Promoting collaborative problem-solving skills in a course on engineering grand challenges

The ability to solve problems with people of diverse backgrounds is essential for engineering graduates. A course on engineering grand challenges was designed to promote collaborative problem-solving (CPS) skills. One unique component is that students need to work both within their own team and collaborate with the other team to tackle engineering challenges. It is found that the course facilitates the development in CPS skills and that the process, in which two teams develop arguments and integrate the initial ideas to generate a final solution, is a critical component. The value of CPS skills in tackling engineering problems has also been demonstrated. Appropriate scaffolding, explicit training and constant feedback on collaborative processes are found as important for the skill development.

[1]  Lydia Kavanagh,et al.  Triple-objective Team Mentoring: Achieving Learning Objectives with Chemical Engineering Students , 2007 .

[2]  S. Shah.  The use of group activities in developing personal transferable skills , 2013 .

[3]  Marcel D'Eon,et al.  An Innovative Modification to Structured Controversy , 2001 .

[4]  W. Damon,et al.  Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education , 1989 .

[5]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Constructive Controversy: The Educative Power of Intellectual Conflict , 2000 .

[6]  Tracy X. P. Zou,et al.  Teamwork development across the curriculum for chemical engineering students in Hong Kong: Processes, outcomes and lessons learned , 2012 .

[7]  Sushil H. Bhavnani,et al.  Teamwork across Disciplinary Borders: A Bridge between College and the Work Place , 2000 .

[8]  Alan Smith.  Diversified structures and a structure for diversity: some recent trends and developments in engineering education cooperation in the European Community , 1981 .

[9]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[10]  Elisabeth Dunne,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Industry and Higher Education: Training Academics to Promote Student Teamwork , 2000 .

[11]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in Society , 2005 .

[12]  Patrick Lai,et al.  Problem design in problem-based learning: evaluating students' learning and self-directed learning practice , 2003 .

[13]  Randall S. Hansen,et al.  Benefits and Problems With Student Teams: Suggestions for Improving Team Projects , 2006 .

[14]  D. Garvin,et al.  What you don't know about making decisions , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[15]  Vreda Pieterse,et al.  Academic alignment to reduce the presence of ‘social loafers’ and ‘diligent isolates’ in student teams , 2010 .

[16]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators , 2006 .

[17]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Shared rewards and goal interdependence for psychological safety among departments in China , 2012 .

[18]  Karen L. Tonso,et al.  Teams that Work: Campus Culture, Engineer Identity, and Social Interactions , 2006 .

[19]  Kevin Downing,et al.  Impact of problem‐based learning on student experience and metacognitive development , 2011 .

[20]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  STRUCTURING LEARNING GOALS TO MEET THE GOALS OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION. , 1981 .

[21]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[22]  Comparing two cooperative small group formats used with physical therapy and medical students , 2007 .

[23]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Constructive controversy for learning and team effectiveness in China , 2011 .