The role of linguistic experience in the processing of probabilistic information in production

ABSTRACT Speakers track the probability that a word will occur in a particular context and utilise this information during phonetic processing. For example, content words that have high probability within a discourse tend to be realised with reduced acoustic/articulatory properties. Such probabilistic information may influence L1 and L2 speech processing in distinct ways (reflecting differences in linguistic experience across groups and the overall difficulty of L2 speech processing). To examine this issue, L1 and L2 speakers performed a referential communication task, describing sequences of simple actions. The two groups of speakers showed similar effects of discourse-dependent probabilistic information on production, suggesting that L2 speakers can successfully track discourse-dependent probabilities and use such information to modulate phonetic processing.

[1]  R. Schreuder,et al.  Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[2]  P. Lieberman.  Some Effects of Semantic and Grammatical Context on the Production and Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[3]  Holger Mitterer,et al.  How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: the frequency-lag hypothesis. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  Adilson E. Motter,et al.  Beyond Word Frequency: Bursts, Lulls, and Scaling in the Temporal Distributions of Words , 2009, PloS one.

[6]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The cognate facilitation effect: implications for models of lexical access. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Knowledge of Grammar, Knowledge of Usage: Syntactic Probabilities Affect Pronunciation Variation , 2004 .

[8]  Matthew Goldrick,et al.  Phonetic processing of non-native speech in semantic vs non-semantic tasks. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[10]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[11]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  A processing-centered look at the contribution of givenness to durational reduction , 2012 .

[12]  S. Gahl.  Time and Thyme Are not Homophones: The Effect of Lemma Frequency on Word Durations in Spontaneous Speech , 2008 .

[13]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  The selection of closed-class elements during language production: a reassessment of the evidence and a new look on new data , 2014 .

[15]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[16]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language comprehension , 2002 .

[17]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  The word frequency effect in first- and second-language word recognition: A lexical entrenchment account , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors , 1990 .

[19]  Albert Costa,et al.  A disadvantage in bilingual sentence production modulated by syntactic frequency and similarity across languages , 2013, Cognition.

[20]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  A Synthesis of Some Recent Work in Sentence Production , 1989 .

[21]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Old and Thee, uh, New , 2004, Psychological science.

[22]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Synthesising meaning and processing approaches to prosody: performance matters , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[23]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[24]  C. Fowler,et al.  Talkers' signaling of new and old. words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction , 1987 .

[25]  F. Ferreira,et al.  How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums , 2002 .

[26]  Dan Jurafsky,et al.  Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G. Yeni-Komshian,et al.  Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language , 2000 .

[28]  E. Bard,et al.  Controlling the Intelligibility of Referring Expressions in Dialogue , 2000 .

[29]  M. Ernestus,et al.  Variability in the pronunciation of non-native English the: Effects of frequency and disfluencies , 2014 .

[30]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[31]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Which words are activated during bilingual word production? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[33]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Selection of freestanding and bound gender-marking morphemes in speech production: a review , 2014 .

[34]  J. Morgan,et al.  SIGNAL TO SYNTAX : Bootstrapping From Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition , 2008 .

[35]  A. Fernald,et al.  Real-time processing of gender-marked articles by native and non-native Spanish speakers. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.

[36]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Reduction in prosodic prominence predicts speakers' recall: implications for theories of prosody , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[37]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  What data from the simple-picture naming task tell us about lexical competition—A rejoinder to Janssen, Schiller, and Alario , 2014 .

[38]  Roger Levy,et al.  Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction , 2006, NIPS.

[39]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: speaker experience vs. common ground , 2015 .

[40]  Susan G. Guion,et al.  Prosody in second language acquisition: Acoustic analyses of duration and F0 range , 2007 .

[41]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[42]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases , 2008, Cognition.

[43]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effects of addressee attention on prosodic prominence , 2015 .

[44]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[46]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Repetition reduction: lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Jarrod Had.  MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .

[48]  N. Snider,et al.  More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases , 2010 .

[49]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  C. Fowler,et al.  Embedded articulation: shifts in location influence speech production , 2014 .

[51]  B. Munson,et al.  The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[52]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Variability in Word Duration as a Function of Probability, Speech Style, and Prosody , 2009, Language and speech.

[53]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations , 1998 .

[54]  Tracey M. Derwing,et al.  Foreign Accent, Comprehensibility, and Intelligibility in the Speech of Second Language Learners , 1995 .

[55]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[56]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[57]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[58]  Antje S Meyer,et al.  Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[59]  Scott Seyfarth,et al.  Word informativity influences acoustic duration: Effects of contextual predictability on lexical representation , 2014, Cognition.

[60]  F. Alario,et al.  Phonologically driven variability: the case of determiners. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Melissa Baese-Berk,et al.  Word durations in non-native English , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[62]  P. Boersma.  Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 4.4.24) , 2006 .

[63]  F.-Xavier Alario,et al.  A cross-linguistic investigation of determiner production , 2001 .

[64]  T. Sandoval,et al.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[65]  Kristin Lemhöfer,et al.  Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[66]  C. Fowler.  Differential Shortening of Repeated Content Words Produced in Various Communicative Contexts , 1988, Language and speech.

[67]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[68]  Michele Miozzo,et al.  Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Yvonne Koch.  The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation , 2016 .

[70]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels , 2010 .

[71]  William D. Raymond,et al.  Probabilistic Relations between Words: Evidence from Reduction in Lexical Production , 2008 .

[72]  V. Marian,et al.  Repetition reduction during word and concept overlap in bilinguals. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[73]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[74]  M. Brodeur,et al.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a New Set of 480 Normative Photos of Objects to Be Used as Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Research , 2010, PloS one.

[75]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[76]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Prosodic Structure of Function Words , 2008 .

[77]  Albert Costa,et al.  More than words: multiword frequency effects in non-native speakers , 2016 .

[78]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. , 2015, Journal of memory and language.

[79]  A. Colomé,et al.  Lexical Activation in Bilinguals' Speech Production: Language-Specific or Language-Independent? , 2001 .

[80]  Sharon Goldwater,et al.  Talkers account for listener and channel characteristics to communicate efficiently , 2015 .

[81]  Albert Costa,et al.  Characterizing the Bilingual Disadvantage in Noun Phrase Production , 2012, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[82]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: a cross-linguistic perspective , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[83]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Articulatory Planning Is Continuous and Sensitive to Informational Redundancy , 2005, Phonetica.

[84]  Christine Fennema-Notestine,et al.  Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification , 2005, Memory & cognition.