Low-dose vs standard-dose unfractionated heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes treated with fondaparinux: the FUTURA/OASIS-8 randomized trial.

CONTEXT The optimal unfractionated heparin regimen for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with fondaparinux is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To compare the safety of 2 unfractionated heparin regimens during PCI in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes initially treated with fondaparinux. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Double-blind randomized parallel-group trial in 179 hospitals in 18 countries involving 2026 patients undergoing PCI within 72 hours, nested within a cohort of 3235 high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes initially treated with fondaparinux enrolled from February 2009 to March 2010. INTERVENTIONS Patients received intravenously either low-dose unfractionated heparin, 50 U/kg, regardless of use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GpIIb-IIIa) inhibitors or standard-dose unfractionated heparin, 85 U/kg (60 U/kg with GpIIb-IIIa inhibitors), adjusted by blinded activated clotting time (ACT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Composite of major bleeding, minor bleeding, or major vascular access-site complications up to 48 hours after PCI. Key secondary outcomes include composite of major bleeding at 48 hours with death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization within day 30. RESULTS The primary outcome occurred in 4.7% of those in the low-dose group vs 5.8% in the standard-dose group (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.19; P = .27). The rates of major bleeding were not different but the rates of minor bleeding were lower with 0.7% in the low-dose group vs 1.7% in the standard-dose group (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.97; P = .04). For the key secondary outcome, the rates for low-dose group were 5.8% vs 3.9% in the standard-dose group (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.00-2.28; P = .05) and for death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization it was 4.5% for the low-dose group vs 2.9% for the standard-dose group (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.98-2.53; P = .06). Catheter thrombus rates were very low (0.5% in the low-dose group and 0.1% in the standard-dose group, P = .15). CONCLUSION Low-dose compared with standard-dose unfractionated heparin did not reduce major peri-PCI bleeding and vascular access-site complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00790907.

[1]  S. Rinfret,et al.  Impact of final activated clotting time after transradial coronary stenting with maximal antiplatelet therapy. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction (HORIZONS-AMI): 1-year results of a randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[3]  W. Nammas,et al.  The CIAO (Coronary Interventions Antiplatelet-based Only) Study: a randomized study comparing standard anticoagulation regimen to absence of anticoagulation for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing PCI. Results of the RIVIERA study. , 2008, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Steinhubl,et al.  Impact of anticoagulation levels on outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the STEEPLE trial. , 2008, European heart journal.

[6]  William Wijns,et al.  [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes]. , 2007, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[7]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the OASIS-5 trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patie , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials: A Case for Standardized Definitions , 2007, Circulation.

[10]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  [Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions]. , 2005, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[15]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[16]  S. Steinhubl,et al.  Relationship Between Activated Clotting Time and Ischemic or Hemorrhagic Complications: Analysis of 4 Recent Randomized Clinical Trials of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004, Circulation.

[17]  G. Levine,et al.  Relationship between heparin anticoagulation and clinical outcomes in coronary stent intervention: observations from the ESPRIT trial. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Epilog Investigators,et al.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  H. Benamer,et al.  A randomized trial of a fixed high dose vs a weight-adjusted low dose of intravenous heparin during coronary angioplasty. , 1997, European heart journal.

[20]  R. Califf,et al.  Standard versus low-dose weight-adjusted heparin in patients treated with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody fragment abciximab (c7E3 Fab) during percutaneous coronary revascularization. PROLOG Investigators. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[21]  B. Meier,et al.  Low-dose heparin for routine coronary angioplasty and stenting. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.