Relative en- and exophthalmometry in zygomatic fractures comparing optical non-contact, non-ionizing 3D imaging to the Hertel instrument and computed tomography.

AIM It is the aim of the present study to introduce non-contact, non-invasive optical 3D imaging to relative exophthalmometry and to compare the resulting data to exophthalmometry values assessed by the Hertel instrument and computed tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS 20 patients (3 female, 17 male, 44.4+/-16.6 years) without orbital pathology, who were examined by computed tomography of head and neck for the exclusion of different diseases, and seven patients (1 female, 6 male, 40.1+/-14.4 years), who received routine orbital computed tomography because of zygomatic fractures, were included in the study. Optical 3D images of the facial surface were assessed and Hertel exophthalmometry was carried out to determine the relative globe position. In patients with zygomatic fractures the assessment of optical 3D images and Hertel values was repeated 5 days after surgery. RESULTS For patients without orbital pathology relative exophthalmometry data were 1.4+/-1.1 mm for the Hertel instrument, 0.9+/-1.0 mm for computed tomography and 0.5+/-0.5 mm for optical 3D imaging. The values for Hertel exophthalmometry and computed tomography did not differ statistically significantly (p(Herteldifferencepreop/CTdifferencepreop)=0.284), while there was a significant difference between Hertel exophthalmometry and optical 3D imaging (p(Herteldifferencepreop/opticaldifferencepreop)=0.008). In the cases of zygomatic fractures, Hertel exophthalmometry revealed less pronounced relative differences in globe position than CT and optical 3D imaging data (Hertel 0.7+/-1.1 mm, CT 1.9+/-1.0 mm, optical 3D imaging 1.9+/-1.0 mm). Postoperatively, relative Hertel exophthalmometry showed an increased value revealing a more pronounced enophthalmos (1.7+/-1.0 mm), while the corresponding value of the optical 3D images decreased as a sign for normalization of the globe position (1.1+/-0.7 mm). CONCLUSION Because of its reliance on the lateral orbital rims Hertel exophthalmometry can lead to an under- or overestimation of enophthalmos, when soft tissue oedema or a dislocation of the orbital rim are present. The combination of computed tomography as baseline measurement and optical 3D imaging for the follow-up examinations reveal more realistic data in cases of zygomatic fractures. Therefore, they should be preferred to the determination of Hertel values especially in more complex cases.

[1]  Y. Kawano.  Three dimensional analysis of the face in respect of zygomatic fractures and evaluation of the surgery with the aid of Moiré topography. , 1987, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[2]  P. Manson,et al.  Studies on Enophthalmos: II. The Measurement of Orbital Injuries and Their Treatment by Quantitative Computed Tomography , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  P. Manson,et al.  Orbital volumetric analysis: clinical application in orbitozygomatic complex injuries. , 1997, The Journal of cranio-maxillofacial trauma.

[4]  J. Schmitz,et al.  The use of the Naugle orbitometer in maxillofacial trauma. , 1999, The Journal of cranio-maxillofacial trauma.

[5]  G. Häusler,et al.  Simple, robust and accurate phase-measuring triangulation , 1992 .

[6]  R. Yeatts,et al.  Measurement of Globe Position in Complex Orbital Fractures. I. A Modification of Hertel's Exophthalmometer, Using the External Auditory Canal as a Reference Point , 1992, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  M Davanger,et al.  Principles and sources of error in exophthalmometry. A new exophthalmometer. , 1970, Acta ophthalmologica.

[8]  Ezatollah Hazrati.  Distance from symmetry: A three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. , 1996 .

[9]  P. Manson,et al.  Mechanisms of Global Support and Posttraumatic Enophthalmos: I. The Anatomy of the Ligament Sling and Its Relation to Intramuscular Cone Orbital Fat , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Relationship of the eye to the bony orbit, with clinical correlations. , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  I. Kim,et al.  Normal Range of Exophthalmos Values on Orbit Computerized Tomography in Koreans , 2001, Ophthalmologica.

[12]  Yeatts Rp.  Measurement of globe position in complex orbital fractures. II. Patient evaluation utilizing a modified exophthalmometer. , 1992 .

[13]  B. Haik,et al.  Exophthalmometry: A Comparative Study of the Naugle and Hertel Instruments , 1997, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  Taylor Cl,et al.  Measurement of Globe Position in Complex Orbital Fractures. I. A Modification of Hertel's Exophthalmometer, Using the External Auditory Canal as a Reference Point , 1992 .

[15]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  The Symmetry of Faces , 2002, VMV.

[16]  J R Landis,et al.  The reliability of Hertel exophthalmometry. Observer variation between physician and lay readers. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[17]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Validation of In Vivo Assessment of Facial Soft‐Tissue Volume Changes and Clinical Application in Midfacial Distraction: A Technical Report , 2003, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[18]  L. Frisén.  CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF EXOPHTHALMOMETRY. AN EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL AND EXTENDED METHODS , 1967, Acta ophthalmologica.