Agent-based modeling of porous scaffold degradation and vascularization: Optimal scaffold design based on architecture and degradation dynamics.

UNLABELLED A multi-layer agent-based model (ABM) of biomaterial scaffold vascularization is extended to consider the effects of scaffold degradation kinetics on blood vessel formation. A degradation model describing the bulk disintegration of porous hydrogels is incorporated into the ABM. The combined degradation-angiogenesis model is used to investigate growing blood vessel networks in the presence of a degradable scaffold structure. Simulation results indicate that higher porosity, larger mean pore size, and rapid degradation allow faster vascularization when not considering the structural support of the scaffold. However, premature loss of structural support results in failure for the material. A strategy using multi-layer scaffold with different degradation rates in each layer was investigated as a way to address this issue. Vascularization was improved with the multi-layered scaffold model compared to the single-layer model. The ABM developed provides insight into the characteristics that influence the selection of optimal geometric parameters and degradation behavior of scaffolds, and enables easy refinement of the model as new knowledge about the underlying biological phenomena becomes available. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE This paper proposes a multi-layer agent-based model (ABM) of biomaterial scaffold vascularization integrated with a structural-kinetic model describing bulk degradation of porous hydrogels to consider the effects of scaffold degradation kinetics on blood vessel formation. This enables the assessment of scaffold characteristics and in particular the disintegration characteristics of the scaffold on angiogenesis. Simulation results indicate that higher porosity, larger mean pore size, and rapid degradation allow faster vascularization when not considering the structural support of the scaffold. However, premature loss of structural support by scaffold disintegration results in failure of the material and disruption of angiogenesis. A strategy using multi-layer scaffold with different degradation rates in each layer was investigated as away to address this issue. Vascularization was improved with the multi-layered scaffold model compared to the single-layer model. The ABM developed provides insight into the characteristics that influence the selection of optimal geometric and degradation characteristics of tissue engineering scaffolds.

[1]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Michael S Sacks,et al.  On the biomechanical function of scaffolds for engineering load-bearing soft tissues. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[3]  Sara Checa,et al.  Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[4]  S. Hollister.  Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering , 2005, Nature materials.

[5]  F. M. Gabhann,et al.  Integration of experimental and computational approaches to sprouting angiogenesis , 2012, Current opinion in hematology.

[6]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[7]  Jeroen Rouwkema,et al.  Vascularization in tissue engineering. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[8]  Stephanie J Bryant,et al.  Encapsulating chondrocytes in degrading PEG hydrogels with high modulus: Engineering gel structural changes to facilitate cartilaginous tissue production , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[9]  S. J. Hollister,et al.  Engineering Scaffold Mechanical and Mass Transport Properties , 2011 .

[10]  Hak Soo Choi,et al.  Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging for Noninvasive Trafficking of Scaffold Degradation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[11]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Mechanical properties, proteolytic degradability and biological modifications affect angiogenic process extension into native and modified fibrin matrices in vitro. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[12]  Paul A. Bates,et al.  Tipping the Balance: Robustness of Tip Cell Selection, Migration and Fusion in Angiogenesis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  E. Brey,et al.  Endothelial Cell–Matrix Interactions in Neovascularization , 2008 .

[14]  K. Leong,et al.  Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[15]  Ming-Huei Cheng,et al.  The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[16]  Chad Johnson,et al.  The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[17]  Z. Galis,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinase 9 facilitates collagen remodeling and angiogenesis for vascular constructs. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[18]  Silviya P Zustiak,et al.  Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[19]  M. Liebschner,et al.  Scaffold pore space modulation through intelligent design of dissolvable microparticles. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[20]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[21]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Modeling the early stages of vascular network assembly , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  Ali Cinar,et al.  An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[23]  Michael Bergdorf,et al.  A hybrid model for three-dimensional simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[24]  C. Bowman,et al.  Development and Characterization of Degradable Thiol-Allyl Ether Photopolymers. , 2007, Polymer.

[25]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems. , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[26]  Vittorio Cristini,et al.  Patient-calibrated agent-based modelling of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): from microscopic measurements to macroscopic predictions of clinical progression. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Anthony Atala,et al.  Principals of neovascularization for tissue engineering. , 2002, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[28]  Sharon Gerecht,et al.  Vascular tissue engineering: biodegradable scaffold platforms to promote angiogenesis , 2013, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[29]  K Zygourakis,et al.  Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[30]  Christopher N. Bowman,et al.  A Statistical Kinetic Model for the Bulk Degradation of PLA-b-PEG-b-PLA Hydrogel Networks: Incorporating Network Non-Idealities , 2001 .

[31]  A. Metters,et al.  A Statistical Kinetic Model for the Bulk Degradation of PLA-b-PEG-b-PLA Hydrogel Networks , 2000 .

