A Sticky Weighted Regression Model for Time-Varying Resting-State Brain Connectivity Estimation

Despite recent progress on brain connectivity modeling using neuroimaging data such as fMRI, most current approaches assume that brain connectivity networks have time-invariant topology/coefficients. This is clearly problematic as the brain is inherently nonstationary. Here, we present a time-varying model to investigate the temporal dynamics of brain connectivity networks. The proposed method allows for abrupt changes in network structure via a fused least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) scheme, as well as recovery of time-varying networks with smoothly changing coefficients via a weighted regression technique. Simulations demonstrate that the proposed method yields improved accuracy on estimating time-dependent connectivity patterns when compared to a static sparse regression model or a weighted time-varying regression model. When applied to real resting-state fMRI datasets from Parkinson's disease (PD) and control subjects, significantly different temporal and spatial patterns were found to be associated with PD. Specifically, PD subjects demonstrated reduced network variability over time, which may be related to impaired cognitive flexibility previously reported in PD. The temporal dynamic properties of brain connectivity in PD subjects may provide insights into brain dynamics associated with PD and may serve as a potential biomarker in future studies.

[1]  M. McKeown,et al.  Levodopa-sensitive, dynamic changes in effective connectivity during simultaneous movements in Parkinson's disease , 2009, Neuroscience.

[2]  E. Xing,et al.  Statistical Estimation of Correlated Genome Associations to a Quantitative Trait Network , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[3]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  Larry A. Wasserman,et al.  Time varying undirected graphs , 2008, Machine Learning.

[5]  Daniel A. Handwerker,et al.  Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  João Ricardo Sato,et al.  A method to produce evolving functional connectivity maps during the course of an fMRI experiment using wavelet-based time-varying Granger causality , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  Tso-Jung Yen,et al.  Discussion on "Stability Selection" by Meinshausen and Buhlmann , 2010 .

[8]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso , 2005 .

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Resting‐state networks show dynamic functional connectivity in awake humans and anesthetized macaques , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Joint amplitude and connectivity compensatory mechanisms in Parkinson's disease , 2010, Neuroscience.

[15]  Xiaohui Chen,et al.  A Two-Graph Guided Multi-task Lasso Approach for eQTL Mapping , 2012, AISTATS.

[16]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Time Varying Dynamic Bayesian Network for Nonstationary Events Modeling and Online Inference , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[18]  Bernard Ng,et al.  Motor reserve and novel area recruitment: amplitude and spatial characteristics of compensation in Parkinson’s disease , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[19]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty , 2012, NeuroImage.

[20]  Dajiang Zhu,et al.  Dynamic functional connectomics signatures for characterization and differentiation of PTSD patients , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[21]  Philip Bachman,et al.  Improved Estimation in Time Varying Models , 2012, ICML.

[22]  Le Song,et al.  Sparsistent Learning of Varying-coefficient Models with Structural Changes , 2009, NIPS.

[23]  Xi Chen,et al.  Smoothing proximal gradient method for general structured sparse regression , 2010, The Annals of Applied Statistics.

[24]  Aiping Liu,et al.  A Computationally Efficient, Exploratory Approach to Brain Connectivity Incorporating False Discovery Rate Control, A Priori Knowledge, and Group Inference , 2012, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[25]  Vangelis P. Oikonomou,et al.  A Sparse and Spatially Constrained Generative Regression Model for fMRI Data Analysis , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Dynamic connectivity regression: Determining state-related changes in brain connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian model selection for group studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Brain covariance selection: better individual functional connectivity models using population prior , 2010, NIPS.

[30]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Stability selection , 2008, 0809.2932.

[31]  David T. Jones,et al.  Non-Stationarity in the “Resting Brain’s” Modular Architecture , 2012, PloS one.

[32]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Estimating brain functional connectivity with sparse multivariate autoregression , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Kent A. Kiehl,et al.  A method for evaluating dynamic functional network connectivity and task-modulation: application to schizophrenia , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[34]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[35]  Hillary D. Schwarb,et al.  Short‐time windows of correlation between large‐scale functional brain networks predict vigilance intraindividually and interindividually , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Yong He,et al.  Characterizing dynamic functional connectivity in the resting brain using variable parameter regression and Kalman filtering approaches , 2011, NeuroImage.

[37]  Alexander J. Hartemink,et al.  Learning Non-Stationary Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[38]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[39]  Andreas A Ioannides,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Aiping Liu,et al.  A Genetically Informed, Group fMRI Connectivity Modeling Approach: Application to Schizophrenia , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[41]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Modeling state-related fMRI activity using change-point theory , 2007, NeuroImage.

[42]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: A comparison of group-analysis methods , 2008, NeuroImage.

[43]  Le Song,et al.  Time-Varying Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2009, NIPS.