Time From Imaging to Endovascular Reperfusion Predicts Outcome in Acute Stroke

Background and Purpose— This study aims to describe the relationship between computed tomographic (CT) perfusion (CTP)-to-reperfusion time and clinical and radiological outcomes, in a cohort of patients who achieve successful reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke. Methods— We included data from the CRISP (Computed Tomographic Perfusion to Predict Response in Ischemic Stroke Project) in which all patients underwent a baseline CTP scan before endovascular therapy. Patients were included if they had a mismatch on their baseline CTP scan and achieved successful endovascular reperfusion. Patients with mismatch were categorized into target mismatch and malignant mismatch profiles, according to the volume of their Tmax >10s lesion volume (target mismatch, <100 mL; malignant mismatch, >100 mL). We investigated the impact of CTP-to-reperfusion times on probability of achieving functional independence (modified Rankin Scale, 0–2) at day 90 and radiographic outcomes at day 5. Results— Of 156 included patients, 108 (59%) had the target mismatch profile, and 48 (26%) had the malignant mismatch profile. In patients with the target mismatch profile, CTP-to-reperfusion time showed no association with functional independence (P=0.84), whereas in patients with malignant mismatch profile, CTP-to-reperfusion time was strongly associated with lower probability of functional independence (odds ratio, 0.08; P=0.003). Compared with patients with target mismatch, those with the malignant mismatch profile had significantly more infarct growth (90 [49–166] versus 43 [18–81] mL; P=0.006) and larger final infarct volumes (110 [61–155] versus 48 [21–99] mL; P=0.001). Conclusions— Compared with target mismatch patients, those with the malignant profile experience faster infarct growth and a steeper decline in the odds of functional independence, with longer delays between baseline imaging and reperfusion. However, this does not exclude the possibility of treatment benefit in patients with a malignant profile.

[1]  H. Diener,et al.  Efficacy of Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomographic Perfusion–Selected Patients in SWIFT PRIME Trial (Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke) , 2017, Stroke.

[2]  Matus Straka,et al.  Computed tomographic perfusion to Predict Response to Recanalization in ischemic stroke , 2017, Annals of neurology.

[3]  Nigel S. George,et al.  Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2016 .

[4]  Matus Straka,et al.  A benchmarking tool to evaluate computer tomography perfusion infarct core predictions against a DWI standard , 2016, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[6]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Analysis of Workflow and Time to Treatment on Thrombectomy Outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2016, Circulation.

[8]  Richard Frayne,et al.  Time-Dependent Computed Tomographic Perfusion Thresholds for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[9]  Manabu Inoue,et al.  Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue , 2015, Neurology.

[10]  Manabu Inoue,et al.  The Growth Rate of Early DWI Lesions is Highly Variable and Associated with Penumbral Salvage and Clinical Outcomes following Endovascular Reperfusion , 2013, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[11]  Michael D Hill,et al.  Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[12]  Geoffrey A. Donnan,et al.  Refining the Definition of the Malignant Profile: Insights From the DEFUSE-EPITHET Pooled Data Set , 2011, Stroke.