Facing policy challenges with inter- and transdisciplinary soil research focused on the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract. Our current information society, populated by increasingly well-informed and critical stakeholders, presents a challenge to both the policy and science arenas. The introduction of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offers a unique and welcome opportunity to direct joint activities towards these goals. Soil science, even though it is not mentioned as such, plays an important role in realizing a number of SDGs focusing on food, water, climate, health, biodiversity, and sustainable land use. A plea is made for a systems approach to land use studies, to be initiated by soil scientists, in which these land-related SDGs are considered in an integrated manner. To connect with policy makers and stakeholders, two approaches are functional. The first of these is the policy cycle when planning and executing research, which includes signaling, design, decision making, implementation, and evaluation. Many current research projects spend little time on signaling, which may lead to disengagement of stakeholders. Also, implementation is often seen as the responsibility of others, while it is crucial to demonstrate – if successful – the relevance of soil science. The second approach is the DPSIR approach when following the policy cycle in land-related research, distinguishing external drivers, pressures, impact, and responses to land use change that affect the state of the land in the past, present, and future. Soil science cannot by itself realize SDGs, and interdisciplinary studies on ecosystem services (ESs) provide an appropriate channel to define contributions of soil science in terms of the seven soil functions. ESs, in turn, can contribute to addressing the six SDGs (2, 3, 6, 12, 13, and 15) with an environmental, land-related character. SDGs have a societal focus and future soil science research can only be successful if stakeholders are part of the research effort in transdisciplinary projects, based on the principle of time-consuming "joint learning". The internal organization of the soil science discipline is not yet well tuned to the needs of inter- and transdisciplinary approaches.

[1]  M. Lebowitz,et al.  Landscape-epidemiological study design to investigate an environmentally based disease , 2011, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[2]  R. D. Groot,et al.  A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services , 2002 .

[3]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Implications of the Knowledge Paradox for Soil Science , 2010 .

[4]  Luca Montanarella,et al.  Agricultural policy: Govern our soils , 2015, Nature.

[5]  Murray Patterson,et al.  A soil change-based methodology for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services from agro-ecosystems: A case study of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand , 2014 .

[6]  A. McBratney,et al.  Securing our soil , 2015 .

[7]  R. J. in 't Veld Knowledge democracy : consequences for science, politics, and media , 2010 .

[8]  L. Montanarella,et al.  Putting soils on the agenda: the three Rio Conventions and the post-2015 development agenda , 2015 .

[9]  J. Bouma,et al.  The role of soil series in quantitative land evaluation when expressing effects of climate change and crop breeding on future land use , 2015 .

[10]  Johan Bouma,et al.  The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals , 2016 .

[11]  J. Bouma,et al.  Environmental impacts of innovative dairy farming systems aiming at improved internal nutrient cycling: A multi-scale assessment. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[13]  R. Rabbinge,et al.  Ecoregional research for development , 2007 .

[14]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Facing policy challenges with inter- and transdisciplinary soil research focused on the SDG's , 2016 .

[15]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Land Evaluation for Landscape Units , 2018, Handbook of Soil Sciences (Two Volume Set).

[16]  R. Scholz,et al.  Transdisciplinarity : joint problem solving among science, technology, and society : an effective way for managing complexity , 2001 .

[17]  J. Bouma The importance of validated ecological indicators for manure regulations in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[18]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Green Water Credits – exploring its potential to enhance ecosystem services by reducing soil erosion in the Upper Tana basin, Kenya , 2014 .

[19]  H. Mollenhorst,et al.  Benchmarking the economic, environmental and societal performance of Dutch dairy farms aiming at internal recycling of nutrients , 2014 .

[20]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Chapter Six – The Role of Knowledge When Studying Innovation and the Associated Wicked Sustainability Problems in Agriculture , 2011 .

[21]  Panos Panagos,et al.  A new baseline of organic carbon stock in European agricultural soils using a modelling approach , 2014, Global change biology.

[22]  Martin Hilbert,et al.  The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information , 2011, Science.

[23]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[24]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Engaging Soil Science in Transdisciplinary Research Facing “Wicked” Problems in the Information Society , 2015 .

[25]  J. Stoorvogel,et al.  Soil science input in transdisciplinary projects in the Netherlands and Italy , 2015 .

[26]  J. Bouma Applying indicators, threshold values and proxies in environmental legislation: A case study for Dutch dairy farming , 2011 .

[27]  Johan Bouma,et al.  Simulation modelling for water governance in basins , 2014 .

[28]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  The role of scientists in multiscale land use analysis: lessons learned from Dutch communities of practice , 2008 .