coal-fired utility, and secondary aerosol. Secondary sulfate and nitrate contributed strongly (49–71% of PM2.5) across all sites and was dominant (≥60%) at IMPROVE sites. Vehicle exhausts accounted for 20–70% of the primary PM2.5 contribution, largely exceeding the proportion in the primary PM2.5 emission inventory. The diesel exhaust contribution was separable from the gasoline engine exhaust contribution at the STN sites. Higher detection limits for several marker elements in the STN resulted in non-detectable coal-fired boiler contributions which were detected in the IMPROVE data. Despite the different measured variables, analytical methods, and detection limits, EV-CMB results from a nearby IMPROVE-STN non-urban/urban sites showed similar contributions from regional sources – including fugitive dust and secondary aerosol. Seasonal variations of source contributions were examined and extreme PM2.5 episodes were explained by both local and regional pollution events.

[1]  J. Chow,et al.  Dilution-based emissions sampling from stationary sources: Part 1--Compact sampler methodology and performance. , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  The IMPROVE_A Temperature Protocol for Thermal/Optical Carbon Analysis: Maintaining Consistency with a Long-Term Database , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  John Bachmann The A&WMA 2007 Critical Review. Will the circle be unbroken: a history of the U.S. national ambient air quality standards , 2007 .

[4]  Sources of Fine Particulate Species in Ambient Air over Lake Champlain Basin, VT , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  Steven G. Brown,et al.  Analysis and Apportionment of Organic Carbon and Fine Particulate Matter Sources at Multiple Sites in the Midwestern United States , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Source Apportionment: Findings from the U.S. Supersites Program , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  L. Chen,et al.  Origins of fine aerosol mass in the Baltimore–Washington corridor: implications from observation, factor analysis, and ensemble air parcel back trajectories , 2002 .

[8]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Ammonium Nitrate, Nitric Acid, and Ammonia Equilibrium in Wintertime Phoenix, Arizona , 1994 .

[9]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Fine Particulate Matter Source Apportionment for the Chemical Speciation Trends Network Site at Birmingham, Alabama, Using Positive Matrix Factorization , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  A note on the equilibrium relationship between ammonia and nitric acid and particulate ammonium nitrate , 1979 .

[11]  Hans Moosmüller,et al.  Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  CMB SOURCE ApPORTIONMENT DURING REVEAL , 1997 .

[13]  Peter A. Scheff,et al.  Fine particulate source apportionment using data from the USEPA speciation trends network in Chicago, Illinois: Comparison of two source apportionment models , 2007 .

[14]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  A laboratory resuspension chamber to measure fugitive dust size distributions and chemical compositions , 1994 .

[15]  J. Chow,et al.  Dilution-Based Emissions Sampling from Stationary Sources: Part 2—Gas-Fired Combustors Compared with Other Fuel-Fired Systems , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  R. Henry Multivariate receptor modeling by N-dimensional edge detection , 2003 .

[17]  Weixiang Zhao,et al.  Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter for the Speciation Trends Network Site in Cleveland, OH , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[18]  L. Chen,et al.  Modeling reflectance and transmittance of quartz-fiber filter samples containing elemental carbon particles: Implications for thermal/optical analysis , 2004 .

[19]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Evaluation of organic markers for chemical mass balance source apportionment at the Fresno Supersite , 2006 .

[20]  P. Paatero,et al.  Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values† , 1994 .

[21]  R.K.M. Jayanty,et al.  PM2.5 Speciation Trends Network: Evaluation of Whole-System Uncertainties Using Data from Sites with Collocated Samplers , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[22]  P. Lioy,et al.  Profiles of organic particulate emissions from air pollution sources: status and needs for receptor source apportionment modeling. , 1986, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association.

[23]  J. Brook,et al.  Identification of the major sources contributing to PM2.5 observed in Toronto. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Evaluations of the Chemical Mass Balance Method for Determining Contributions of Gasoline and Diesel Exhaust to Ambient Carbonaceous Aerosols , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[25]  J. Chow,et al.  Moisture effects on carbon and nitrogen emission from burning of wildland biomass , 2010 .

[26]  John G. Watson,et al.  The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model , 1984 .

[27]  Steven G. Brown,et al.  Source Apportionment of Fine Particulate Matter in Phoenix, AZ, Using Positive Matrix Factorization , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[28]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE samples. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[29]  L. Chen,et al.  Methods to Assess Carbonaceous Aerosol Sampling Artifacts for IMPROVE and Other Long-Term Networks , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[30]  Hampden Kuhns,et al.  Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[31]  L. Chen,et al.  PM2.5 Source Apportionment: Reconciling Receptor Models for U.S. Nonurban and Urban Long-Term Networks , 2011, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[32]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Factor Analysis of Seattle Fine Particles , 2004 .

[33]  Use of Project MOHAVE Perfluorocarbon Tracer Data to Evaluate Source and Receptor Models , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[34]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Refining temperature measures in thermal/optical carbon analysis , 2005 .

[35]  L. Chen,et al.  Quantifying PM2.5 source contributions for the San Joaquin Valley with multivariate receptor models. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  L. H. Keith,et al.  Sampling and analysis of airborne pollutants , 1993 .

[37]  M. Andreae Soot Carbon and Excess Fine Potassium: Long-Range Transport of Combustion-Derived Aerosols , 1983, Science.

[38]  P. Hopke,et al.  Sources of fine particles in a rural midwestern U.S. area. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Philip K Hopke,et al.  Source Apportionment of Fine Particles in Washington, DC, Utilizing Temperature-Resolved Carbon Fractions , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[40]  M. F. Phillips,et al.  Separating carbonaceous aerosol source terms using thermal evolution, carbon isotopic measurements, and C/N/S determinations , 1984 .

[41]  W. Malm,et al.  Reconciliation and Interpretation of the Big Bend National Park Light Extinction Source Apportionment: Results from the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational Study—Part II , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[42]  J. Chow,et al.  Simulating Changes in Source Profiles from Coal-Fired Power Stations: Use in Chemical Mass Balance of PM2.5 in the Mount Zirkel Wilderness , 2002 .

[43]  P. Hopke,et al.  Estimation of Organic Carbon Blank Values and Error Structures of the Speciation Trends Network Data for Source Apportionment , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[44]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  Apportioning sources of PM2.5 in St. Louis, MO using speciation trends network data , 2006 .

[45]  Mark C. Green,et al.  Causes of Haze in the Columbia River Gorge , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[46]  Judith C. Chow,et al.  Characterization and source apportionment of atmospheric organic and elemental carbon during fall and winter of 2003 in Xi'an, China , 2005 .

[47]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[48]  J. Watson Visibility: Science and Regulation , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[49]  Philip K. Hopke,et al.  The use of constrained least-squares to solve the chemical mass balance problem , 1989 .

[50]  Tan Zhu,et al.  Receptor modeling application framework for particle source apportionment. , 2002, Chemosphere.

[51]  J. Chow,et al.  Quantification of PM 2.5 organic carbon sampling artifacts in US networks , 2010 .

[52]  C. Lewis,et al.  Source Apportionment of Phoenix PM2.5 Aerosol with the Unmix Receptor Model , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[53]  Nigel N Clark,et al.  Particulate matter: A strategic vision for transportation-related research. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.