Development and validation of an automated operational modal analysis algorithm for vibration-based monitoring and tensile load estimation

Abstract In the last few decades large research efforts have been devoted to the development of methods for automated detection of damage and degradation phenomena at an early stage. Modal-based damage detection techniques are well-established methods, whose effectiveness for Level 1 (existence) and Level 2 (location) damage detection is demonstrated by several studies. The indirect estimation of tensile loads in cables and tie-rods is another attractive application of vibration measurements. It provides interesting opportunities for cheap and fast quality checks in the construction phase, as well as for safety evaluations and structural maintenance over the structure lifespan. However, the lack of automated modal identification and tracking procedures has been for long a relevant drawback to the extensive application of the above-mentioned techniques in the engineering practice. An increasing number of field applications of modal-based structural health and performance assessment are appearing after the development of several automated output-only modal identification procedures in the last few years. Nevertheless, additional efforts are still needed to enhance the robustness of automated modal identification algorithms, control the computational efforts and improve the reliability of modal parameter estimates (in particular, damping). This paper deals with an original algorithm for automated output-only modal parameter estimation. Particular emphasis is given to the extensive validation of the algorithm based on simulated and real datasets in view of continuous monitoring applications. The results point out that the algorithm is fairly robust and demonstrate its ability to provide accurate and precise estimates of the modal parameters, including damping ratios. As a result, it has been used to develop systems for vibration-based estimation of tensile loads in cables and tie-rods. Promising results have been achieved for non-destructive testing as well as continuous monitoring purposes. They are documented in the last sections of the paper.

[1]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Identification of axial forces in beam members by local vibration measurements , 2013 .

[2]  Palle Andersen,et al.  Using EFDD as a Robust Technique for Deterministic Excitation in Operational Modal Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  P. Guillaume,et al.  The PolyMAX Frequency-Domain Method: A New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation? , 2004 .

[4]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Automated output-only dynamic identification of civil engineering structures , 2010 .

[5]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[6]  Bart Peeters,et al.  System identification and damage detection in civil engineering , 2000 .

[7]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  Non-destructive characterization and dynamic identification of a modern heritage building for serviceability seismic analyses , 2013 .

[8]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[9]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Dynamic structural health monitoring of Saint Torcato church , 2013 .

[10]  Antoine Souloumiac,et al.  Jacobi Angles for Simultaneous Diagonalization , 1996, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[11]  Marco Amabili,et al.  Estimation of tensile force in tie-rods using a frequency-based identification method , 2010 .

[12]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Monitoring a 5 MW offshore wind energy converter—Condition parameters and triangulation based extraction of modal parameters , 2013 .

[13]  Eric Moulines,et al.  A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .

[15]  Rune Brincker,et al.  Modal identification of output-only systems using frequency domain decomposition , 2001 .

[16]  Vipin Kumar,et al.  Introduction to Data Mining , 2022, Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications.

[17]  Giovanni Fabbrocino,et al.  A hybrid automated modal identification algorithm for Structural Health Monitoring: a comparative assessment , 2012 .

[18]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering Structures: An Introduction and Guide for Applications , 2014 .

[19]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[20]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Influence of model order and number of block rows on accuracy and precision of modal parameter estimates in stochastic subspace identification , 2014 .

[21]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Integrated seismic early warning and structural health monitoring of critical civil infrastructures in seismically prone areas , 2011 .

[22]  J. Juang Applied system identification , 1994 .

[23]  Giovanni Rebecchi,et al.  Estimate of the axial force in slender beams with unknown boundary conditions using one flexural mode shape , 2013 .

[24]  Joseph Lardies,et al.  Modal parameter identification of stay cables from output-only measurements , 2011 .

[25]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Structural health monitoring of a stress-ribbon footbridge , 2013 .

[26]  Helmut Wenzel,et al.  Ambient Vibration Monitoring , 2005 .

[27]  Nerio Tullini,et al.  Dynamic identification of beam axial loads using one flexural mode shape , 2008 .

[28]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Perspectives of Second-Order Blind Identification for Operational Modal Analysis of Civil Structures , 2014 .

[29]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  The dynamical identification of the tensile force in ancient tie-rods , 2005 .

[30]  David J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, And Application , 2000 .

[31]  M. Scionti,et al.  Stabilisation diagrams: Pole identification using fuzzy clustering techniques , 2005, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Near real-time tracking of dynamic properties for standalone structural health monitoring systems , 2011 .

[33]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[34]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Evaluating Different Automated Operational Modal Analysis Techniques for the Continuous Monitoring of Offshore Wind Turbines , 2014 .

[35]  Giovanni Fabbrocino,et al.  Performance assessment of selected OMA techniques for dynamic identification of geotechnical systems and closely spaced structural modes , 2011 .

[36]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[37]  E. Parloo,et al.  AUTONOMOUS STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING—PART I: MODAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION AND TRACKING , 2002 .

[38]  D. Rixen,et al.  Identifying mode shapes and modal frequencies by operational modal analysis in the presence of harmonic excitation , 2005 .

[39]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .