Submarine transitional flow deposits in the Paleogene Gulf of Mexico

Gravity-driven flows on the seafloor are the largest, yet least well understood, sediment transport agents on Earth. Recent exploration wells in ultradeep basins have revealed the presence of large sandy submarine fan systems of enigmatic facies types, many hundreds of kilometers from paleocoastlines. These sedimentary deposits often defy conventional turbidite or debrite interpretations, having a character suggestive of deposition from flows with transient turbulent-laminar rheologies. In the Wilcox Formation (Gulf of Mexico), inferred transitional flow deposits have distinctive stratigraphic stacking patterns, from fine-grained debrites to coarser grained turbidites. The vertical sequence of beds is here inferred to reflect the longitudinal bed distribution in response to lobe progradation, and demonstrates a transition from well-mixed turbulent flow, to progressively more rheologically stratified flow, and eventually to fully laminar flow. The progressive development of internal rheological boundaries resulted in a high-concentration but fluidal basal layer, and an upper quasi-laminar layer with an overriding sheared dilute turbidity current. The long runout of the flows is linked to their high silt and clay content; it is most likely flow expansion at the channel-lobe transition that drives flow transformation. This process-based model may be applicable to many deep-water settings and provides a framework within which to interpret the stratigraphic and spatial distribution of these complex deposits.

[1]  S. Balachandar,et al.  Emplacement of massive turbidites linked to extinction of turbulence in turbidity currents , 2012 .

[2]  J. Best,et al.  Depositional processes, bedform development and hybrid bed formation in rapidly decelerated cohesive (mud–sand) sediment flows , 2011 .

[3]  A. Fildani,et al.  Intrinsic controls on the range of volumes, morphologies, and dimensions of submarine lobes , 2010 .

[4]  S. P. Dutton,et al.  Diagenetic controls on evolution of porosity and permeability in lower Tertiary Wilcox sandstones from shallow to ultradeep (200–6700 m) burial, Gulf of Mexico Basin, U.S.A. , 2010 .

[5]  P. Haughton,et al.  Character and distribution of hybrid sediment gravity flow deposits from the outer Forties Fan, Palaeocene Central North Sea, UKCS , 2009 .

[6]  D. Hodgson.  Distribution and origin of hybrid beds in sand-rich submarine fans of the Tanqua depocentre, Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[7]  D. Hodgson,et al.  Evolution, architecture and hierarchy of distributary deep‐water deposits: a high‐resolution outcrop investigation from the Permian Karoo Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[8]  P. Haughton,et al.  Hybrid sediment gravity flow deposits – Classification, origin and significance , 2009 .

[9]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposits of flows transitional between turbidity current and debris flow , 2009 .

[10]  Jeff Peakall,et al.  A Phase Diagram for Turbulent, Transitional, and Laminar Clay Suspension Flows , 2009 .

[11]  E. Sumner,et al.  Deposit Structure and Processes of Sand Deposition from Decelerating Sediment Suspensions , 2008 .

[12]  P. Haughton,et al.  Development of Rheological Heterogeneity in Clay-Rich High-Density Turbidity Currents: Aptian Britannia Sandstone Member, U.K. Continental Shelf , 2008 .

[13]  Larry Zarra,et al.  Chronostratigraphic Framework for the Wilcox Formation (Upper Paleocene–Lower Eocene) in the Deep-Water Gulf of Mexico: Biostratigraphy, Sequences, and Depositional Systems , 2007 .

[14]  R. Wynn,et al.  Beds comprising debrite sandwiched within co‐genetic turbidite: origin and widespread occurrence in distal depositional environments , 2004 .

[15]  P. Haughton,et al.  ‘Linked’ debrites in sand‐rich turbidite systems – origin and significance , 2003 .

[16]  Jeffrey G. Marr,et al.  Constraining the efficiency of turbidity current generation from submarine debris flows and slides using laboratory experiments , 2003 .

[17]  A. Palfrey,et al.  Facies of slurry‐flow deposits, Britannia Formation (Lower Cretaceous), North Sea: implications for flow evolution and deposit geometry , 2003 .

[18]  J. Best,et al.  Turbulence Modulation in Clay-Rich Sediment-Laden Flows and Some Implications for Sediment Deposition , 2002 .

[19]  Jeffrey G. Marr,et al.  Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows: The role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures , 2001 .

[20]  D. Lowe,et al.  Slurry‐flow deposits in the Britannia Formation (Lower Cretaceous), North Sea: a new perspective on the turbidity current and debris flow problem , 2000 .

[21]  Gerard V. Middleton,et al.  Johannes Walther's Law of the Correlation of Facies , 1973 .

[22]  M. Hampton,et al.  The Role of Subaqueous Debris Flow in Generating Turbidity Currents , 1972 .