Knee cartilage extraction and bone-cartilage interface analysis from 3D MRI data sets

This works presents a robust methodology for the analysis of the knee joint cartilage and the knee bone-cartilage interface from fused MRI sets. The proposed approach starts by fusing a set of two 3D MR images the knee. Although the proposed method is not pulse sequence dependent, the first sequence should be programmed to achieve good contrast between bone and cartilage. The recommended second pulse sequence is one that maximizes the contrast between cartilage and surrounding soft tissues. Once both pulse sequences are fused, the proposed bone-cartilage analysis is done in four major steps. First, an unsupervised segmentation algorithm is used to extract the femur, the tibia, and the patella. Second, a knowledge based feature extraction algorithm is used to extract the femoral, tibia and patellar cartilages. Third, a trained user corrects cartilage miss-classifications done by the automated extracted cartilage. Finally, the final segmentation is the revisited using an unsupervised MAP voxel relaxation algorithm. This final segmentation has the property that includes the extracted bone tissue as well as all the cartilage tissue. This is an improvement over previous approaches where only the cartilage was segmented. Furthermore, this approach yields very reproducible segmentation results in a set of scan-rescan experiments. When these segmentations were coupled with a partial volume compensated surface extraction algorithm the volume, area, thickness measurements shows precisions around 2.6%

[1]  Chris A McGibbon,et al.  Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of subchondral bone and cartilage thickness measurement from MRI. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[2]  C. McGibbon,et al.  Accuracy of cartilage and subchondral bone spatial thickness distribution from MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Kathryn Stevens,et al.  Imaging of the articular cartilage in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: 3D spatial‐spectral spoiled gradient‐echo vs. fat‐suppressed 3D spoiled gradient–echo MR imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Reliability of a quantification imaging system using magnetic resonance images to measure cartilage thickness and volume in human normal and osteoarthritic knees. , 2003, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  Amy L. Lerner,et al.  Evaluation of distance maps from fast GRE MRI as a tool to study the knee joint space , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  S Martelli,et al.  The shapes of the tibial and femoral articular surfaces in relation to tibiofemoral movement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  F Eckstein,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Claude Kauffmann,et al.  Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  K.J. Parker,et al.  The integration of automatic segmentation and motion tracking for 4D reconstruction and visualization of musculoskeletal structures , 1998, Proceedings. Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis (Cat. No.98EX162).

[12]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Femoro‐tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[14]  Nuggehally Sampath Jayant,et al.  An adaptive clustering algorithm for image segmentation , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[15]  Andreas Mohr,et al.  The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[16]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  C. McGibbon,et al.  Subchondral bone and cartilage thickness from MRI: effects of chemical-shift artifact , 2003, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[18]  R Burgkart,et al.  Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[19]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  Segmentation, surface extraction, and thickness computation of articular cartilage , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Kevin J. Parker,et al.  Unsupervised statistical segmentation of multispectral volumetric MRI images , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[21]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative image analysis: software systems in drug development trials. , 2003, Drug discovery today.