The mobility of two kinase domains in the Escherichia coli chemoreceptor array varies with signalling state

Motile bacteria sense their physical and chemical environment through highly cooperative, ordered arrays of chemoreceptors. These signalling complexes phosphorylate a response regulator which in turn governs flagellar motor reversals, driving cells towards favourable environments. The structural changes that translate chemoeffector binding into the appropriate kinase output are not known. Here, we apply high‐resolution electron cryotomography to visualize mutant chemoreceptor signalling arrays in well‐defined kinase activity states. The arrays were well ordered in all signalling states, with no discernible differences in receptor conformation at 2–3 nm resolution. Differences were observed, however, in a keel‐like density that we identify here as CheA kinase domains P1 and P2, the phosphorylation site domain and the binding domain for response regulator target proteins. Mutant receptor arrays with high kinase activities all exhibited small keels and high proteolysis susceptibility, indicative of mobile P1 and P2 domains. In contrast, arrays in kinase‐off signalling states exhibited a range of keel sizes. These findings confirm that chemoreceptor arrays do not undergo large structural changes during signalling, and suggest instead that kinase activity is modulated at least in part by changes in the mobility of key domains.

[1]  Christian Suloway,et al.  Fully automated, sequential tilt-series acquisition with Leginon. , 2009, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Mutational analyses of HAMP helices suggest a dynamic bundle model of input–output signalling in chemoreceptors , 2009, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  Chemical-shift-perturbation mapping of the phosphotransfer and catalytic domain interaction in the histidine autokinase CheA from Thermotoga maritima. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[4]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  CheA-receptor interaction sites in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Jun Liu,et al.  Molecular architecture of chemoreceptor arrays revealed by cryoelectron tomography of Escherichia coli minicells , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  C. V. Rao,et al.  Attractant Binding Induces Distinct Structural Changes to the Polar and Lateral Signaling Clusters in Bacillus subtilis Chemotaxis* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  R. Stewart,et al.  Protein histidine kinases: assembly of active sites and their regulation in signaling pathways. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[8]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Biphasic control logic of HAMP domain signalling in the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  Leonardo G. Trabuco,et al.  Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. , 2008, Structure.

[10]  Gabriela Gonzalez-Bonet,et al.  Reconstruction of the chemotaxis receptor–kinase assembly , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[12]  G. Jensen,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  John W Sedat,et al.  UCSF tomography: an integrated software suite for real-time electron microscopic tomographic data collection, alignment, and reconstruction. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[14]  R. Bourret,et al.  Intermolecular complementation of the kinase activity of CheA , 1993, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  M. Simon,et al.  Transmembrane signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis involves ligand-dependent activation of phosphate group transfer. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Falke,et al.  The core signaling proteins of bacterial chemotaxis assemble to form an ultrastable complex. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[17]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Crosslinking snapshots of bacterial chemoreceptor squads , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Weis,et al.  The receptor binding site for the methyltransferase of bacterial chemotaxis is distinct from the sites of methylation. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[19]  J R Kremer,et al.  Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  Davi R. Ortega,et al.  Universal architecture of bacterial chemoreceptor arrays , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Lateral density of receptor arrays in the membrane plane influences sensitivity of the E. coli chemotaxis response , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[22]  R. Stewart,et al.  CheZ Phosphatase Localizes to Chemoreceptor Patches via CheA-Short , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Liberation of an interaction domain from the phosphotransfer region of CheA, a signaling kinase of Escherichia coli. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  G. Jensen,et al.  An Improved Cryogen for Plunge Freezing , 2008, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[25]  M. Simon,et al.  Expression of CheA fragments which define domains encoding kinase, phosphotransfer, and CheY binding activities. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[26]  M. Homma Chemoreceptor signaling involves dimer-to-dimer interaction with its cluster at a cell pole , 2004 .

[27]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  METHODOLOGY ARTICLE Open Access , 2009 .

[28]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Symmetry-restrained flexible fitting for symmetric EM maps. , 2011, Structure.

[29]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Chemotactic signaling by the P1 phosphorylation domain liberated from the CheA histidine kinase of Escherichia coli , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[31]  J. Maddock,et al.  Clustering of the Chemoreceptor Complex inEscherichia coli Is Independent of the Methyltransferase CheR and the Methylesterase CheB , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[33]  Laura L Kiessling,et al.  Chemical probes of bacterial signal transduction reveal that repellents stabilize and attractants destabilize the chemoreceptor array. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[34]  Victor Sourjik,et al.  In vivo measurement by FRET of pathway activity in bacterial chemotaxis. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[35]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Cysteine-Scanning Analysis of the Chemoreceptor-Coupling Domain of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Signaling Kinase CheA , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[37]  J. Falke,et al.  Engineered socket study of signaling through a four-helix bundle: evidence for a yin-yang mechanism in the kinase control module of the aspartate receptor. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[38]  R. Stewart,et al.  The short form of the CheA protein restores kinase activity and chemotactic ability to kinase-deficient mutants. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  José-Jesús Fernández,et al.  Fast tomographic reconstruction on multicore computers , 2011, Bioinform..

[40]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor , 1999, Nature.

[41]  Sebastian Thiem,et al.  Protein exchange dynamics at chemoreceptor clusters in Escherichia coli , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  L. Kiessling,et al.  Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[43]  M. Simon,et al.  Structural and Chemical Requirements for Histidine Phosphorylation by the Chemotaxis Kinase CheA* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Chemoreceptor-Coupling Domain of the Escherichia coli Chemotaxis Signaling Kinase CheA , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  G. Murphy,et al.  Electron cryotomography sample preparation using the Vitrobot , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[47]  J. McIntosh,et al.  The Molecular Architecture of Axonemes Revealed by Cryoelectron Tomography , 2006, Science.

[48]  M. Homma,et al.  Attractant binding alters arrangement of chemoreceptor dimers within its cluster at a cell pole. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[50]  H. Berg,et al.  Effect of Chemoreceptor Modification on Assembly and Activity of the Receptor-Kinase Complex in Escherichia coli , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[51]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Different Signaling Roles of Two Conserved Residues in the Cytoplasmic Hairpin Tip of Tsr, the Escherichia coli Serine Chemoreceptor , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[52]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  R C Stewart,et al.  Rapid phosphotransfer to CheY from a CheA protein lacking the CheY-binding domain. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[54]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Chemotactic Signaling by an Escherichia coli CheA Mutant That Lacks the Binding Domain for Phosphoacceptor Partners , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[55]  Conformational suppression of inter-receptor signaling defects. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Mutational Analysis of the Connector Segment in the HAMP Domain of Tsr, the Escherichia coli Serine Chemoreceptor , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[57]  G. Jensen,et al.  Activated chemoreceptor arrays remain intact and hexagonally packed , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[58]  G. Jensen,et al.  Electron tomography of cells , 2011, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[59]  J. J. Fernández,et al.  CTF determination and correction in electron cryotomography. , 2006, Ultramicroscopy.