Control of SBR switching by fuzzy pattern recognition.

The sequencing batch reactor (SBR) is a widely used process for biological removal of nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) from wastewater. It is based on the metabolism of specialised bacteria, which under alternate anaerobic/aerobic conditions uptake phosphorus and perform denitrification. Intermittent operation is normally operated on a fixed switching schedule with ample margin for possible inaccuracies, with the result that the process operation is highly inefficient. This paper proposes a switching strategy based on the indirect observation of process state through simple physico-chemical measurements and the use of an inferential engine to determine the most appropriate switching schedule. In this way the duration of each phase is limited to the time strictly necessary for the actual loading conditions. Experimental results show that the treatment cycle can be significantly shortened, with the results that more wastewater can be treated. The switching strategy is based on innovative data-processing techniques applied to simple process signals including pH, oxido-reduction potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO). They include wavelet filtering for signal denoising and fuzzy clustering for features extraction and decision-making. The formation of a knowledge-base and its adaptation during the operation are also discussed.

[1]  J A Oleszkiewicz,et al.  Effects of predation and ORP conditions on the performance of nitrifiers in activated sludge systems. , 2003, Water research.

[2]  Jer-Yiing Houng,et al.  Real-time control of an immobilized-cell reactor for wastewater treatment using ORP. , 2002, Water research.

[3]  Oliver J. Hao,et al.  Alternating aerobic-anoxic process for nitrogen removal : process evaluation , 1996 .

[4]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[5]  References , 1971 .

[6]  Zhiqiang Hu,et al.  Biomass characteristics in three sequencing batch reactors treating a wastewater containing synthetic organic chemicals. , 2005, Water research.

[7]  Bernard W. Silverman,et al.  Preface to Wavelets: the key to intermittent information? A Discussion Meeting held at The Royal Society on 24 and 25 February 1999 , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[8]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate metabolism in dynamically fed mixed microbial cultures. , 2002, Water research.

[9]  James L. Barnard,et al.  Biological phosphorus removal , 2003 .

[10]  M. Fuerhacker,et al.  Approach for a novel control strategy for simultaneous nitrification/denitrification in activated sludge reactors , 2000 .

[11]  A. Walden,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Ryuichi Sudo,et al.  Integrated real-time control strategy for nitrogen removal in swine wastewater treatment using sequencing batch reactors. , 2004, Water research.

[13]  J J Heijnen,et al.  An integrated metabolic model for the aerobic and denitrifying biological phosphorus removal. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Simultaneous storage and degradation of PHB and glycogen in activated sludge cultures. , 2001, Water research.

[15]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Modeling long term nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor , 1999 .

[16]  A. Klapwijk,et al.  Biological nutrient removal in a sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater. , 1996 .

[17]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Effect of nitrite on phosphate uptake by phosphate accumulating organisms. , 2004, Water research.

[18]  C. M. Hooijmans,et al.  Biological phosphate removal processes , 1997, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[19]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Optimal but robust N and P removal in Sbrs: a model-based systematic study of operation scenarios. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  P Ratini,et al.  Implementation, study and calibration of a modified ASM2d for the simulation of SBR processes. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  I. Queinnec,et al.  Online estimation of wastewater nitrifiable nitrogen, nitrification and denitrification rates, using ORP and DO dynamics. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  J. M. Park,et al.  Biological nitrogen removal with enhanced phosphate uptake in a sequencing batch reactor using single sludge system. , 2001, Water research.

[23]  Paul S. Addison,et al.  The Illustrated Wavelet Transform Handbook , 2002 .

[24]  P. A. Wilderer,et al.  Computer Aided Design of Sequencing Batch Reactors Based on the IAWPRC Activated Sludge Model , 1991 .

[25]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Application of multiway ICA for on-line process monitoring of a sequencing batch reactor. , 2004, Water research.

[26]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Biological phosphorus uptake under anoxic and aerobic conditions , 1993 .

[27]  Stefano Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Adaptive fuzzy pattern recognition in the anaerobic digestion process , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[28]  N Hvala,et al.  Experimental design of an optimal phase duration control strategy used in batch biological wastewater treatment. , 2001, ISA transactions.

[29]  Takashi Asano,et al.  Sequencing batch reactors for biological wastewater treatment , 1989 .

[30]  P A Lant,et al.  Using the flexibility index to compare batch and continuous activated sludge processes. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  J. Mata-Álvarez,et al.  Utilization of SBR Technology for Wastewater Treatment: An Overview , 2002 .

[32]  B. Akin,et al.  Monitoring and control of biological nutrient removal in a Sequencing Batch Reactor , 2005 .

[33]  ROBI POLIKAR The Story of Wavelets , 2000 .

[34]  D Orhon,et al.  The mechanism and design of sequencing batch reactor systems for nutrient removal--the state of the art. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[35]  Robert Babuska,et al.  Fuzzy Modeling for Control , 1998 .

[36]  Hyunook Kim,et al.  pH and Oxidation–Reduction Potential Control Strategy for Optimization of Nitrogen Removal in an Alternating Aerobic–Anoxic System , 2001, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[37]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Mechanism and Design of Sequencing Batch Reactors for Nutrient Removal , 2005 .

[38]  Michael Kornaros,et al.  Adaptive optimization of a nitrifying sequencing batch reactor , 1999 .

[39]  S. L. Law,et al.  Development of a real-time control strategy with artificial neural network for automatic control of a continuous-flow sequencing batch reactor. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  A. Spagni,et al.  Soft sensors for control of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewaters by neural networks. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[41]  Germán Buitrón,et al.  Evaluation of two control strategies for a sequencing batch reactor degrading high concentration peaks of 4-chlorophenol. , 2005, Water research.

[42]  A. Spagni,et al.  Experimental considerations on monitoring ORP, pH, conductivity and dissolved oxygen in nitrogen and phosphorus biological removal processes. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[43]  Thomas J. McAvoy,et al.  Approaches to modeling nutrient dynamics: ASM2, simplified model and neural nets , 1999 .

[44]  J. J. Heijnen,et al.  A metabolic model for the biological phosphorus removal process , 1995 .

[45]  Stefano Marsili-Libelli,et al.  Fuzzy control of disturbances in a wastewater treatment process , 1997 .