EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN TECHNOLOGY-BASED ALLIANCE NETWORKS.

Although the literature converges regarding the reasons why and how networks of technology alliances are formed, there is still lack of agreement on what constitutes an optimal network structure, once it has been formed. The aim of this paper is to fill this void and to determine what constitutes an optimal network structure for exploration and exploitation within the context of technological innovation. We differentiate among a firm's direct ties, indirect ties and degree of redundancy and analyze their role in the pharmaceutical, chemical and automotive industry. Regarding the role of direct ties, in combination with indirect ties, we find two alternative alliance network structures that are effective for both exploitation and exploration. We also find that redundancy in a firm's alliance network has a positive effect on exploitation. This is not the case for exploration, however, which seems to reveal a new insight into the role of redundancy when firms explore new technological fields. A final point is that our findings remain largely invariant across the three industries, enhancing the generalisability of our results.

[1]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[2]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[3]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[6]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[7]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[8]  H. Mitsuhashi Effects of the Social Origins of Alliances on Alliance Performance , 2003 .

[9]  B. Kogut The Stability of Joint Ventures: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry , 1989 .

[10]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Productivity , 1981 .

[11]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and Patents , 1987 .

[13]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  David L. Deeds,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation Alliances in Biotechnology: A System of New Product Development , 2004 .

[15]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[16]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Scale, scope, and spillovers: the determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. , 1996, The Rand journal of economics.

[17]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[18]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Estimating Distributed Lags in Short Panels with an Application to the Specification of Depreciation Patterns and Capital Stock Constructs , 1982 .

[19]  R. Gulati Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[20]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[21]  G. Hayward Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change , 1998 .

[22]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems , 1995 .

[23]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[24]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[25]  A. P. Man,et al.  Transitory Alliances: An Instrument for Surviving Turbulent Industries? , 2003 .

[26]  B. Nooteboom Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .

[27]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[28]  Thorsten Posselt The alliance revolution — The new shape of business rivalry , 1998 .

[29]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[30]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[31]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Orietta Marsili,et al.  The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics , 2001 .

[33]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures , 2005 .

[34]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Trends and patterns in strategic technology partnering since the early seventies , 1996 .

[35]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[36]  Victor Gilsing,et al.  The dynamics of innovation and interfirm networks : exploration, exploitation and co-evolution , 2005 .

[37]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Choosing Governance Modes for External Technology Sourcing , 2006 .

[38]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[39]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[40]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[41]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[42]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[43]  B. Nooteboom Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies , 2000 .

[44]  N. Nohria,et al.  Global strategic linkages and industry structure , 1991 .

[45]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[46]  Peter Moran Structural vs. relational embeddedness: social capital and managerial performance , 2005 .

[47]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[48]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[49]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[50]  Margaret A. White,et al.  Learning and Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances: A Social Exchange View , 2005 .

[51]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? , 2003 .

[52]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Trust, Contract and Relationship Development , 2005 .

[53]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[54]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Learning in Dynamic Inter-Firm Networks: The Efficacy of Multiple Contacts , 2002 .

[55]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry , 1999 .

[56]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[58]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[59]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[61]  R. Burt The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[62]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[63]  Riitta Katila,et al.  Innovative product portfolios by navigating markets and technology , 2005 .

[64]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[65]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[66]  V. A. Gilsing The dynamics of innovation and interfirm networks , 2005 .

[67]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[68]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[69]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[70]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[71]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[72]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[73]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[74]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[75]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[76]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[77]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations , 2001 .

[78]  F. Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation , 2000 .

[79]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[80]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[81]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[82]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Inter alliance rivalry, theory and applications to the global telecommunications for the network economy , 2001 .

[83]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[84]  Niels G. Noorderhaven,et al.  Competition between Alliance Blocks: The Case of the RISC Microprocessor Technology , 2001 .

[85]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[86]  R. Katila,et al.  Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations , 2004 .

[87]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[88]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[89]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[90]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[91]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Inter-firm alliances: Analysis and design , 1999 .

[92]  Bryan Hattingh,et al.  The competitive advantage , 2007 .

[93]  Mikael Holmqvist A Dynamic Model of Intra-and Interorganizational Learning , 2003 .

[94]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[95]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[96]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[97]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[98]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[99]  F. Malerba Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe , 2009 .

[100]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[101]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[102]  M. Mizruchi Similarity of Political Behavior Among Large American Corporations , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[103]  J. Heckman,et al.  Does Unemployment Cause Future Unemployment? Definitions, Questions and Answers from a Continuous Time Model of Heterogeneity and State Dependence. , 1980 .

[104]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[105]  César Camisón-Zornoza,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size , 2004 .

[106]  大前 研一,et al.  Triad power : the coming shape of global competition , 1985 .

[107]  F. Damanpour Organizational Size and Innovation , 1992 .

[108]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Patents and productivity: (The University of Chicago Press, 1984) pp. 512, [UK pound]15.25. (paperback edition, 1987.) , 1989 .

[109]  Benjamin Coriat,et al.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: National institutional frameworks, institutional complementarities and sectoral systems of innovation , 2004 .

[110]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology , 2005 .

[111]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[112]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[113]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation and Size at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[114]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[115]  R. Jacobson Unobservable Effects and Business Performance , 1990 .

[116]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[117]  S. Albers,et al.  Crisis Construction and Organizational Learning: Capability Building in Catching-Up at Hyundai Motor , 1998 .

[118]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[119]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[120]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[121]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .