Radio-Frequency Identification Specimen Tracking to Improve Quality in Anatomic Pathology.

CONTEXT.— Preanalytic errors, including specimen-labeling errors and specimen loss, occur frequently during specimen collection, transit, and accessioning. Radio-frequency identification tags can decrease specimen identification and tracking errors through continuous and automated tracking of specimens. OBJECTIVE.— To implement a specimen-tracking infrastructure to reduce preanalytic errors (specimen mislabeling or loss) between specimen collection and laboratory accessioning. Specific goals were to decrease preanalytic errors by at least 70% and to simultaneously decrease employee effort dedicated to resolving preanalytic errors or investigating lost specimens. DESIGN.— A radio-frequency identification specimen-tracking system was developed. Major features included integral radio-frequency identification labels (radio-frequency identification tags and traditional bar codes in a single printed label) printed by point-of-care printers in collection suites; dispersed radio-frequency identification readers at major transit points; and systems integration of the electronic health record, laboratory information system, and radio-frequency identification tracking system to allow for computerized physician order entry-driven label generation, specimen-transit-time tracking, interval-based alarms, and automated accessioning. RESULTS.— In the 6-month postimplementation period, 6 mislabeling events occurred in collection areas using the radio-frequency identification system, compared with 24 events in the 6-month preimplementation period (75% decrease; P = .001). In addition, the system led to the timely recovery of 3 lost specimens. Labeling expenses were decreased substantially in the transition from high-frequency to ultrahigh-frequency radio-frequency identification tags. CONCLUSIONS.— Radio-frequency identification specimen tracking prevented several potential specimen-loss events, decreased specimen recovery time, and decreased specimen-labeling errors. Increases in labeling/tracking expenses for the system were more than offset by time savings and loss avoidance though error mitigation.

[1]  P. VanderLaan,et al.  Pre‐analytic error: A significant patient safety risk , 2018, Cancer cytopathology.

[2]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Bar Coding and Tracking in Pathology. , 2015, Surgical pathology clinics.

[3]  The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization. , 2009 .

[4]  W. Mayr,et al.  Best paper prize of Vox Sanguinis for 2008 , 2010 .

[5]  T. Raife,et al.  Tracking blood products in hospitals using radio frequency identification: Lessons from a pilot implementation , 2013 .

[6]  P. Valenstein,et al.  Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine. , 2004, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[7]  Robert H Christenson,et al.  Effectiveness of barcoding for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Clinical biochemistry.

[8]  Jerry J. Lou,et al.  Tolerance testing of passive radio frequency identification tags for solvent, temperature, and pressure conditions encountered in an anatomic pathology or biorepository setting , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[9]  Jerry J. Lou,et al.  A review of radio frequency identification technology for the anatomic pathology or biorepository laboratory: Much promise, some progress, and more work needed , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[10]  R. Nakhleh,et al.  Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions. , 1996, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[11]  László Monostori,et al.  THE RFID TECHNOLOGY AND ITS CURRENT APPLICATIONS , 2006 .

[12]  Edward J. Dunn,et al.  Patient misidentification in laboratory medicine: a qualitative analysis of 227 root cause analysis reports in the Veterans Health Administration. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  J. Baron,et al.  Computerized provider order entry in the clinical laboratory , 2011, Journal of pathology informatics.

[14]  S. Sanderson,et al.  A Quality Initiative to Decrease Pathology Specimen–Labeling Errors Using Radiofrequency Identification in a High-Volume Endoscopy Center , 2008, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[15]  R. Nakhleh Lost, Mislabeled, and Unsuitable Surgical Pathology Specimens , 2003 .

[16]  David G Bostwick Radiofrequency identification specimen tracking in anatomical pathology: pilot study of 1067 consecutive prostate biopsies. , 2013, Annals of diagnostic pathology.

[17]  Ann Ferriter,et al.  Radiofrequency identification technology in health care: benefits and potential risks. , 2007, JAMA.

[18]  Jerry Holcombe,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of RFID Technology in Transfusion Medicine , 2010, Vox sanguinis.

[19]  Dong Sam Ha,et al.  An overview of passive RFID , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[20]  R. Nakhleh Role of Informatics in Patient Safety and Quality Assurance. , 2015, Surgical pathology clinics.