The Shape of the Vocabulary Predicts the Shape of the Bias

Children acquire attentional biases that help them generalize novel words to novel objects. Researchers have proposed that these biases arise from regularities in the early noun vocabulary children learn and suggest that the specifics of the biases should be tied to the specifics of individual children’s vocabularies. However, evidence supporting this proposal to date comes from studies of group means. The current study examines the relations between the statistics of the nouns young children learn and the similarities and differences in the biases they demonstrate. We show that individual differences in vocabulary structure predict individual differences in novel noun generalization. Thus, these data support the proposal that word learning biases emerge from the regularities present in individual children’s vocabularies and, importantly, that children’s on-line attention during an experiment is mediated by instances of past learning.

[1]  S. Prasada,et al.  Conceiving of entities as objects and as stuff , 2002, Cognition.

[2]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[3]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.

[4]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shifting ontological boundaries: how Japanese‐ and English‐speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts , 2003 .

[5]  Susan S. Jones,et al.  Late talkers show no shape bias in a novel name extension task , 2003 .

[6]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Human simulations of vocabulary learning , 1999, Cognition.

[7]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[9]  J. Morgan,et al.  Mommy and Me , 2005, Psychological science.

[10]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Do children with autism spectrum disorders show a shape bias in word learning? , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[11]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Object name learning and object perception: a deficit in late talkers , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[12]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Children's attention to rigid and deformable shape in naming and non-naming tasks. , 2000, Child development.

[13]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Early noun lexicons in English and Japanese , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Eliana Colunga,et al.  Making an ontology: Cross-linguistic evidence. , 2003 .

[15]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Learn Locally, Think Globally , 2010, Psychological science.

[16]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[17]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[18]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Shape and the first hundred nouns. , 2004, Child development.

[19]  E. Thelen,et al.  The transition to reaching: mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. , 1993, Child development.

[20]  A. Fernald,et al.  Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers' speech to infants. , 1993, Child development.

[21]  E. Markman Constraints on word learning: Speculations about their nature, origins, and domain specificity. , 1992 .

[22]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[23]  E. Markman Categorization and naming in children , 1989 .

[24]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Not your mother's view: the dynamics of toddler visual experience. , 2011, Developmental science.

[25]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[26]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Statistical regularities in vocabulary guide language acquisition in connectionist models and 15-20-month-olds. , 2002, Developmental psychology.