Exploring the Futures of Mobiles for Social Development Using Ethnographic Futures Research

As new technologies such as mobile phones impact peoples’ daily lives, interest into their potential is also growing. In this research paper we aim to identify and explore how a particular research approach, in this instance, ethnographic futures research (EFR), can be utilized for future predictions of mobiles phones in social development activities in developing countries. The paper describes the process and offers reasoning for utilizing this approach. By undertaking this research, the benefits are that academics will learn of an approach that will allow the study of and understanding social development activities achieved by novel mobile applications. For practitioners, such research offers the potential of obtaining a rich, simple and clearer understanding of mobile application development. By obtaining such an understanding, regions around the globe can be targeted and diffusion strategies leading to increasing mobile phone users will occur. By applying EFR it is concluded that there is definitely a need for a different way of thinking about how mobile phone services should be created and deployed to marginalized communities to avoid the unsustainable models used for the initial tele ‐center deployments over a decade ago.

[1]  Robert B. Textor,et al.  Anticipatory Anthropology and the Telemicroelectronic Revolution: A Preliminary Report From Silicon Valley , 1985 .

[2]  Melissa Lowdon Ethnographic Futures Research , 2010 .

[3]  P. Järvinen Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[4]  Paula Kotzé,et al.  Cultural Factors in a Mobile Phone Adoption and Usage Model , 2008, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[5]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[6]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[9]  Bo Dahlbom,et al.  The New Informatics , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Wendell Bell Foundations of Futures Studies , 1996 .

[11]  Rodney L. Stump,et al.  Exploring the Digital Divide in Mobile-phone Adoption Levels across Countries , 2008 .

[12]  Matthew M. Mitchell,et al.  Exploring the Future of the Digital Divide through Ethnographic Futures Research , 2002, First Monday.

[13]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[14]  Shintaro Okazaki,et al.  Mobile advertising adoption by multinationals: Senior executives' initial responses , 2005, Internet Res..

[15]  Jonathan Donner,et al.  Research Approaches to Mobile Use in the Developing World : A Review of the Literature , 2007 .

[16]  R. Gephart Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[17]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Barry Turner,et al.  Some practical aspects of qualitative data analysis: One way of organising the cognitive processes associated with the generation of grounded theory , 1981 .

[19]  Robert B. Textor,et al.  Cultural futures for thailand: An ethnographic enquiry , 1978 .

[20]  Harry F. Wolcott Ethnography: A Way of Seeing , 1999 .

[21]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[24]  N. Carr IT doesn't matter , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[25]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[26]  Robert B. Textor,et al.  Austria 2005: Projected sociocultural effects of the microelectronic revolution , 1983 .

[27]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[28]  Ned Kock,et al.  Action research: lessons learned from a multi-iteration study of computer-mediated communication in groups , 2003 .

[29]  Sippanondha Ketudat,et al.  The Middle path for the future of Thailand : technology in harmony with culture and environment , 1990 .

[30]  Robert B. Textor,et al.  The ethnographic futures research method: An application to Thailand , 1995 .

[31]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[32]  P. Oquist,et al.  The Epistemology of Action Research , 1978 .