A Goal-Oriented Framework for Analyzing and Modeling City Dashboards in Smart Cities

For several years, many cities around the world are moving through a number of initiatives to implement the so-called “city dashboards”, as an opportunity for a new quality of urban life in terms of knowing and governing cities. The main contribution of this paper is to examine how city dashboards are performing on various metrics and comparing them in order to understand what they do. Starting from this perspective, to the best of our knowledge and by examining dashboard examples, there are many differences in the products that go by the name “city dashboards”. Moreover there are several methodological and technical issues that are not dealt with and yet solved in terms of data, indicators and benchmarking. The design of a city dashboard needs a clear vision of the direction that public administrations intend to undertake, alongside an ability to build scenarios and analyze the results of experiments in the context of the changing urban variables. Given the gap in academic literature concerning this subject, we developed a goal-oriented framework for examining the characteristics of various city dashboards and developing a taxonomy. Our framework enables a more systematic process for developing an effective city dashboard and provides useful insights to decision makers. The results suggest that some features emerge and our findings highlight specific clusters.

[1]  H. D. Rombach,et al.  The Goal Question Metric Approach , 1994 .

[2]  Michele Marchesi,et al.  Empirical Analysis on the Satisfaction of IT Employees Comparing XP Practices with Other Software Development Methodologies , 2004, XP.

[3]  Mohsen Kahani,et al.  A Metrics-Driven Approach for Quality Assessment of Linked Open Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[4]  Ljupco Kocarev,et al.  ISO-Standardized Smart City Platform Architecture and Dashboard , 2017, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[5]  Lily Bui Breathing smarter: A critical look at representations of air quality sensing data across platforms and publics , 2015, 2015 IEEE First International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[6]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  GQM+Strategies: A Comprehensive Methodology for Aligning Business Strategies with Software Measurement , 2014, ArXiv.

[7]  Aapo Huovila,et al.  What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities , 2017 .

[8]  Suhardi,et al.  Smart city dashboard for integrating various data of sensor networks , 2013, International Conference on ICT for Smart Society.

[9]  Tracey P. Lauriault,et al.  Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards , 2015 .

[10]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[11]  Pierfrancesco Bellini,et al.  Km4City Smart City API: An Integrated Support for Mobility Services , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP).

[12]  Everton Cavalcante,et al.  Improving public safety at fingertips: A smart city experience , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2).

[13]  Luca Cagliero,et al.  Monitoring the citizens' perception on urban security in Smart City environments , 2015, 2015 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops.

[14]  Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese,et al.  Tìpalo: A Tool for Automatic Typing of DBpedia Entities , 2013, ESWC.

[15]  Husni Teja Sukmana,et al.  Models and software measurement using Goal/Question/Metric method and CMS Matrix parameter (Case study discussion forum) , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM).

[16]  Renata Paola Dameri,et al.  Smart City Implementation , 2017 .

[17]  M. Angelidou Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces , 2015 .

[18]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance , 2016 .

[19]  C. Pop,et al.  My City Dashboard: Real-time Data Processing Platform for Smart Cities , 2017 .

[20]  Tsu-Ming Yeh,et al.  Factors in determining wind farm location: Integrating GQM, fuzzy DEMATEL, and ANP , 2014 .

[21]  E. Pautasso,et al.  Toward a Methodological Approach to Assess Public Value in Smart Cities , 2016 .

[22]  Kai Lin,et al.  Interdisciplinary Decision Support Dashboard: A New Framework for a Tanzanian Agricultural and Ecosystem Service Monitoring System Pilot , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Giulio Concas,et al.  The Web Knowledge Management: A Taxonomy-Based Approach , 2013, IC3K.