Accuracy Considerations in the Analysis of Depressions in Medium-Resolution Lidar DEMs

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of vertical accuracy of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) on the occurrence of topographic depressions. Stochastic depression modeling of a medium-resolution lidar DEM for a low-relief study area was carried out using Monte Carlo simulation of a range of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values for vertical error. Depth and size of observed depressions were compared to the stochastic modeling results in order to separate artificial from real depressions. Small and shallow depressions were more likely to be artificial than large and deep depressions, but the use of single threshold values for surface area, mean depth, or maximum depth to distinguish artificial from real depressions results in many incorrect classifications, and further empirical field validation is required. Stochastic error modeling of DEMs was effective in determining the reliability of a complex unconstrained terrain derivative such as the occurrence of topographic depressions. However, stochastic approaches do not properly account for large systematic errors common in lidar DEMs. As lidar data become more widely used and the accuracy expectations for terrain derivatives increase as a result, a more rigorous characterization and/or removal of these systematic errors will become necessary.

[1]  J. Hudson A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[2]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  J. Dozier,et al.  Automated basin delineation from digital elevation data , 1984 .

[4]  David M. Mark,et al.  Part 4: Mathematical, Algorithmic and Data Structure Issues: Automated Detection Of Drainage Networks From Digital Elevation Models , 1984 .

[5]  M. Goodchild,et al.  The Fractal Nature of Geographic Phenomena , 1987 .

[6]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[7]  L. Martz,et al.  CATCH: a FORTRAN program for measuring catchment area from digital elevation models , 1988 .

[8]  M. Hutchinson A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[9]  P. Fisher,et al.  Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models , 1992 .

[10]  Andrea Tribe,et al.  Automated recognition of valley lines and drainage networks from grid digital elevation models: a review and a new method , 1992 .

[11]  Mark P. Kumler An Intensive Comparison of Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINs) and Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) , 1994 .

[12]  H. Veregin The Effects of Vertical Error in Digital Elevation Models on the Determination of Flow-path Direction , 1997 .

[13]  Gabriele Bitelli,et al.  Comparison of Techniques for Generating Digital Terrain Models from Contour Lines , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  L. Martz,et al.  The treatment of flat areas and depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models , 1998 .

[15]  Z. Yin,et al.  A comparison of drainage networks derived from digital elevation models at two scales , 1998 .

[16]  Charles Robert Ehlschlaeger The stochastic simulation approach : tools for representing spatial application uncertainty , 1998 .

[17]  L. Martz,et al.  An outlet breaching algorithm for the treatment of closed depressions in a raster DEM , 1999 .

[18]  D. Scott Mackay,et al.  A general model of watershed extraction and representation using globally optimal flow paths and up-slope contributing areas , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[19]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[20]  P. Kyriakidis,et al.  Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling , 2000 .

[21]  K. Holmesa,et al.  Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling , 2000 .

[22]  Frédéric Darboux,et al.  A fast, simple and versatile algorithm to fill the depressions of digital elevation models , 2002 .

[23]  Kevin J. McMaster Effects of digital elevation model resolution on derived stream network positions , 2002 .

[24]  Igor V. Florinsky,et al.  Errors of signal processing in digital terrain modelling , 2002, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  R. MacMillan,et al.  Automated analysis and classification of landforms using high-resolution digital elevation data: applications and issues , 2003 .

[26]  K. Burnett,et al.  Comparison of Digital Elevation Models for Aquatic Data Development , 2003 .

[27]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[28]  T. Sarjakoski,et al.  Error propagation analysis of DEM‐based drainage basin delineation , 2005 .

[29]  G. Hancock The use of digital elevation models in the identification and characterization of catchments over different grid scales , 2005 .

[30]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Sensitivity of digital landscapes to artifact depressions in remotely-sensed DEMs , 2005 .

[31]  J. Lindsay,et al.  Removal of artifact depressions from digital elevation models: towards a minimum impact approach , 2005 .

[32]  Irena F. Creed,et al.  Distinguishing actual and artefact depressions in digital elevation data , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[33]  John B. Lindsay,et al.  Sensitivity of channel mapping techniques to uncertainty in digital elevation data , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[34]  Le Wang,et al.  A multi-resolution approach for filtering LiDAR altimetry data , 2006 .

[35]  P. Zandbergen The effect of cell resolution on depressions in Digital Elevation Models , 2006 .

[36]  L. Wang,et al.  An efficient method for identifying and filling surface depressions in digital elevation models for hydrologic analysis and modelling , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[37]  S. Wechsler,et al.  Quantifying DEM Uncertainty and its Effect on Topographic Parameters , 2006 .

[38]  Tapani Sarjakoski,et al.  Uncovering the statistical and spatial characteristics of fine toposcale DEM error , 2006, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[39]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from Aerial Laser Scanner Data in forested terrain☆ , 2007 .

[40]  Frank Kenny,et al.  Routing overland flow through sinks and flats in interpolated raster terrain surfaces , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[41]  G. Hancock The impact of depression removal on catchment geomorphology, soil erosion and landscape evolution , 2008 .

[42]  J. Lindsay,et al.  The influence of elevation error on the morphometrics of channel networks extracted from DEMs and the implications for hydrological modelling , 2008 .

[43]  José Luis Lerma,et al.  Unsupervised robust planar segmentation of terrestrial laser scanner point clouds based on fuzzy clustering methods , 2008 .

[44]  Y. Martin,et al.  Centimetre-scale digital representations of terrain and impacts on depression storage and runoff , 2008 .

[45]  Paul A. Zandbergen,et al.  Positional Accuracy of Spatial Data: Non‐Normal Distributions and a Critique of the National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[46]  Le Wang,et al.  Isprs Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing a Multi-directional Ground Filtering Algorithm for Airborne Lidar , 2022 .

[47]  P. Cui,et al.  A new treatment of depression for drainage network extraction based on DEM , 2009 .

[48]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Modeling the Uncertainty of Slope and Aspect Estimates Derived from Spatial Databases , 2010 .

[49]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Simulating Two-dimensional Autocorrelated Surfaces , 2010 .

[50]  P. Zandbergen Characterizing the error distribution of lidar elevation data for North Carolina , 2011 .