Uncertain network data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs to evaluate the efficiency of electricity power production and distribution processes

Both production and distribution process are evaluated in a unique uncertain network DEA model.Undesirable outputs and uncertainty of data are considered in proposed approach.Properties of proposed models are discussed through several theorems.The efficiencies of production and distribution phases are determined distinctively.A real case study of electrical power production and distribution network is surveyed. In this paper, a customized network data envelopment analysis model is developed to evaluate the efficiency of electric power production and distribution processes. In the production phase, power plants consume fuels such as oil and gas to generate the electricity. In the distribution phase, regional electricity companies transmit and distribute the electricity to the customers in houses, industries, and agriculture. Although, the electricity is assumed to be a clean type of energy, several types of emissions and pollutions are produced during electricity generation. The generated emissions are considered as an undesirable output. A customized network data envelopment analysis (NDEA) approach is proposed to evaluate the efficiency of these processes Each decision making unit (DMU) includes two serially connected sub-DMUs, i.e., production and distribution stages. The models are extended using interval data to address the considerable uncertainty in the problem. The efficiency scores of main process, and each sub-process are determined. The final ranking of DMUs and sub-DMUs are achieved using a multi-attribute decision making (MADM) method. The whole approach is applied in a real case study in electrical power production and distribution network with 14 DMUs. The proposed approach has the following innovations in comparison with existing methods: (1) Both production and distribution process are evaluated in a unique model; (2) Undesirable outputs and uncertainty of data are considered in proposed approach; (3) Properties of proposed models are discussed through several theorems; (4) The efficiencies of production and distribution phases are determined distinctively; (5) A full ranking approach is proposed; (6) A real case study of electrical power production and distribution network is surveyed. The results of proposed approach are adequate and interesting. This approach can be customized for application in similar systems such as water production-supply management, Oil and fuel production-distribution systems, and supply chains.

[1]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Network DEA: efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[4]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A new fuzzy network data envelopment analysis model for measuring the performance of agility in supply chains , 2013, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[5]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of information technology investment: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[6]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .

[7]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data , 2011, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Ying Luo,et al.  DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[9]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Mariana Iootty,et al.  The evolution and main determinants of productivity in Brazilian electricity distribution 1998-2005: an empirical analysis , 2009 .

[11]  K. Yoon A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions , 1987 .

[12]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Best-practice benchmarking using clustering methods: Application to energy regulation , 2014, Omega.

[13]  Ahmad Makui,et al.  An interactive robust data envelopment analysis model for determining alternative targets in Iranian electricity distribution companies , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Aydın Çelen,et al.  Efficiency and productivity (TFP) of the Turkish electricity distribution companies: An application of two-stage (DEA&Tobit) analysis , 2013 .

[15]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making : an introduction , 1995 .

[16]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  Estimating and decomposing productivity growth of the electricity generation industry in Malaysia: A stochastic frontier analysis , 2013 .

[17]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring Information Technology's Indirect Impact on Firm Performance , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[18]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[19]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[20]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A fuzzy group data envelopment analysis model for high-technology project selection: A case study at NASA , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[22]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  A new approach for multiple objective decision making , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[23]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  W. Cook,et al.  Sales performance measurement in bank branches , 2001 .

[25]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for two‐stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition , 2008 .

[26]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  Information technology's impact on productivity in conventional power plants , 2009 .

[28]  K. Khalili-Damghani,et al.  A three-stage fuzzy DEA approach to measure performance of a serial process including JIT practices, agility indices, and goals in supply chains , 2012 .

[29]  W. Cook,et al.  Multicomponent Efficiency Measurement and Shared Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Sales and Service Performance in Bank Branches , 2000 .

[30]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  R. Färe,et al.  Slacks and congestion: a comment , 2000 .

[32]  Lie-Chien Lin,et al.  Application of DEA and SFA on the Measurement of Operating Efficiencies for 27 International Container Ports , 2005 .

[33]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[34]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[35]  Ali Asghar Foroughi,et al.  Inputs/outputs estimation in DEA when some factors are undesirable , 2004, Appl. Math. Comput..

[36]  Kaveh Khalili Damghani,et al.  A fuzzy two-stage DEA approach for performance measurement: real case of agility performance in dairy supply chains , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci..

[37]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Evaluation of Ranking Accuracy in Multi-Criteria Decisions , 2006, Informatica.

[38]  Johannes Bisschop,et al.  AIMMS - Optimization Modeling , 2006 .

[39]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  An application of data envelopment analysis in telephone offices evaluation with partial data , 1999, Comput. Oper. Res..

[40]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[41]  K. Khalili-Damghani,et al.  Sensitivity and stability analysis in two-stage DEA models with fuzzy data , 2013 .

[42]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2015 .

[43]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: A review and future perspective , 2010 .

[44]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A new two-stage Stackelberg fuzzy data envelopment analysis model , 2014 .

[45]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking , 2003 .

[46]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in data envelopment analysis , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[47]  Yongjun Li,et al.  DEA Models for Extended Two-Stage Network Structures , 2012 .