Numerical study on hypersonic nozzle-inlet starting characteristics in a shock tunnel

Abstract An unsteady viscous numerical simulation is performed to study the starting process of a hypersonic nozzle coupled with a simplified inlet model in a shock tunnel under the condition of inflow Mach number higher than the design value. And the effect of the initial backpressure of test section in shock tunnel on the pulse-starting characteristics of the hypersonic nozzle-inlet is studied. It is found that the operation mode of inlet changes from local unstart to start with the initial backpressure decreasing. At high initial backpressure, two large separation bubbles are induced by the secondary shock at the nozzle walls, the separation induced shock waves repeat reflections between the nozzle walls and a shock train structure appears. The Mach number of the flow into the test section rises and falls repeatedly as a result of the presence of the successive shocks in the shock train structure. During the hypersonic nozzle-inlet starting process, a large separation bubble occurs at the forebody side and the inlet is choked. After the forebody shock moving close to the cowl lip, a bow shock is generated and moves before the cowl lip subsequently. Finally, the quasi-steady flowfield of the inlet is established with a bow shock before the cow lip and a subsonic region at the cowl side, namely the inlet is local unstarted. At low initial backpressure, the separation bubbles at the nozzle walls vanish and no shock train structure appears. Furthermore, an unsteady expansion wave may appear upstream of the secondary shock and the Mach number of the flow following the secondary shock is higher than that of the nozzle quasi-steady flow. The Mach number of the flow into the inlet increases to the maximum value quickly, the inlet starts successfully. The numerical results show that the inlet starts easier and faster with lower initial backpressure.

[1]  Numerical Simulation of Nozzle Starting Flow , 2016 .

[2]  Rabi Tahir,et al.  On Recent Developments Related to Flow Starting in Hypersonic Air Intakes , 2008 .

[3]  A. Hadjadj,et al.  Numerical study of the starting process in a supersonic nozzle , 2005 .

[4]  Mikhail N. Shneider,et al.  Nonequilibrium Magnetohydrodynamic Control of Turbojet and Ram/Scramjet Inlets , 2002 .

[5]  A. Hadjadj,et al.  Numerical simulation of transient supersonic nozzle flows , 2012 .

[6]  Kunyuan Zhang,et al.  Numerical investigation of 2-D hypersonic inlet starting characteristic caused by dynamic angle-of-attack , 2010 .

[7]  Daren Yu,et al.  Mechanism Study on Local Unstart of Hypersonic Inlet at High Mach Number , 2015 .

[8]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Accumulation of errors in numerical simulations of chemically reacting gas dynamics , 2015 .

[9]  K. Hannemann,et al.  Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet , 2013, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  Weixing Wang,et al.  Numerical study of unsteady starting characteristics of a hypersonic inlet , 2013 .

[11]  J. Wagner,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Unstart in an Inlet/Isolator Model in Mach 5 Flow , 2009 .

[12]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  Incipient thermal choking and stable shock-train formation in the heat-release region of a scramjet combustor. Part I: Shock-tunnel experiments , 2015 .

[13]  G. Jagadeesh,et al.  Studies on Unsteady Shock Interactions Near a Generic Scramjet Inlet , 2009 .

[14]  Mikhail N. Shneider,et al.  Modeling of plasma virtual shape control of ram/scramjet inlet and isolator , 2006 .

[15]  Ernesto Benini,et al.  Innovative Discrete-Vortex Model for Dynamic Stall Simulations , 2015 .

[16]  C. E. Smith,et al.  The starting process in a hypersonic nozzle , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Cong Wang,et al.  Mathematical modeling and rapid recognition of hypersonic inlet buzz , 2012 .

[18]  H. Tan,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Unstart Process of a Generic Hypersonic Inlet , 2011 .

[19]  Erich Schülein,et al.  Skin Friction and Heat Flux Measurements in Shock Boundary Layer Interaction Flows , 2006 .

[20]  Yunfeng Liu,et al.  Starting Process in a Large-Scale Shock Tunnel , 2016 .

[21]  Kazuyoshi Takayama,et al.  Numerical simulations of nozzle starting process , 1999 .

[22]  J. Qin,et al.  Novel Oscillatory Patterns of Hypersonic Inlet Buzz , 2012 .

[23]  C R McClinton,et al.  Airbreathing Hypersonic Technology Vision Vehicles and Development Dreams , 1999 .

[24]  Andrea Passaro,et al.  Ethylene Flame Dynamics and Inlet Unstart in a Model Scramjet , 2014 .

[25]  Qing Xiao,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of jet mixing from a shock-containing nozzle , 2009 .

[26]  S. Im,et al.  Unstart phenomena induced by mass addition and heat release in a model scramjet , 2016, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  Hui-jun Tan,et al.  Unstart of a Hypersonic Inlet with Side Compression Caused by Downstream Choking , 2016 .

[28]  Koji Izumi,et al.  Experimental and computational studies focusing processes of shock waves reflected from parabolic reflectors , 1994 .

[29]  Simulation of transient flow in a shock tunnel and a high Mach number nozzle , 1991 .

[30]  Scott D. Holland Wind-tunnel blockage and actuation systems test of a two-dimensional scramjet inlet unstart model at Mach 6 , 1994 .

[31]  Nickolay Smirnov,et al.  Hydrogen fuel rocket engines simulation using LOGOS code , 2014 .

[32]  D. Wie,et al.  Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets , 1996 .

[33]  Xavier Veillard,et al.  Limiting Contractions for Starting Simple Ramp-Type Scramjet Intakes with Overboard Spillage , 2008 .