Native multi-trait rhizobacteria promote growth and suppress foot rot in black pepper

In this study, 74 PGPR isolates from different varieties of black pepper were characterized for morphological, biochemical and nutrient mobilization traits as well as inhibition of Phytophthora capsici (causing foot rot) under in vitro conditions. Based on the multiple traits, two PGPR [(Micrococcus luteus Schroeter (1872) Cohn 1872 (BRB3) and Enterobacter aerogenes Hormaeche and Edwards 1960 (AL) (BRB13)] were shortlisted for further growth promotion studies. For biocontrol studies, three PGPR [(Burkholderia cepacia (Palleroni & Holmes 1981) Yabuuchi et al. (1993) (BRB21), Pseudomonas aeruginosa Schroter (1872) Migula 1900 (BRB28) and Serratia marcescens Bizio 1823 (AL) (BRB49)] which showed >70% inhibition of P. capsici were shortlisted. The results from green house study on growth promotion indicated that application of M. luteus (BRB3) + 75% recommended dose (RD) of N + 100% RD of PK produced taller plants, longer roots, greater fresh biomass, more number of leaves and nodes in black pepper. This suggested a 25% reduction in chemical N fertilizer in the presence of M. luteus (BRB3). In the green house study on biocontrol, lowest foot rot (32.77%) and taller plants (332.0 cm) were observed with B. cepacia (BRB 21), which was on par with chemical treatment. This is the first report on the potential of PGPR like M. luteus for growth promotion and B. cepacia for management of P. capsici in black pepper.

[1]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and NPK Fertilizers on Biochemical and Microbial Properties of Soils Under Ginger (Zingiber officinale) Cultivation , 2013, Agricultural Research.

[2]  M. Faisal,et al.  Growth promotion of maize by desiccation tolerant Micrococcus luteus-chp37 isolated from Cholistan desert, Pakistan. , 2013 .

[3]  K. Wydra,et al.  Characterization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their potential as bioprotectant against tomato bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum , 2013 .

[4]  J. Vangronsveld,et al.  The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils , 2013, Soil biology & biochemistry.

[5]  B. Tümmler,et al.  Friend or foe: genetic and functional characterization of plant endophytic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2013, Environmental microbiology.

[6]  E. Schmidt,et al.  Burkholdines from Burkholderia ambifaria: antifungal agents and possible virulence factors. , 2012, Journal of natural products.

[7]  Ashok Pandey,et al.  Isolation and characterization of novel plant growth promoting Micrococcus sp NII-0909 and its interaction with cowpea. , 2010, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[8]  David E. Crowley,et al.  MECHANISMS AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS INVOLVED IN PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION BY RHIZOBACTERIA , 2010 .

[9]  B. Lugtenberg,et al.  Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. , 2009, Annual review of microbiology.

[10]  J. Pernthaler,et al.  Production of the antifungal compound pyrrolnitrin is quorum sensing-regulated in members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. , 2009, Environmental microbiology.

[11]  J. Kloepper,et al.  Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Allow Reduced Application Rates of Chemical Fertilizers , 2009, Microbial Ecology.

[12]  S. Eapen,et al.  Endophytic bacterial flora in root and stem tissues of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) genotype: isolation, identification and evaluation against Phytophthora capsici , 2009, Letters in applied microbiology.

[13]  M. Nuti,et al.  Single and co-inoculation of Bacillus subtilis and Azospirillum brasilense on Lycopersicon esculentum: Effects on plant growth and rhizosphere microbial community , 2008 .

[14]  J. González-López,et al.  A Review on the Taxonomy and Possible Screening Traits of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria , 2008 .

[15]  M. Arshad,et al.  Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonads for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  Y. Ohta,et al.  Isolation and characterization of a novel Burkholderia cepacia with strong antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Jishuang Chen,et al.  Two Phosphate- and Potassium-solubilizing Bacteria Isolated from Tianmu Mountain, Zhejiang, China , 2006 .

[18]  J. Nowak,et al.  Use of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria for Biocontrol of Plant Diseases: Principles, Mechanisms of Action, and Future Prospects , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[19]  S. R. Subramoniam,et al.  Assessing in vitro solubilization potential of different zinc solubilizing bacterial (zsb) isolates , 2004 .

[20]  R. Kremer,et al.  Determination of bacterially derived auxins using a microplate method , 1995 .

[21]  J. Kloepper,et al.  Analysis of populations and physiological characterization of microorganisms in rhizospheres of plants with antagonistic properties to phytopathogenic nematodes , 1991, Plant and Soil.

[22]  S. Massoud,et al.  Influence of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on tomato plant growth and nematode reproduction under greenhouse conditions. , 2013, Saudi journal of biological sciences.

[23]  C. Quan,et al.  Antifungal Compounds of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Its Action Mode , 2010 .

[24]  Y. Bashan,et al.  Chapter Two – How the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Azospirillum Promotes Plant Growth—A Critical Assessment , 2010 .

[25]  B. Tindall,et al.  Phenotypic Characterization and the Principles of Comparative Systematics , 2007 .

[26]  G. Berg,et al.  Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi. , 2005, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[27]  T. Hernández,et al.  Ability of different plant species to promote microbiological processes in semiarid soil , 2005 .