Glycine–alanine repeats impair proper substrate unfolding by the proteasome

Proteasome ATPases unravel folded proteins. Introducing a sequence containing only glycine and alanine residues (GAr) into substrates can impair their digestion. We previously proposed that a GAr interferes with the unfolding capacity of the proteasome, leading to partial degradation of products. Here we tested that idea in several ways. Stabilizing or destabilizing a folded domain within substrate proteins changed GAr‐mediated intermediate production in the way predicted by the model. A downstream folded domain determined the sites of terminal proteolysis. The spacing between a GAr and a folded domain was critical for intermediate production. Intermediates containing a GAr did not remain associated with proteasomes, excluding models whereby retained GAr‐containing proteins halt further processing. The following model is supported: a GAr positioned within the ATPase ring reduces the efficiency of coupling between nucleotide hydrolysis and work performed on the substrate. If this impairment takes place when unfolding must be initiated, insertion pauses and proteolysis is limited to the portion of the substrate that has already entered the catalytic chamber of the proteasome.

[1]  Janina Maier,et al.  Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  A. Matouschek,et al.  An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  M. Phillips,et al.  Trypanosome ornithine decarboxylase is stable because it lacks sequences found in the carboxyl terminus of the mouse enzyme which target the latter for intracellular degradation. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[4]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[5]  Martin Rechsteiner,et al.  Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[6]  S. Matsufuji,et al.  Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination , 1992, Nature.

[7]  Stefan Imreh,et al.  Inhibition of antigen processing by the internal repeat region of the Epstein–Barr virus nuclear antigen-1 , 1995, Nature.

[8]  P. Schultz,et al.  Substrate recognition by the AAA+ chaperone ClpB , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[9]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Sem1, the yeast ortholog of a human BRCA2-binding protein, is a component of the proteasome regulatory particle that enhances proteasome stability , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[10]  S. Kain,et al.  Generation of Destabilized Green Fluorescent Protein as a Transcription Reporter* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Mingsheng Zhang,et al.  Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin‐independent substrate , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[12]  楠 慎一郎,et al.  ウニ卵におけるornithine decarboxylase活性化物質(発生学) , 1977 .

[13]  M. Glickman,et al.  Active site mutants in the six regulatory particle ATPases reveal multiple roles for ATP in the proteasome , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[14]  THE NAME "AMERICA.". , 1888, Science.

[15]  P. Coffino Ubiquitin and proteasomes: Regulation of cellular polyamines by antizyme , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Nucleotide-dependent substrate recognition by the AAA+ HslUV protease , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  S. Jentsch,et al.  Taking a bite: proteasomal protein processing , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  A. Kern,et al.  Structure of mammalian ornithine decarboxylase at 1.6 A resolution: stereochemical implications of PLP-dependent amino acid decarboxylases. , 1999, Structure.

[19]  R. Chace Lords of the ring , 1994 .

[20]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Aaa Proteins , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  Robert E. Cohen,et al.  Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  Nucleotide dependent motion and mechanism of action of p97/VCP. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  L. Ghoda,et al.  Prevention of rapid intracellular degradation of ODC by a carboxyl-terminal truncation. , 1989, Science.

[24]  A. Ciechanover,et al.  Structural Motifs Involved in Ubiquitin-Mediated Processing of the NF-κB Precursor p105: Roles of the Glycine-Rich Region and a Downstream Ubiquitination Domain , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[25]  P. Thomas,et al.  Endoproteolytic Activity of the Proteasome , 2002, Science.

[26]  K. Furtak,et al.  Loops in the Central Channel of ClpA Chaperone Mediate Protein Binding, Unfolding, and Translocation , 2005, Cell.

[27]  L. Millen,et al.  Conformational Remodeling of Proteasomal Substrates by PA700, the 19 S Regulatory Complex of the 26 S Proteasome* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  A. Matouschek,et al.  ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. , 2001, Molecular cell.

[29]  R. Huber,et al.  Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[30]  J. Freisheim,et al.  Expression and site-directed mutagenesis of human dihydrofolate reductase. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[31]  Andreas Matouschek,et al.  A conserved processing mechanism regulates the activity of transcription factors Cubitus interruptus and NF-κB , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[32]  P. Coffino,et al.  Structural Elements of Antizymes 1 and 2 Are Required for Proteasomal Degradation of Ornithine Decarboxylase* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Mingsheng Zhang,et al.  Proteasomes Begin Ornithine Decarboxylase Digestion at the C Terminus* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  M. Eilers,et al.  Binding of a specific ligand inhibits import of a purified precursor protein into mitochondria , 1986, Nature.

[35]  M. Glickman,et al.  Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology The Regulatory Particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteasome , 1997 .

[36]  Y. Shiio,et al.  Epitope tagging. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[37]  R. Müller,et al.  Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. , 1995, Gene.

[38]  S. Matsufuji,et al.  Single amino-acid replacement is responsible for the stabilization of ornithine decarboxylase in HMOA cells. , 1993, European journal of biochemistry.

[39]  Michael R Sawaya,et al.  Crystal Structure of T7 Gene 4 Ring Helicase Indicates a Mechanism for Sequential Hydrolysis of Nucleotides , 2000, Cell.

[40]  W. Baumeister,et al.  26S proteasome structure revealed by three-dimensional electron microscopy. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[41]  A Ciechanover,et al.  Inhibition of ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent protein degradation by the Gly-Ala repeat domain of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Tania A. Baker,et al.  Linkage between ATP Consumption and Mechanical Unfolding during the Protein Processing Reactions of an AAA+ Degradation Machine , 2003, Cell.

[43]  R. Huber,et al.  Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. , 1995, Science.

[44]  H. Yokosawa,et al.  Sem1p Is a Novel Subunit of the 26 S Proteasome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  Robert T Sauer,et al.  Partitioning between unfolding and release of native domains during ClpXP degradation determines substrate selectivity and partial processing. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Philip Coffino,et al.  Ubiquitin-independent Mechanisms of Mouse Ornithine Decarboxylase Degradation Are Conserved between Mammalian and Fungal Cells* 210 , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Mingsheng Zhang,et al.  Repeat Sequence of Epstein-Barr Virus-encoded Nuclear Antigen 1 Protein Interrupts Proteasome Substrate Processing* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  K. Siegers,et al.  Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR‐based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines , 1999, Yeast.

[49]  P. Loetscher,et al.  The C terminus of mouse ornithine decarboxylase confers rapid degradation on dihydrofolate reductase. Support for the pest hypothesis. , 1991, Journal of Biological Chemistry.