Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Katherine W L Vig | K. Vig | Allen R Firestone | Matthew Mayers | Robert Rashid | R. Rashid | A. Firestone | M. Mayers
[1] Bernard R. Rosner,et al. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .
[2] C D Stephens,et al. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.
[3] H. Pancherz,et al. Efficiency of early and late Class II Division 1 treatment. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[4] K. Vig,et al. Evaluation of the peer assessment rating (PAR) index as an index of orthodontic treatment need. , 2002, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[5] Mark Beatrice,et al. Vertical facial pattern and orthodontic stability Part II: Facial axis changes and stability , 2000, Australian orthodontic journal.
[6] J. Bartko,et al. Simulation study of a panel of reliability indicators applied to paired measurements , 1994, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.
[7] K. Vig,et al. Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies--strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics. , 1998, Clinical Orthodontics and Research.
[8] Oded Zilberman,et al. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[9] K. Vig,et al. Factors associated with orthodontists' assessment of difficulty. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[10] J. Fischer,et al. A comparison of 3 computerized Bolton tooth-size analyses with a commonly used method. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[11] S. McGorray,et al. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[12] K. Vig,et al. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in educational and private practice settings. , 2002, Journal of Dental Education.
[13] Allen R Firestone,et al. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.
[14] S Richmond,et al. The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. , 1992, European journal of orthodontics.
[15] Thomas J Cangialosi,et al. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[16] K. Vig,et al. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.