Energy and chemical efficient nitrogen removal at a full-scale MBR water reuse facility

With stringent wastewater discharge limits on nitrogen and phosphorus, membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology is gaining popularity for advanced wastewater treatment due to higher effluent quality and smaller footprint. However, higher energy intensity required for MBR plants and increased operational costs for nutrient removal limit wide application of the MBR technology. Conventional nitrogen removal requires intensive energy inputs and chemical addition. There are drivers to search for new technology and process control strategies to treat wastewater with lower energy and chemical demand while still producing high quality effluent. The NPXpress is a patented technology developed by American Water engineers. This technology is an ultra-low dissolved oxygen (DO) operation for wastewater treatment and is able to remove nitrogen with less oxygen requirements and reduced supplemental carbon addition in MBR plants. Jefferson Peaks Water Reuse Facility in New Jersey employs MBR technology to treat municipal wastewater and was selected for the implementation of the NPXpress technology. The technology has been proved to consistently produce a high quality reuse effluent while reducing energy consumption and supplemental carbon addition by 59% and 100%, respectively. Lab-scale kinetic studies suggested that NPXpress promoted microorganisms with higher oxygen affinity. Process modelling was used to simulate treatment performance under NPXpress conditions and develop ammonia-based aeration control strategy. The application of the ammonia-based aeration control at the plant further reduced energy consumption by additional 9% and improved treatment performance with 35% reduction in effluent total nitrogen. The overall energy savings for Jefferson Peaks was $210,000 in four years since the implementation of NPXpress. This study provided an insight in design and operation of MBR plants with NPXpress technology and ultra-low DO operations.

[1]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Model evaluation of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a membrane bioreactor operated without an anoxic reactor , 2009 .

[2]  C. Schleper,et al.  Ammonia-oxidising archaea--physiology, ecology and evolution. , 2010, Advances in microbial physiology.

[3]  P. Dold,et al.  Ammonia‐Based Feedforward and Feedback Aeration Control in Activated Sludge Processes , 2014, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[4]  Yanjin Liu,et al.  Ammonia Oxidizing Archaea, AOA, Population and Kinetic Changes in a Full Scale Simultaneous Nitrogen and Phosphorous Removal MBR , 2011 .

[5]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse , 2002 .

[6]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Modeling and simulation of oxygen‐limited partial nitritation in a membrane‐assisted bioreactor (MBR) , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[7]  Tian-yin Huang,et al.  Review: Modeling of nitrogen removal and control strategy in continuous-flow-intermittent-aeration process , 2012 .

[8]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Exploring temporal variations of oxygen saturation constants of nitrifying bacteria. , 2007, Water research.

[9]  C. Brepols,et al.  An aeration energy model for an immersed membrane bioreactor. , 2008, Water research.

[10]  G. Guglielmi,et al.  Alternate anoxic/aerobic operation for nitrogen removal in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  David G. Wareham,et al.  COD, ammonia and dissolved oxygen time profiles in the simultaneous nitrification/denitrification process , 2005 .

[12]  Josip Ćurko,et al.  Nitrogen removal in submerged MBR with intermittent aeration , 2010 .

[13]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification coupled with phosphorus removal in an modified anoxic/oxic-membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR). , 2009 .

[14]  Y. Li,et al.  Simultaneous nitrification-denitrification achieved by an innovative internal-loop airlift MBR: comparative study. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Hongde Zhou,et al.  Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment , 2001 .

[16]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[17]  J.H.J.M. van der Graaf,et al.  Membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment and reuse , 2006 .