Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Human Critical Area (HCA) in the “Three Water Lines” Region of Northwest China and the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors between 2000 and 2020

The Human Critical Area (HCA) is an area that characterizes the surface landscape created by human beings in the Anthropocene. Based on the signatures left by major human activities over the Earth′s surface, this research demarcates an arid inland region of Northwest China, the “Three Water Lines”, into four HCA types: Agricultural Area, Built-up Area, Ecological Area, and Bare Area. This paper explores the HCA′s distribution and changes in the “Three Water Lines” region between 2000 and 2020 with land use/cover data, as well as the impact of socioeconomic factors on the HCA dynamics with statistics sourcing from authoritative yearbooks. To achieve this, the Land Use Transition Matrix is used to investigate the changes in area and distribution, while binary linear regression and stepwise multiple linear regression are applied to examine the single and joint effects of the socioeconomic factors. The main findings are as follows: (i) The four HCA types are distinguished quantitatively and by their distribution patterns. Ecological Area and Bare Area cover most (more than 90% in total) of the territory with extensive and continuous distribution. Agricultural Area is mainly found on the eastern and western parts of the region, with flat terrain, abundant water resources, and moderate temperatures. Built-up Area is the most concentrated but has an unbalanced distribution and the lowest quantity. (ii) Despite some discernible spatial and quantity changes at regional and county levels between 2000 and 2020, the general characteristics in HCA’s structure and distribution pattern have mainly remained consistent. (iii) Transitions between HCA types occur constantly, and the primary source type of the transitions differs from one another. Ecological Area and Bare Area form the sources of the most evident transitions. (iv) Agricultural Area and Built-up Area are more prone influence from some socioeconomic dynamics. By contrast, there is no evidence that socioeconomic factors directly affect Bare Area. As the first empirical study of the newly conceived concept, Human Critical Area, this paper sheds light on the renovation of geographic traditions of studying the evolution of the human-environment system through the lens of human activities-driven landscape changes.

[1]  K. Kanniah,et al.  Land use and land cover change and its impact on river morphology in Johor River Basin, Malaysia , 2022, Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.

[2]  Tonghui Ding,et al.  Impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in ecologically fragile regions. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  L. Verchot,et al.  Impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on ecosystem services in the Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia , 2021, Ecosystem Services.

[4]  Qing Wang,et al.  Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of land use in Tibetan region: 1995–2025 , 2021, Earth Science Informatics.

[5]  A. Arènes Inside the Critical Zone , 2020 .

[6]  Chuanrong Zhang,et al.  Mechanism of regional land use transition in underdeveloped areas of China: A case study of northeast China , 2020 .

[7]  Thomas Opitz,et al.  Point-process based Bayesian modeling of space–time structures of forest fire occurrences in Mediterranean France , 2020, Spatial Statistics.

[8]  Z. Su,et al.  Impact of land use and land cover transitions and climate on evapotranspiration in the Lake Naivasha Basin, Kenya. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  G. Barron‐Gafford,et al.  Critical Zone Science in the Anthropocene: Opportunities for biogeographic and ecological theory and praxis to drive earth science integration , 2019, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment.

[10]  P. Bettinger,et al.  Land cover transitions in the United States South: 2007–2013 , 2019, Applied Geography.

[11]  Warren R. L. Cairns,et al.  Man's footprint on the Arctic environment as revealed by analysis of ice and snow , 2017 .

[12]  Shumin Zhang,et al.  Understanding Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics from 1976 to 2014 in Yellow River Delta , 2017 .

[13]  Mark A. Maslin,et al.  Involve social scientists in defining the Anthropocene , 2016, Nature.

[14]  C. Hamilton Define the Anthropocene in terms of the whole Earth , 2016, Nature.

[15]  Karen C. Seto,et al.  Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene , 2016 .

[16]  Dengsheng Lu,et al.  Remote sensing-based artificial surface cover classification in Asia and spatial pattern analysis , 2016, Science China Earth Sciences.

[17]  P. Tarolli,et al.  Human topographic signatures and derived geomorphic processes across landscapes , 2016 .

[18]  D. Richter,et al.  'One physical system': Tansley's ecosystem as Earth's critical zone. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[19]  Lawrence N. Hudson,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[20]  M. Maslin,et al.  Defining the Anthropocene , 2015, Nature.

[21]  R. Dirzo,et al.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene , 2014, Science.

[22]  A. B. Murphy Geography’s Crosscutting Themes: Golden Anniversary Reflections on “The Four Traditions of Geography” , 2014 .

[23]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Used planet: A global history , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Carole L. Crumley,et al.  The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship , 2011, AMBIO.

[25]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Interdisciplinary Sciences in a Global Network of Critical Zone Observatories , 2011 .

[26]  Erle C. Ellis Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[27]  Raghu Murtugudde,et al.  Regional Earth System prediction: a decision-making tool for sustainability? , 2009 .

[28]  Ranjeet John,et al.  Land cover/land use change in semi-arid Inner Mongolia: 1992–2004 , 2009 .

[29]  Susan L. Brantley,et al.  Crossing Disciplines and Scales to Understand the Critical Zone , 2007 .

[30]  S. Hanson Who Are “We”? An Important Question for Geography's Future , 2004, Annals of the Association of American Geographers.

[31]  Steven Dubowsky,et al.  Online terrain parameter estimation for wheeled mobile robots with application to planetary rovers , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[32]  Chang’an Li,et al.  Human impact on floods and flood disasters on the Yangtze River , 2001 .

[33]  J. W. Watson The Progress of Geography , 1953, Nature.

[34]  H. Lin Earth ’ s Critical Zone and hydropedology : concepts , characteristics , and advances , 2009 .