Effect of destructive pulse duration on the detection of myocardial perfusion in myocardial contrast echocardiography: In vitro and in vivo observations.

UNLABELLED Myocardial perfusion is detected with contrast echocardiography by comparing a contrast-enhanced image with a baseline obtained before contrast injection (true baseline) or after myocardial bubble destruction after a high-power destructive pulse (postdestructive pulse baseline). Although it is assumed that all bubbles are destroyed by a destructive pulse insuring optimal contrast detection, this assumption has not been tested. In 18 participants we compared the videointensity (VI) differences among the contrast-enhanced image, the postdestructive pulse baseline, and the true baseline using both triggered high-mechanical index imaging and real-time imaging. VI difference was significantly greater for the true baseline with both techniques at all ventricular levels. The benefit of using a true baseline was less when the duration of the destructive pulse was increased. Similarly, we quantified VI in a flow phantom using continuous Optison (commercially available perfluoropropane-filled albumin microbubbles) (Amersham, Princeton, NJ) infusion and variable durations of destructive pulses. VI decreased with the duration of the destructive pulse and reached a plateau after a duration of 8 to 15 frames. The plateau reached after a long destructive pulse was dependent on flow rate and concentration and never reached a true baseline, unless concentration (<100 microL/L) and flow rate (<0.5 cm/s) were very low. IN CONCLUSION (1) in clinical studies, the difference in VI between contrast-enhanced and baseline images is greater when true baseline is used; (2) the longer the destructive pulse, the closer the postdestructive pulse baseline to true baseline; and (3) this effect exists in all regions of the left ventricle.