[32]  C. Patrick,et al.  Three-Dimensional, Quantitative Analysis of Desmin and Smooth Muscle Alpha Actin Expression During Angiogenesis , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Kazuo Tanishita,et al.  Effects of the mechanical properties of collagen gel on the in vitro formation of microvessel networks by endothelial cells. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[34]  T. Adachi,et al.  Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[35]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Mathematical modeling of degradation for bulk-erosive polymers: applications in tissue engineering scaffolds and drug delivery systems. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[36]  J Tramper,et al.  The effect of PEGT/PBT scaffold architecture on oxygen gradients in tissue engineered cartilaginous constructs. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[37]  D. Ingber,et al.  Prevascularization of porous biodegradable polymers , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[38]  Shayn M Peirce,et al.  Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Angiogenesis , 2008, Microcirculation.

[39]  P. Tracqui,et al.  In vitro angiogenesis is modulated by the mechanical properties of fibrin gels and is related to αvβ3 integrin localization , 1997, In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal.

[40]  E. S. Bayrak,et al.  Pore Interconnectivity Influences Growth Factor-Mediated Vascularization in Sphere-Templated Hydrogels. , 2015, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[41]  Y. Cao,et al.  In vivo angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis models. , 2009, Current molecular medicine.

[42]  Chaozong Liu,et al.  Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2007 .

[43]  B. Long,et al.  Cells as state machines: cell behavior patterns arise during capillary formation as a function of BDNF and VEGF. , 2013, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  David Dean,et al.  Evaluating 3D‐Printed Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering , 2015, Advanced materials.

[46]  Domenico Ribatti,et al.  "Sprouting angiogenesis", a reappraisal. , 2012, Developmental biology.

[47]  W. Saltzman.  Tissue Engineering: Engineering Principles for the Design of Replacement Organs and Tissues , 2004 .

[48]  Eric M. Brey,et al.  Evaluation of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Porous Poly (Ethylene Glycol)-co-(L-Lactic Acid) Hydrogels during Degradation , 2013, PloS one.

[49]  John R. King,et al.  Individual-based modelling of angiogenesis inside three-dimensional porous biomaterials , 2011, Biosyst..

[50]  Swee Hin Teoh,et al.  Evaluation of polycaprolactone scaffold degradation for 6 months in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[51]  A. Mansur,et al.  3D-macroporous hybrid scaffolds for tissue engineering: Network design and mathematical modeling of the degradation kinetics , 2012 .

[52]  Cameron F Abrams,et al.  Strategies to enhance capillary formation inside biomaterials: a computational study. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[53]  Anusuya Das,et al.  A hybrid continuum–discrete modelling approach to predict and control angiogenesis: analysis of combinatorial growth factor and matrix effects on vessel-sprouting morphology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[54]  Martin Meier-Schellersheim,et al.  Multiscale modeling for biologists , 2009, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine.

[55]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Prevention of Postoperative Adhesions in the Rat by In Situ Photopolymerization of Bioresorbable Hydrogel Barriers , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  J. Fisher,et al.  Soft and hard tissue response to photocrosslinked poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds in a rabbit model. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[57]  J. Folkman,et al.  Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during tumor angiogenesis. , 1977, Microvascular research.

[58]  P. Tracqui,et al.  In vitro angiogenesis is modulated by the mechanical properties of fibrin gels and is related to alpha(v)beta3 integrin localization. , 1997, In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal.

[59]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[60]  R. Langer,et al.  Biomaterials in drug delivery and tissue engineering: one laboratory's experience. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[61]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for Biomedical Simulation: Modeling Vascularization of Porous Scaffolds , 2011, PRIMA.

[62]  A.A. Qutub,et al.  Multiscale models of angiogenesis , 2009, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[63]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis , 1998, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[64]  Sara Checa,et al.  Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: a mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[65]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Fundamental studies of a novel, biodegradable PEG-b-PLA hydrogel , 2000 .

[66]  G. Ateshian,et al.  Scaffold degradation elevates the collagen content and dynamic compressive modulus in engineered articular cartilage. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[67]  Katie Bentley,et al.  Predicting the future: towards symbiotic computational and experimental angiogenesis research. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[68]  Kyongbum Lee,et al.  Vascularization strategies for tissue engineering. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[69]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Three-dimensional modeling of angiogenesis in porous biomaterial scaffolds. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[70]  C. Bowman,et al.  Modeling of network degradation in mixed step-chain growth polymerizations , 2005 .

[71]  P R Fernandes,et al.  Permeability analysis of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[72]  D. A. Garzón-Alvarado,et al.  Modeling porous scaffold microstructure by a reaction-diffusion system and its degradation by hydrolysis , 2012, Comput. Biol. Medicine.