Technique for quantification of embodied carbon footprint of construction projects using probabilistic emission factor estimators

Abstract Buildings consume a significant proportion of the world's resources, mostly in the form of materials usage. In addition, with the ongoing efforts focusing on reducing the operational energy consumption of buildings, the embodied emissions of buildings are expected to increase in proportion in the future. With the increasing focus placed on the embodied emissions of buildings, organizations in the construction industry will face requirements to report information regarding the embodied emissions of buildings. However, in order to obtain the embodied emission of buildings, tremendous efforts have to be placed as the process is data intensive. In order to overcome this challenge, a streamlined technique is proposed to minimize the efforts required by practitioner to obtain the embodied carbon footprint. The proposed technique comprises a probabilistic model of emission factor estimators used to estimate the required embodied emissions. Based on the four projects presented as case study for the proposed technique, the practitioner would be required to manually match the appropriate emission factors to the activity data for between 12 and 21% of the data points. This is in contrast to the current traditional technique, which requires the manual matching of 100% of data points. The resultant deviation of the computed embodied carbon footprint from the proposed technique and the current technique was between −0.25% and +3.65%.

[1]  J. Fava,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results , 2006 .

[2]  H. J. Holtzhausen.  Embodied energy and its impact on architectural decisions , 2007 .

[3]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[4]  Sara Pax,et al.  A Survey of Life Cycle Assessment Practitioners with a Focus on the Agri‐Food Sector , 2011 .

[5]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Eco-efficient construction and building materials research under the EU Framework Programme Horizon 2020 , 2014 .

[6]  A. P. Gursel,et al.  A life-cycle approach to environmental, mechanical, and durability properties of “green” concrete mixes with rice husk ash , 2016 .

[7]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[8]  Justo Garcia Navarro,et al.  Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact , 2006 .

[9]  Ruisheng Ng,et al.  Method for Rapid Estimation of Carbon Footprint Involving Complex Building Inventory Data - A Case Study , 2013 .

[10]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  Mathematical modelling of embodied energy, greenhouse gases, waste, time–cost parameters of building projects: A review , 2013 .

[11]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[12]  Catarina Thormark,et al.  A low energy building in a life cycle - its embodied energy, energy need for operation and recycling potential , 2002 .

[13]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[14]  Bin Song,et al.  An Algorithmic Approach to Streamlining Product Carbon Footprint Quantification: A Case Study on Sheet Metal Parts , 2012, International Journal of Automation Technology.

[15]  David Rousseau,et al.  Environmental auditing for building construction: Energy and air pollution indices for building materials , 1992 .

[16]  David Pearlmutter,et al.  A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert , 2008 .

[17]  Peter Wild,et al.  Inadequate documentation in published life cycle energy reports on buildings , 2010 .

[18]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[19]  Anne Grete Hestnes,et al.  Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article , 2007 .

[20]  Matt Syal,et al.  Review of Life-Cycle Assessment Applications in Building Construction , 2011 .

[21]  Åsa Jönsson.  Life Cycle Assessment of Building Products. Case Studies and Methodology , 1998 .

[22]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Embodied energy of building materials and green building rating systems — a case study for industrial halls , 2010 .

[23]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[24]  Christoph J. Meinrenken,et al.  Fast Carbon Footprinting for Large Product Portfolios , 2012 .

[25]  Ignacio Zabalza Bribián,et al.  Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential , 2011 .

[26]  Roger J. Plank.  The principles of sustainable construction , 2008 .

[27]  Michiya Suzuki,et al.  Estimation of life cycle energy consumption and CO2 emission of office buildings in Japan , 1998 .

[28]  Craig Langston,et al.  Reliability of building embodied energy modelling: an analysis of 30 Melbourne case studies , 2008 .

[29]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects , 2013 .

[30]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[31]  Adolf Acquaye,et al.  Operational vs. embodied emissions in buildings—A review of current trends , 2013 .

[32]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Environmental impacts and benefits of the end-of-life of building materials – calculation rules, results and contribution to a “cradle to cradle” life cycle , 2014 .

[33]  Other.  Buildings and Climate Change: Status, Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .