CPAP combined with oral appliance therapy reduces CPAP requirements and pharyngeal pressure swings in obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES Oral appliance (OA) therapy is the leading alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). It is well tolerated compared to CPAP. However, ≥50% of patients using OA therapy have incomplete resolution of their OSA. Combination therapy with CPAP and oral appliance (CPAP+OA) is a potential alternative for incomplete responders to OA therapy. This study aimed to determine the extent to which combination therapy reduces therapeutic CPAP requirements using gold standard physiological methodology in those who have an incomplete response to OA therapy alone. METHODS 16 incomplete responders (residual AHI> 10events/h) to a novel OA with a built-in oral airway were recruited (3F:13M, aged 31-65 years, BMI: 22-38kg/m2, residual AHI range 13-63events/h). Participants were fitted with a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, epiglottic pressure catheter and standard polysomnography equipment. CPAP titrations were performed during NREM supine sleep in each participant during 3 conditions (order randomized): 1) CPAP only, 2) CPAP+OA(oral airway open), and 3) CPAP+OA(oral airway closed). RESULTS OSA was resolved at pressures of 4±2 and 5±2cmH2O during CPAP+OA (oral airway open) and CPAP+OA (oral airway closed) conditions versus 8±2cmH2O during CPAP only (P<0.01). Negative epiglottic pressure swings in oral airway open and closed conditions were normalized to CPAP only levels (-2.5[-3.7,-2.6] vs. -2.3[-3.2,-2.4]vs. -2.1[-2.7,-2.3]cmH2O). CONCLUSIONS Combined CPAP and OA therapy reduces therapeutic CPAP requirements by 35-45% and minimizes epiglottic pressure swings. This combination may be a therapeutic alternative for patients with incomplete responses to OA therapy alone and those who cannot tolerate high CPAP levels.

[1]  D. Eckert,et al.  Efficacy of a Novel Oral Appliance and the Role of Posture on Nasal Resistance in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. , 2020, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[2]  D. Eckert,et al.  Combination therapy with mandibular advancement and expiratory positive airway pressure valves reduces obstructive sleep apnea severity. , 2019, Sleep.

[3]  J. Butler,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of mandibular advancement on upper airway collapsibility and muscle function in obstructive sleep apnea. , 2019, Sleep.

[4]  S. Chokroverty,et al.  The relationships between improvements in daytime sleepiness, fatigue and depression and psychomotor vigilance task testing with CPAP use in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. , 2018, Sleep medicine.

[5]  A. Polimeni,et al.  Difficult-to-treat OSAS: Combined continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement devices (MADs) therapy. A case report , 2018, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[6]  Chi-Ling Chen,et al.  Combining MAD and CPAP as an effective strategy for treating patients with severe sleep apnea intolerant to high-pressure PAP and unresponsive to MAD , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  Chinh D Nguyen,et al.  An automated and reliable method for breath detection during variable mask pressures in awake and sleeping humans , 2017, PloS one.

[8]  A. Wellman,et al.  Upper Airway Collapsibility (Pcrit) and Pharyngeal Dilator Muscle Activity are Sleep Stage Dependent. , 2016, Sleep.

[9]  H. Kerstjens,et al.  Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Oral Appliance Hybrid Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Patient Comfort, Compliance, and Preference: A Pilot Study , 2016 .

[10]  P. Cistulli,et al.  Efficacy versus Effectiveness in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: CPAP and Oral Appliances , 2015 .

[11]  P. Cistulli,et al.  Oral Appliance Treatment Response and Polysomnographic Phenotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. , 2015, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[12]  Kannan Ramar,et al.  Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring with Oral Appliance Therapy : An Update for 2015 , 2015 .

[13]  B. Singh,et al.  Management of severe obstructive sleep apnea using mandibular advancement devices with auto continuous positive airway pressures , 2015, Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society.

[14]  C. Kushida,et al.  Oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: an update. , 2014, Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

[15]  M. Braem,et al.  Objectively measured vs self-reported compliance during oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing. , 2013, Chest.

[16]  M. Matsuura,et al.  Oropharyngeal crowding and obesity as predictors of oral appliance treatment response to moderate obstructive sleep apnea. , 2013, Chest.

[17]  M. Braem,et al.  Objective measurement of compliance during oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing , 2012, Thorax.

[18]  F. Sériès,et al.  Impact of CPAP interface and mandibular advancement device on upper airway mechanical properties assessed with phrenic nerve stimulation in sleep apnea patients , 2012, Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology.

[19]  S. Isono,et al.  Obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea: Mechanisms for increased collapsibility of the passive pharyngeal airway , 2012, Respirology.

[20]  A. El‐Solh,et al.  Combined oral appliance and positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: a pilot study , 2011, Sleep and Breathing.

[21]  J. Tyrrell,et al.  Psychological variables as predictors of adherence to treatment by continuous positive airway pressure. , 2009, Sleep Medicine.

[22]  Marc Baltzan,et al.  Long-term compliance with continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. , 2008, Canadian respiratory journal.

[23]  P. Cistulli,et al.  Influence of nasal resistance on oral appliance treatment outcome in obstructive sleep apnea. , 2008, Sleep.

[24]  Conrad Iber,et al.  Evaluation of positive airway pressure treatment for sleep related breathing disorders in adults. , 2006, Sleep.

[25]  Max Hirshkowitz,et al.  Practice parameters for the use of continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure devices to treat adult patients with sleep-related breathing disorders. , 2006, Sleep.

[26]  K. Franklin,et al.  Mandibular advancement devices in 630 men and women with obstructive sleep apnea and snoring: tolerability and predictors of treatment success. , 2004, Chest.

[27]  Thomas Penzel,et al.  Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment on Blood Pressure in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea , 2003, Circulation.

[28]  M. Denbar A Case Study Involving the Combination Treatment of an Oral Appliance and Auto-Titrating CPAP Unit , 2002, Sleep and Breathing.

[29]  H. Tanzawa,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of mandibular advancement on pharyngeal mechanics and nocturnal oxygenation in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. , 2000, Chest.

[30]  I. Deary,et al.  Randomised placebo controlled trial of daytime function after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome , 1998, Thorax.

[31]  T. Nishino,et al.  Advancement of the mandible improves velopharyngeal airway patency. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  N J Douglas,et al.  Compliance with CPAP therapy in patients with the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. , 1994, Thorax.

[33]  C. Guilleminault,et al.  Compliance and side effects in sleep apnea patients treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. , 1989, The Western journal of medicine.

[34]  ColinE. Sullivan,et al.  REVERSAL OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNOEA BY CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE APPLIED THROUGH THE NARES , 1981, The Lancet.

[35]  E. Wolpert,et al.  The relation of eye movements, body motility, and external stimuli to dream content. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.