Strategies for improving neural signal detection using a neural-electronic interface

There have been various theoretical and experimental studies presented in the literature that focus on interfacing neurons with discrete electronic devices, such as transistors. From both a theoretical and experimental perspective, these studies have emphasized the variability in the characteristics of the detected action potential from the nerve cell. The demonstrated lack of reproducible fidelity of the nerve cell action potential at the device junction would make it impractical to implement these devices in any neural prosthetic application where reliable detection of the action potential was a prerequisite. In this study, the effects of several different physical parameters on the fidelity of the detected action potential at the device junction are investigated and discussed. The impact of variations in the extracellular resistivity, which directly affects the junction seal resistance, is studied along with the impact of variable nerve cell membrane capacitance and variations in the injected charge. These parameters are discussed in the context of their suitability to design manipulation for the purpose of improving the fidelity of the detected neural action potential. In addition to investigating the effects of variations in these parameters, the applicability of the linear equivalent circuit approach to calculating the junction potential is investigated.

[1]  D. Durand,et al.  Modeling the effects of electric fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Peter Fromherz,et al.  FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SIGNAL TRANSFER IN NEURON TRANSISTORS , 1997 .

[4]  Stefano Vassanelli,et al.  Transistor records of excitable neurons from rat brain , 1998 .

[5]  D. Mcneal Analysis of a Model for Excitation of Myelinated Nerve , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Peter Fromherz,et al.  Extracellular recording with transistors and the distribution of ionic conductances in a cell membrane , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[7]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Neuron–silicon junction with voltage‐gated ionic currents , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  H. de Bruin,et al.  The effect of stimulus current pulse width on nerve fiber size recruitment patterns. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Measurement of current‐voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Silicon-Neuron Junction: Capacitive Stimulation of an Individual Neuron on a Silicon Chip. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[12]  Warren M. Grill,et al.  Stimulus waveforms for selective neural stimulation , 1995 .

[13]  D. A. Ksienski,et al.  A nerve cuff technique for selective excitation of peripheral nerve trunk regions , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Stefano Vassanelli,et al.  Transistor Probes Local Potassium Conductances in the Adhesion Region of Cultured Rat Hippocampal Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The components of membrane conductance in the giant axon of Loligo , 1952, The Journal of physiology.