The Role of Ego Enhancement and Perceived Message Exposure in Third-Person Judgments Concerning Violent Video Games

Ego enhancement has been offered as the psychological mechanism that drives differences in judgments about effects on self and others. This study employs a three-cell (ego threat, ego enhancement, and control) experimental design to test the validity of the ego-enhancement argument in explaining the third-person perception and related outcomes (e.g., support for government control). Findings indicate that although ego enhancement does not appear to directly influence either third-person perception or its relationship to support for government control, it does play a moderating role in regulating the relationship between perceived effects and support for controls, especially in the case of perceived effects on others. Specifically, the ego-enhancement condition effectively muted the relationship between estimates of effects and support for government control. Implications of these findings and directions for further research are also discussed.

[1]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[2]  Jeremy Cohen,et al.  Third-Person Effects and the Differential Impact in Negative Political Advertising , 1991 .

[3]  Patrick C. Meirick.  Rethinking the Target Corollary : The Effects of Social Distance , Perceived Exposure , and Perceived Predispositions on First-Person and Third-Person Perceptions , 2005 .

[4]  John R. Chapin,et al.  Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias Among Urban Minority At-Risk Youth , 2000, Commun. Res..

[5]  D. Dunning,et al.  A New Look at Motivated Inference: Are Self-Serving Theories of Success a Product of Motivational Forces? , 1995 .

[6]  M. Salwen.  Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship , 1998 .

[7]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[8]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  THE CAUSES OF THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS: UNREALISTIC OPTIMISM, IMPERSONAL IMPACT, OR GENERALIZED NEGATIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS MEDIA INFLUENCE? , 1996 .

[9]  W. Davison.  The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[10]  M. Defleur,et al.  Theories of mass communication , 1968 .

[11]  Marie Helweg-Larsen,et al.  Do Moderators of the Optimistic Bias Affect Personal or Target Risk Estimates? A Review of the Literature , 2001 .

[12]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Biased Optimism and the Third-Person Effect , 1993 .

[13]  J. Innes,et al.  The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the ‘third person’ effect , 1988 .

[14]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Behind the Third-Person Effect: Differentiating Perceptual Processes for Self and Other , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel L. Wann,et al.  Collective self‐esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial , 1994 .

[16]  Vera Hoorens,et al.  The optimal impact phenomenon : beyond the third person effect , 1996 .

[17]  Dominic L. Lasorsa,et al.  Real and Perceived Effects of ‘Amerika’ , 1989 .

[18]  June A. Flora,et al.  Third-Person Perception and Children , 1999 .

[19]  谷藤 悦史,et al.  Theories of Mass Communication,5th edition/Melvin L.Defleur,Sandora Ball-Rokeach(1989) , 1992 .

[20]  B. Paul,et al.  The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis , 2000 .

[21]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[22]  Charles T. Salmon,et al.  THE ‘OTHER’ AS THE VULNERABLE VOTER: A STUDY OF THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT IN THE 1988 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN , 1990 .

[23]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Third-person effects on publication of a holocaust-denial advertisement , 1998 .

[24]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[25]  Jonathon D. Brown,et al.  The Self and Social Conduct: Linking Self-Representations to Prosocial Behavior , 1991 .

[26]  Yariv Tsfati,et al.  On the Effect of the “Third-Person Effect”: Perceived Influence of Media Coverage and Residential Mobility Intentions , 2003 .

[27]  N. Weinstein.  Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[28]  M. Salwen,et al.  News of Y2K and Experiencing Y2K: Exploring the Relationship Between the Third-Person Effect and Optimistic Bias , 2003 .

[29]  S. Spencer,et al.  Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others , 1997 .

[30]  Erica Scharrer,et al.  I Know You Are But What Am I? Young People's Perceptions of Varying Types of Video Game Influence , 2006 .

[31]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Self‐Categorization Explanation for the Third‐Person Effect , 2005 .

[32]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  PERCEIVED IMPACT OF DEFAMATION AN EXPERIMENT ON THIRD-PERSON EFFECTS , 1988 .

[33]  Sue Curry Jansen,et al.  Censorship: The Knot That Binds Power and Knowledge , 1988 .

[34]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[35]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary , 1999 .

[36]  William P. Eveland,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY ON PERCEIVED MEDIA IMPACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THIRD-PERSON PERCEPTIONS , 1999 .

[37]  Richard M. Perloff,et al.  The Third Person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis , 1999 .

[38]  John F. Dillon,et al.  Knowledge about Others' Reaction to a Public Service Announcement: The Impact on Self Persuasion and Third-Person Perception , 2000 .

[39]  Jonathon D. Brown,et al.  Evaluations of Self and Others: Self-Enhancement Biases in Social Judgments , 1986 .

[40]  David H Tewksbury,et al.  Third-Person Effects of News Coverage: Orientations Toward Media , 1997 .

[41]  Patrick C. Meirick.  Self-Enhancement Motivation as a Third Variable in the Relationship Between First- and Third-Person Effects , 2005 .