The contribution of the fusiform gyrus and superior temporal sulcus in processing facial attractiveness: Neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence

Current cognitive models suggest that the processing of dynamic facial attributes, including social signals such as gaze direction and facial expression, involves the superior temporal sulcus, whereas the processing of invariant facial structure such as the individuals' identity involves the fusiform face area. Where facial attractiveness, a social signal that may emerge from invariant facial structure, is processed within this dual-route model of face perception is uncertain. Here, we present two studies. First, we investigated the explicit judgments of facial attractiveness and attractiveness-motivated behavior in patients with acquired prosopagnosia, a deficit in familiar face recognition usually associated with damage to medial occipitotemporal cortex. We found that both abilities were impaired in these patients, with some weak residual ability for attractiveness judgments found only in those patients with unilateral right occipitotemporal or bilateral anterior temporal lesions. Importantly, deficits in attractiveness perception correlated with the severity of the face recognition deficit. Second, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study in healthy subjects that included an implicit and explicit processing of facial attractiveness. We found increased neural activity when explicitly judging facial attractiveness within a number of cortical regions including the fusiform face area, but not the superior temporal sulcus, indicating a potential contribution of the fusiform face area to this judgment. Thus, converging neuropsychological and neuroimaging evidence points to a critical role of the inferior occipitotemporal cortex in the processing of facial attractiveness.

[1]  J. Keenan,et al.  Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Catherine J. Mondloch,et al.  What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[6]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Covert recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  D. Maurer,et al.  Effects of the Height of the Internal Features of Faces on Adults' Aesthetic Ratings and 5-Month-Olds' Looking Times , 1999, Perception.

[9]  廣瀬雄一,et al.  Neuroscience , 2019, Workplace Attachments.

[10]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Face Perception Is Modulated by Sexual Preference , 2006, Current Biology.

[11]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[13]  N. Hadjikhani,et al.  A modulatory role for facial expressions in prosopagnosia , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  C. Niemitz,et al.  Results of an explorative empirical study on human mating in Germany: handsome men, not high-status men, succeed in courtship. , 2003, Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur.

[15]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Barton Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.

[17]  A. Benton,et al.  Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. , 1972, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[18]  M. Bradley,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of pleasant and unpleasant emotion , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[20]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The perception of facial attractiveness in prosopagnosia , 2004 .

[21]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  J. C. Meadows The anatomical basis of prosopagnosia , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[25]  Alumit Ishai,et al.  Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  J. Barton,et al.  Disorders of face perception and recognition. , 2003, Neurologic clinics.

[27]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[29]  T. Allison,et al.  Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  K. C. Brewer,et al.  Warrington recognition memory test performance in an epileptic population , 1996 .

[31]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  A. Ishai,et al.  Effective connectivity within the distributed cortical network for face perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  The covert priming effect of faces in prosopagnosia , 2004, Neurology.

[34]  J. Keenan,et al.  Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia , 2002, Neurology.

[35]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Covert Processing of Faces in Prosopagnosia Is Restricted to Facial Expressions: Evidence from Cross-Modal Bias , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[36]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[37]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  D. Perrett,et al.  Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Conny F. Schmidt,et al.  Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[40]  D. Ariely,et al.  Beautiful Faces Have Variable Reward Value fMRI and Behavioral Evidence , 2001, Neuron.

[41]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Perceptual Functions in Prosopagnosia , 2004, Perception.

[42]  K. Heilman,et al.  Processing of faces by patients with unilateral hemisphere lesions I. Dissociation between judgments of facial affect and facial identity , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[43]  G. Rhodes The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  I. Frieze,et al.  Attractiveness and Income for Men and Women in Management1 , 1991 .

[46]  A. Nakamura,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness , 1998, Neuroreport.

[47]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  K. Cave,et al.  Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.